False-negative rate of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for pancreatic solid and cystic lesions with matched surgical resections as the gold standard

Cancer Cytopathology

Volumn 121, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 449-458

  Woolf, Kirsten M W ^a   Liang, Hua ^a   Sletten, Zachary J ^a   Russell, Donna K ^a   Bonfiglio, Thomas A ^a   Zhou, Zhongren ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Cysticlesion; Endoscopi ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration (EUS FNA) of the pancreas; False negative; Pancreatic resection; Solid lesion

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOPATHOLOGY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; ENDOSCOPIC ECHOGRAPHY; FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FEMALE; FINE NEEDLE ASPIRATION BIOPSY; GOLD STANDARD; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTRADUCTAL PAPILLARY MUCINOUS TUMOR; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MUCINOUS CYSTIC NEOPLASM; MUCINOUS CYSTIC NEOPLASM WITH ASSOCIATED INVASIVE ADENOCARCINOMA; PANCREAS ADENOCARCINOMA; PANCREAS CYST; PANCREAS RESECTION; PANCREAS TUMOR; PANCREATIC ENDOCRINE NEOPLASM; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOLID PSEUDOPAPILLARY TUMOR;

CYSTIC LESION; ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND-GUIDED FINE-NEEDLE ASPIRATION (EUS-FNA) OF THE PANCREAS; FALSE-NEGATIVE; PANCREATIC RESECTION; SOLID LESION;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND-GUIDED FINE NEEDLE ASPIRATION; FALSE NEGATIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PANCREATIC NEOPLASMS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84885035213     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19346638     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cncy.21299     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E. Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010;60:277-300.
2. Cubilla AL, Fitzgerald PJ. Cancer of the exocrine pancreas: The pathologic aspects. CA Cancer J Clin. 1985;35:2-18. (Pubitemid 15127833)
3. Helmstaedter L, Riemann JF. Pancreatic cancer-EUS and early diagnosis. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2008;393:923-927.
4. Al-Haddad M, Eloubeidi MA. Interventional EUS for the diagnosis and treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer. JOP. 2010;11:1-7.
5. Wiersema MJ, Vilmann P, Giovannini M, Chang KJ, Wiersema LM. Endosonography-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy: diagnostic accuracy and complication assessment. Gastroenterology. 1997;112:1087-1095. (Pubitemid 27157518)
6. Layfield LJ, Jarboe EA. Cytopathology of the pancreas: neoplastic and nonneoplastic entities. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2010;14:140-151.
7. Chang KJ, Nguyen P, Erickson RA, Durbin TE, Katz KD. The clinical utility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic carcinoma. Gastrointest Endosc. 1997;45:387-393. (Pubitemid 27426180)
8. Hewitt MJ, McPhail MJ, Possamai L, Dhar A, Vlavianos P, Monahan KJ. EUS-guided FNA for diagnosis of solid pancreatic neoplasms: A meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;75:319-331.
9. Genevay M, Mino-Kenudson M, Yaeger K, et al. Cytology adds value to imaging studies for risk assessment of malignancy in pancreatic mucinous cysts. Ann Surg. 2011;254:977-983.
10. Schwartz DA, Unni KK, Levy MJ, Clain JE, Wiersema MJ. The rate of false-positive results with EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56:868-872. (Pubitemid 36236718)
11. Bellizzi AM, Stelow EB. Pancreatic cytopathology: A practical approach and review. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2009;133:388-404.
12. Gleeson FC, Kipp BR, Caudill JL, et al. False positive endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration cytology: incidence and risk factors. Gut. 2010;59:586-593.
13. Pitman MB, Yaeger KA, Brugge WR, Mino-Kenudson M. Prospective analysis of atypical epithelial cells as a high-risk cytologic feature for malignancy in pancreatic cysts. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol). 2013;121:29-36.
14. Mishra G. DNA analysis of cells obtained from endoscopic ultrasound- fine needle aspiration in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Fool's Gold, Pandora's Box, or Holy Grail? Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:2501-2503. (Pubitemid 44665244)
15. Siddiqui AA, Kowalski TE, Shahid H, et al. False-positive EUS guided FNA cytology for solid pancreatic lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;74:535-540.
16. Jarboe EA, Layfield LJ. Cytologic features of pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia and pancreatitis: potential pitfalls in the diagnosis of pancreatic ductal carcinoma. Diagn Cytopathol. 2011;39:575-581.
17. Basturk O, Coban I, Adsay NV. Pancreatic cysts: pathologic classification, differential diagnosis, and clinical implications. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2009;133:423-438.
18. Tanaka M, Fernandez-del Castillo C, Adsay V, et al; International Association of Pancreatology International consensus guidelines 2012 for the management of IPMN and MCN of the pancreas. Pancreatology. 2012;12:183-197.
19. Ranney N, Phadnis M, Trevino J, Ramesh J, Wilcox CM, Varadarajulu S. Impact of biliary stents on EUS-guided FNA of pancreatic mass lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76:76-83.
20. Shami VM, Sundaram V, Stelow EB, et al. The level of carcinoembryonic antigen and the presence of mucin as predictors of cystic pancreatic mucinous neoplasia. Pancreas. 2007;34:466-469. (Pubitemid 46725789)
21. Belsley NA, Pitman MB, Lauwers GY, Brugge WR, Deshpande V. Serous cystadenoma of the pancreas: limitations and pitfalls of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Cancer. 2008;114:102-110. (Pubitemid 351640789)
22. Moparty B, Brugge WR. Approach to pancreatic cystic lesions. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2007;9:130-135. (Pubitemid 46647525)
23. Frossard JL, Amouyal P, Amouyal G, et al. Performance of endosonography- guided fine needle aspiration and biopsy in the diagnosis of pancreatic cystic lesions. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98:1516- 1524. (Pubitemid 36875343)
24. Brugge WR, Lewandrowski K, Lee-Lewandrowski E, et al. Diagnosis of pancreatic cystic neoplasms: A report of the cooperative pancreatic cyst study. Gastroenterology. 2004;126:1330-1336. (Pubitemid 38552797)
25. Thosani N, Thosani S, Qiao W, Fleming JB, Bhutani MS, Guha S. Role of EUS-FNA-based cytology in the diagnosis of mucinous pancreatic cystic lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Dis Sci. 2010;55:2756-2766.
26. Attasaranya S, Pais S, LeBlanc J, McHenry L, Sherman S, De Witt JM. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and cyst fluid analysis for pancreatic cysts. JOP. 2007;8:553-563. (Pubitemid 47455815)
27. Eloubeidi MA, Jhala D, Chhieng DC, et al. Yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy in patients with suspected pancreatic carcinoma. Cancer. 2003;99:285-292.
28. Puli SR, Bechtold ML, Buxbaum JL, Eloubeidi MA. How good is endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in diagnosing the correct etiology for a solid pancreatic mass?: A meta-analysis and systematic review. Pancreas. 2013;42:20-26.
29. Moparty B, Logrono R, Nealon WH, et al. The role of endoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in distinguishing pancreatic cystic lesions. Diagn Cytopathol. 2007;35:18-25. (Pubitemid 46095109)
30. Cai QC, Chen Y, Xiao Y, et al. A prediction rule for estimating pancreatic cancer risk in chronic pancreatitis patients with focal pancreatic mass lesions with prior negative EUS-FNA cytology. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2011;46:464-470.
31. Rogart JN, Loren DE, Singu BS, Kowalski TE. Cyst wall puncture and aspiration during EUS-guided fine needle aspiration may increase the diagnostic yield of mucinous cysts of the pancreas. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2011;45:164-169.
32. Pitman MB, Genevay M, Yaeger K, et al. High-grade atypical epithelial cells in pancreatic mucinous cysts are a more accurate predictor of malignancy than "positive" cytology. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol). 2010;118:434-440.
33. Meining A, Shah RJ, Slivka A, et al. Classification of probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy findings in pancreaticobiliary strictures. Endoscopy. 2012;44:251-257.
34. Konda VJ, Aslanian HR, Wallace MB, Siddiqui UD, Hart J, Waxman I. First assessment of needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy during EUS-FNA procedures of the pancreas (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;74:1049-1060.
35. Humphris J, Swartz D, Egan BJ, Leong RW. Status of confocal laser endomicroscopy in gastrointestinal disease. Trop Gastroenterol. 2012;33:9-20.
36. Kysucan J, Lovecek M, Klos D, et al. Benefit of PET/CT in the preoperative staging in pancreatic carcinomas. Rozhl Chir. 2010;89:433-440.
37. Manzia TM, Toti L, Lenci I, et al. Benign disease and unexpected histological findings after pancreaticoduodenectomy: The role of endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2010;92:295-301.
38. Wright ER, Bakis G, Srinivasan R, et al. Intraprocedural tissue diagnosis during ERCP employing a new cytology preparation of forceps biopsy (Smash protocol). Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106:294- 299.
39. Sreenarasimhaiah J, Lara LF, Jazrawi SF, Barnett CC, Tang SJ. A comparative analysis of pancreas cyst fluid CEA and histology with DNA mutational analysis in the detection of mucin producing or malignant cysts. JOP. 2009;10:163-168.
40. Wu J, Matthaei H, Maitra A, et al. Recurrent GNAS mutations define an unexpected pathway for pancreatic cyst development. Sci Transl Med. 2011;3:9266.
41. Garud SS, Willingham FF. Molecular analysis of cyst fluid aspiration in the diagnosis and risk assessment of cystic lesions of the pancreas. Clin Transl Sci. 2012;5:102-107.