Web-based versus paper administration of common ophthalmic questionnaires: Comparison of subscale scores

Ophthalmology

Volumn 120, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 2151-2159

  Clayton, Janine Austin ^a,b   Eydelman, Malvina ^c   Vitale, Susan ^b   Manukyan, Zorayr ^d   Kramm, Robert ^c   Datiles III, Manuel ^b   Temple, Alana ^b   Murphy, Elizabeth ^b   Kim, Jonghyeon ^d   Hilmantel, Gene ^c   Rorer, Eva ^c   Hammel, Keri ^d   Ferris III, Frederick ^b  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

^b NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c CENTER FOR DEVICES AND RADIOLOGICAL HEALTH   (United States)

^d EMMES CORPORATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; BIOMICROSCOPY; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; DRY EYE; EYE EXAMINATION; FEMALE; GLARE; HUMAN; INTERNET; KERATOCONJUNCTIVITIS SICCA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NAMED INVENTORIES, QUESTIONNAIRES AND RATING SCALES; NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE VISUAL FUNCTION QUESTIONNAIRE; OCULAR SURFACE DISEASE; OCULAR SURFACE DISEASE INDEX; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PATIENT WORRY; PHOTOPHOBIA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REFRACTION ERROR; REFRACTIVE ERROR QUALITY OF LIFE INSTRUMENT; REFRACTIVE SURGERY; SATISFACTION WITH CORRECTION; SLIT LAMP; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL SYSTEM EXAMINATION;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNET; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPHTHALMOLOGY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PAPER; QUESTIONNAIRES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84885022896     PISSN: 01616420     EISSN: 15494713     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.03.019     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. J. Thumboo, H.L. Wee, and Y.B. Cheung Computerized administration of health-related quality of life instruments compared to interviewer administration may reduce sample size requirements in clinical research: a pilot randomized controlled trial among rheumatology patients Clin Exp Rheumatol 25 2007 577 583
2. S.J. Coons, C.J. Gwaltney, R.D. Hays ISPOR ePRO Task Force Recommendations on evidence needed to support measurement equivalence between electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: ISPOR ePRO Good Research Practices Task Force Report Value Health 12 2009 419 429
3. R.D. Hays, R. Bode, and N. Rothrock The impact of next and back buttons on time to complete and measurement reliability in computer-based surveys Qual Life Res 19 2010 1181 1184
4. Tiplady B. ePROs: practical issues in pen and touchscreen systems. March 2, 2007. Available at: http://appliedclinicaltrialsonline.findpharma.com/ appliedclinicaltrials/article/articleDetail.jsp?id=410611. Accessed April 1, 2011.
5. M. Rose, and A. Bezjak Logistics of collecting patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in clinical practice: an overview and practical examples Qual Life Res 18 2009 125 136
6. R. Norman, M. King, and D. Clarke Does mode of administration matter? Comparison of online and face-to-face administration of a time trade-off task Qual Life Res 19 2010 499 508
7. F.L. Bishop, G. Lewis, and S. Harris A within-subjects trial to test the equivalence of online and paper outcome measures: the Roland Morris disability questionnaire BMC Musculoskelet Disord [serial online] 11 2010 113 Available at http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/11/113 Accessed December 26, 2012
8. C.J. Gwaltney, A.L. Shields, and S. Schiffman Equivalence of electronic and paper-and-pencil administration of patient-reported outcome measures: a meta-analytic review Value Health 11 2008 322 333
9. Y.B. Cheung, C. Goh, and J. Thumboo Quality of life scores differed according to mode of administration in a review of three major oncology questionnaires J Clin Epidemiol 59 2006 185 191
10. R. Schiffman, J.G. Walt, and G. Jacobsen Utility assessment among patients with dry eye disease Ophthalmology 110 2003 1412 1419
11. B. Miljanovic, R. Dana, D.A. Sullivan, and D.A. Schaumberg Impact of dry eye syndrome on vision-related quality of life Am J Ophthalmol 143 2007 409 415
12. J.D. Nelson, H. Helms, and R. Fiscella A new look at dry eye disease and its treatment Adv Ther 17 2000 84 93
13. The epidemiology of dry eye disease: report of the Epidemiology Subcommittee of the International Dry Eye WorkShop (2007) Ocul Surf 5 2007 93 107
14. R.D. Hays, C.M. Mangione, L. Ellwein NEI-RQL Research Group Psychometric properties of the National Eye Institute-Refractive Error Quality of Life instrument Ophthalmology 110 2003 2292 2301
15. R.M. Schiffman, M.D. Christianson, and G. Jacobsen Reliability and validity of the Ocular Surface Disease Index Arch Ophthalmol 118 2000 615 621
16. C.M. Mangione, P.P. Lee, J. Pitts NEI-VFQ Field Test Investigators Psychometric properties of the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ) Arch Ophthalmol 116 1998 1496 1504
17. D.G. Altman Comparing groups- categorical data. In: Practical Statistics for Medical Research 1991 Chapman & Hall London 253-7
18. J.M. Bland, and D.G. Altman Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement Lancet 1 1986 307 310
19. J.M. Bland, and D.G. Altman Measuring agreement in method comparison studies Stat Methods Med Res 8 1999 135 160
20. Y.B. Unver, G.A. Yavuz, and S.H. Sinclair Interactive, computer-based, self-reported, visual function questionnaire: the PalmPilot-VFQ Eye (Lond) 23 2009 1572 1581