Barriers to completion of patient reported outcome measures

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 28, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 1449-1453

  Schamber, Elizabeth M ^a,b   Takemoto, Steven K ^a   Chenok, Kate Eresian ^d   Bozic, Kevin J ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d Pacific Business Group on Health   (United States)

Author keywords

Electronic survey; Hip; Knee; Patient reported outcome measures; PROM; Total joint arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAID; MEDICARE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

ELECTRONIC SURVEY; HIP; KNEE; PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES; PROM; TOTAL JOINT ARTHROPLASTY;

ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTERS; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEYS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; SELF REPORT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URBAN POPULATION;

EID: 84885023349     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: 15328406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.06.025     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Clancy C.M., Eisenberg J.M. Outcomes research: measuring the end results of health care. Science 1998, 282(5387):245.
2. Clancy C., Collins F.S. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute: the intersection of science and health care. Sci Transl Med 2010, 2(37):37cm18.
3. Krumholz H.M. Outcomes research: generating evidence for best practice and policies. Circulation 2008, 118(3):309.
4. Shah J., et al. Electronic data capture for registries and clinical trials in orthopaedic surgery: open source versus commercial systems. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010, 468(10):2664.
5. Keller R.B. Outcomes research in orthopaedics. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 1993, 1(2):122.
6. Novak E.J., Vail T.P., Bozic K.J. Advances in orthopaedic outcomes research. J Surg Orthop Adv 2008, 17(3):200.
7. Arslanian C., Bond M. Computer assisted outcomes research in orthopedics: total joint replacement. J Med Syst 1999, 23(3):239.
8. Hawker G., et al. Health-related quality of life after knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998, 80(2):163.
9. Rolfson O. Patient-reported outcome measures and health-economic aspects of total hip arthroplasty. Department Of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences 2010, 60. Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg.
10. Tucker C.A. Computer adaptive testing for patient-reported outcomes: resources for clinical research. Journal of Physical Therapy Education 2011, 25(1):54.
11. Clancy C.M. Commentary: precision science and patient-centered care. Acad Med 2011, 86(6):667.
12. Lohr K.N. Comparative effectiveness research methods: symposium overview and summary. Med Care 2010, 48(6 Suppl):S3.
13. Leidy N.K., Vernon M. Perspectives on patient-reported outcomes: content validity and qualitative research in a changing clinical trial environment. Pharmacoeconomics 2008, 26(5):363.
14. Baker P.N., et al. The effect of surgical factors on early patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) following total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2012, 94(8):1058.
15. Dawson J., et al. The routine use of patient reported outcome measures in healthcare settings. BMJ 2010, 340:c186.
16. Wu A.W., et al. Adding the patient perspective to comparative effectiveness research. Health Aff (Millwood) 2010, 29(10):1863.
17. Abernethy A.P., et al. Electronic patient-reported data capture as a foundation of rapid learning cancer care. Medical Care 2010, 48(6 Suppl):S32.
18. Gayet-Ageron A., et al. Barriers to participation in a patient satisfaction survey: who are we missing?. PLoS One 2011, 6(10):e26852.
19. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. HCUP comorbidity software. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) 2012 April 20, 2012; Available from:. http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/toolssoftware/comorbidity/comorbidity.jsp.
20. Pew Research Center. Older adults and internet use. Pew Internet & American Life Project 2012, Pew Research Center, Washington, D.C.
21. Martin C.T., et al. Disparity in total joint arthroplasty patient comorbidities, demographics, and postoperative outcomes based on insurance payer type. J Arthroplasty 2012, 27(10):1761.
22. Hinman A., Bozic K.J. Impact of payer type on resource utilization, outcomes and access to care in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2008, 23(6 Suppl 1):9.
23. The Henry J.Kaiser Family Foundation The digital divide and access to health information online. Disparities policy project 2011, The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, Menlo Park, CA. K.F. Foundation (Ed.).
24. Woloshin S., et al. Is language a barrier to the use of preventive services?. J Gen Intern Med 1997, 12(8):472.
25. Chang C.H. Patient-reported outcomes measurement and management with innovative methodologies and technologies. Qual Life Res 2007, 16(Suppl 1):157.
26. Rolfson O., et al. Internet-based follow-up questionnaire for measuring patient-reported outcome after total hip replacement surgery-reliability and response rate. Value Health 2011, 14(2):316.
27. Goel M.S., et al. Patient reported barriers to enrolling in a patient portal. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011, 18(Suppl 1):i8.