A within-subjects trial to test the equivalence of online and paper outcome measures: The Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Volumn 11, Issue , 2010, Pages

  Bishop, Felicity L ^a   Lewis, Graham ^a   Harris, Scott ^a   McKay, Naomi ^b   Prentice, Philippa ^b   Thiel, Haymo ^b   Lewith, George T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^b ANGLO EUROPEAN COLLEGE OF CHIROPRACTIC   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BACKACHE; DISABILITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; ONLINE SYSTEM; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PUBLICATION; QUESTIONNAIRE; ROLAND MORRIS DISABILITY QUESTIONNAIRE; ADOLESCENT; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; INTERNET; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARD; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; BACK PAIN; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNET; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; ONLINE SYSTEMS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PAIN MEASUREMENT; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77954381420     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712474     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-113     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Using the internet for research: results at a keystroke. E Murray, Br J Gen Pract 2007 57 939 940 10.3399/096016407782605045 18252066
2. Nonequivalence of on-line and paper-and-pencil psychological test: the case of the prospective memory questionnaire. T Buchanan T Heffernan J Ling A Parrott J Rodgers A Scholey, Behav Res Methods 2005 37 148 154 16097355
3. Should We Trust Web-Based Studies: A Comparative Analysis of Six Preconceptions About Internet Questionnaires. SD Gosling S Vazire S Srivastava OP John, Am Psychol 2004 59 93 104 10.1037/0003-066X.59.2.93 14992636
4. Internet and written respiratory questionnaires yield equivalent results for adolescents. H Raat RT Mangunkusumo AD Moghangoo EF Juniper, Pediatr Pulmonol 2007 42 357 361 10.1002/ppul.20576 17335011
5. Internet versus mailed questionnaires: a controlled comparison (2). P Leece M Bhandari S Sprague MF Swiontkowski EH Schemitsch P Tornetta PJ Devereaux GH Guyatt, J Med Internet Res 2004 29 (6):e39
6. Internet-administered adolescent health questionnaires compared with a paper version in a randomized study. RT Mangunkusumo PW Moorman Ruiter AE Van Den Berg-De J Ven Der Lei HJ De Koning H Raat, J Adolesc Health 2005 36 1 70.e1 70.e6 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2004.02.020 (Pubitemid 40127470)
7. Web-based and Mailed Questionnaires: A comparison of response rates and compliance. KA Bälter O Bälter E Fondell YT Lagerros, Epidemiology 2005 16 577 579 10.1097/01.ede.0000164553.16591.4b 15951679
8. First Release: Internet Access, Households and Individuals 2007. Office for National Statistics 2007 http://www.statistics.gov.uk
9. The ATTEMPT cohort: a multi-national longitudinal study of predictors, patterns and consequences of smoking cessation; introduction and evaluation of internet recruitment and data collection method. R West A Gilsenan F Coste X Zhou R Brouard J Nonnemaker SJ Curry SD Sullivan, Addiction 2006 101 1352 1361 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01534.x 16911736 (Pubitemid 44199528)
10. Web surveys: A review of issues and approaches. M Couper, Public Opin Q 2000 64 464 494 10.1086/318641 11171027
11. Internet versus mailed questionnaires: A randomised comparison. P Ritter K Lorig D Laurent K Mathews, J Med Internet Res 2004 6 (3):e29 10.2196/jmir.6.3.e29
12. The economic burden of back pain in the UK. N Maniadakis A Gray, Pain 2000 84 95 103 10.1016/S0304-3959(99)00187-6 10601677
13. A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: Development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain. M Roland R Morris, Spine 1983 8 141 144 10.1097/00007632-198303000-00004 6222486 (Pubitemid 13089565)
14. Assessing health-related quality of life in patients with sciatica. DL Patrick RA Deyo SJ Atlas DE Singer A Chapin RB Keller, Spine 1995 20 1899 1909 10.1097/00007632-199509000-00011 8560339
15. Outcome measures for low back pain research: A proposal for standardized use. RA Deyo M Battie AJHM Beurskens C Bombardier P Croft B Koes A Malmivaara M Roland M Von Korff G Waddell, Spine 1998 23 2003 2013 10.1097/00007632- 199809150-00018 9779535
16. The Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire. M Roland J Fairbank, Spine 2000 25 3115 3124 10.1097/00007632- 200012150-00006 11124727
17. Outcome assessments in the evaluation of treatment of spinal disorders: summary and general recommendations. C Bombardier, Spine 2000 25 3100 3103 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00003 11124724 (Pubitemid 32042940)
18. United Kingdom back pain exercise and manipulation (UK BEAM) randomised trial: effectiveness of physical treatments for back pain in primary care. UK BEAM trial team, BMJ 2004
19. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. JM Bland DG Altman, The Lancet 1986 1 307 310
20. Defining the minimum level of detectable change for the Roland-Morris questionnaire. PW Stratford JM Binkley P Solomon E Finch C Gill J Moreland, Phys Ther 1996 76 359 365 8606899 (Pubitemid 126501431)
21. Content and thematic analysis. H Joffe L Yardley, Research methods for clinical and health psychology London: Sage, Marks DF, 2004 56 68
22. Equivalence of electronic and paper-and-pencil administration of patient-reported outcome measures: A meta-analytic review. CJ Gwaltney AL Shields S Shiffman, Value Health 2008 11 322 333 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00231. x 18380645