Does mode of administration matter? Comparison of online and face-to-face administration of a time trade-off task

Quality of Life Research

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 499-508

  Norman, Richard ^a   King, Madeleine T ^b   Clarke, Dushyant ^c,d   Viney, Rosalie ^c   Cronin, Paula ^c   Street, Deborah ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

EQ 5D; Mode of administration; Preference elicitation; Time trade off

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; METHODOLOGY; ONLINE SYSTEM; PSYCHOMETRY; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; TIME;

ADULT; ALGORITHMS; DATA COLLECTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; ONLINE SYSTEMS; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77956393725     PISSN: 09629343     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-010-9609-5     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Hawthorne, G., Richardson, J., & Day, N. A. (2001). A comparison of the assessment of quality of life (AQoL) with four other generic utility instruments. Annals of Medicine, 33(5), 358-370.
2. Bansback, N., Davis, S., & Brazier, J. (2007). Using contrast sensitivity to estimate the cost-effectiveness of verteporfin in patients with predominantly classic age-related macular degeneration. Eye, 21(12), 1455-1463.
3. Brazier, J., Roberts, J., & Deverill, M. (2002). The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. Journal of Health Economics, 21(2), 271-292.
4. Dolan, P. (1997). Modelling valuations for EuroQol health states. Medical Care, 35(11), 1095-1108.
5. Hawthorne, G., Richardson, J., & Osborne, R. (1999). The assessment of quality of life (AQoL) instrument: A psychometric measure of health-related quality of life. Quality of Life Research, 8(3), 209-224.
6. Horsman, J., Furlong, W., Feeny, D., et al. (2003). The health utilities index (hui): Concepts, measurement properties and applications. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 1(54).
7. Drummond, M., O'Brien, B. J., Stoddart, G. L., et al. (2004). Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. Oxford: Oxford Medical Publications.
8. Damschroder, L. J., Baron, J., Hershey, J. C., et al. (2004). The validity of person tradeoff measurements: Randomized trial of computer elicitation versus face-to-face interview. Medical Decision Making, 24(2), 170-180.
9. Dolan, P. (1996). Modelling valuations for health states: The effect of duration. Health Policy, 38(3), 189-203.
10. Tsuchiya, A., Ikeda, S., Ikegami, N., et al. (2002). Estimating an EQ-5D population value set: The case of Japan. Health Economics, 11(4), 341-353.
11. Bowling, A. (2005). Mode of questionnaire administration can have serious effects on data quality. Journal of Public Health (Oxford), 27(3), 281-291.
12. Gwaltney, C. J., Shields, A. L., & Shiffman, S. (2008). Equivalence of electronic and paper-and-pencil administration of patient-reported outcome measures: A meta-analytic review. Value in Health, 11(2), 322-333.
13. Dolan, P., Gudex, C., Kind, P., et al. (1996). The time trade-off method: Results from a general population study. Health Economics, 5(2), 141-154.
14. Hochberg, Y. (1988). A sharper bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance. Biometrika, 75(4), 800-802.
15. Badia, X., Roset, M., Herdman, M., et al. (2001). A comparison of United Kingdom and Spanish general population time trade-off values for EQ-5D health states. Medical Decision Making, 21(1), 7-16.
16. Chow, G. C. (1960). Tests of equality between sets of coefficients in two linear regressions. Econometrica, 28(3), 591-605.
17. Pickard, A. S., Neary, M. P., & Cella, D. (2007). Estimation of minimally important differences in EQ-5D utility and VAS scores in cancer. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 5(70).
18. Roberts, J., & Dolan, P. (2004). To what extent do people prefer health states with higher values? A note on evidence from the EQ-5D valuation set. Health Economics, 13(7), 733-737.
19. Johnson, F. R., Ozdemir, S., & Hauber, A. B. (2007). Motivating out-of-pocket treatment costs with cheap talk. iHEA 2007 6th World Congress. Copenhagen.
20. Smith, D. M., Schwarz, N., Roberts, T. R., et al. (2006). Why are you calling me? How study introductions change response patterns. Quality of Life Research, 15(4), 621-630.