Neonatal non-invasive respiratory support: Synchronised NIPPV, non-synchronised NIPPV or Bi-level CPAP: What is the evidence in 2013?

Neonatology

Volumn 104, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 203-209

  Roberts, C T ^a   Davis, P G ^a,b,c   Owen, L S ^a,b,c  

^a ROYAL WOMEN'S HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^b MURDOCH CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Bi level positive airway pressure; Newborns; Non invasive respiratory support; Non synchronised nasal intermittent positive pressure; Respiratory distress syndrome; Ventilation

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; ASSISTED VENTILATION; BI LEVEL POSITIVE AIRWAY PRESSURE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL PRACTICE; FUNCTIONAL RESIDUAL CAPACITY; GAS EXCHANGE; HUMAN; LUNG DYSPLASIA; LUNG FUNCTION TEST; LUNG MINUTE VOLUME; MORTALITY; NEWBORN APNEA; NON SYNCHRONISED NASAL INTERMITTENT POSITIVE PRESSURE VENTILATION; OXYGENATION; POSITIVE END EXPIRATORY PRESSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REVIEW; SYNCHRONISED NASAL INTERMITTENT POSITIVE PRESSURE VENTILATION; TIDAL VOLUME;

CONTINUOUS POSITIVE AIRWAY PRESSURE; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; INFANT, PREMATURE; INTERMITTENT POSITIVE-PRESSURE VENTILATION; INTUBATION, INTRATRACHEAL;

EID: 84885017823     PISSN: 16617800     EISSN: 16617819     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000353448     Document Type: Review

References (61)

1. Hutchison AA, S Bignall: Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation in the preterm neonate: reducing endotrauma and the incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2008; 93:F64-F68.
2. Young TE, et al: Population-based study of chronic lung disease in very low birth weight infants in North Carolina in 1994 with comparisons with 1984. The North Carolina Neonatologists Association. Pediatrics 1999; 104:e17.
3. Johnson AH, et al: High-frequency oscillatory ventilation for the prevention of chronic lung disease of prematurity. N Engl J Med 2002; 347: 633-642.
4. Craft AP, Bhandari V, Finer NN: The sy-fi study: a randomized prospective trial of synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation versus a high-frequency flow interrupter in infants less than 1000 g. J Perinatol 2003; 23: 14-19.
5. Wheeler KI, et al: Volume-targeted versus pressure-limited ventilation for preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neonatology 2011; 100: 219-227.
6. Stoll BJ, et al: Neonatal outcomes of extremely preterm infants from the NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Pediatrics 2010; 126: 443-456.
7. Shah PS, et al: Outcomes of preterm infants <29 weeks gestation over 10-year period in Canada: a cause for concern? J Perinatol 2012; 32: 132-138.
8. Finer NN, et al: Early CPAP versus surfactant in extremely preterm infants. N Engl J Med, 2010; 362: 1970-1979.
9. Morley CJ, et al: Nasal CPAP or intubation at birth for very preterm infants. N Engl J Med, 2008. 358: 700-708.
10. Kiciman NM, et al: Thoracoabdominal motion in newborns during ventilation delivered by endotracheal tube or nasal prongs. Pediatr Pulmonol 1998; 25: 175-181.
11. Kugelman A, et al: Nasal intermittent mandatory ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure for respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized, controlled, prospective study. J Pediatr 2007; 150: 521-526, 526 e1.
12. Ali N, et al: Effects of non-invasive pressure support ventilation (NI-PSV) on ventilation and respiratory effort in very low birth weight infants. Pediatr Pulmonol 2007; 42: 704-710.
13. Ancora G, et al: Role of bilevel positive airway pressure in the management of preterm newborns who have received surfactant. Acta Paediatr 2010; 99: 1807-1811.
14. Migliori C, et al: Nasal bilevel vs. continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants. Pediatr Pulmonol 2005; 40: 426-430.
15. Lista G, et al: Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) versus bi-level nasal CPAP in preterm babies with respiratory distress syndrome: a randomised control trial. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2010; 95:F85-F89.
16. O'Brien K, et al: Infant flow biphasic nasal continuous positive airway pressure (BPNCPAP) vs. infant flow NCPAP for the facilitation of extubation in infants'
17. Barrington KJ, Bull D, Finer NN: Randomized trial of nasal synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation compared with continuous positive airway pressure after extubation of very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 2001; 107: 638-641.
18. Friedlich P, et al: A randomized trial of nasopharygeal-synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation versus nasopharyngeal continuous positive airway pressure in very low birth weight infants after extubation. J Perinatol 1999; 19: 638-641.
19. Khalaf MN, et al: A prospective randomized, controlled trial comparing synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure as modes of extubation. Pediatrics 2001; 108: 13-17.
20. Meneses J, et al: Noninvasive ventilation for respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics 2011; 127: 300-307.
21. Sai Sunil Kishore M, Dutta S, Kumar P: Early nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus continuous positive airway pressure for respiratory distress syndrome. Acta Paediatr 2009; 98: 1412-1415.
22. de Medeiros SK, Carvalho WB, Soriano CF: Practices of use of nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) in neonatology in northeastern Brazil. J Pediatr (Rio J) 2012; 88: 48-53.
23. Owen LS, Morley CJ, Davis PG: Neonatal nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation: a survey of practice in England. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2008; 93:F148-F150.
24. Kieran EA, Walsh H, O'Donnell CP: Survey of nasal continuous positive airways pressure (NCPAP) and nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) use in Irish newborn nurseries. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2011; 96:F156.
25. Lin C, et al: Efficacy of nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation in treating apnea of prematurity. Pediatr Pulmonol 1998; 26: 349-353.
26. Ramanathan R, et al: Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation after surfactant treatment for respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants <30 weeks' gestation: a randomized, controlled trial. J Perinatol 2012; 32: 336-343.
27. Santin R, Brodsky N, Bhandari V: A prospective observational pilot study of synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (SNIPPV) as a primary mode of ventilation in infants > or = 28 weeks with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). J Perinatol 2004; 24: 487-493.
28. De Paoli AG, et al: Devices and pressure sources for administration of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) in preterm neonates. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008:CD002977.
29. De Paoli AG, et al: In vitro comparison of nasal continuous positive airway pressure devices for neonates. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2002; 87:F42-F45.
30. Bhandari, V, et al: A randomized controlled trial of synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation in RDS. J Perinatol 2007; 27: 697-703.
31. Jackson JK, et al: Evidence-based approach to change in clinical practice: introduction of expanded nasal continuous positive airway pressure use in an intensive care nursery. Pediatrics 2003; 111:e542-e547.
32. Yong SC, Chen SJ, Boo NY: Incidence of nasal trauma associated with nasal prong versus nasal mask during continuous positive airway pressure treatment in very low birthweight infants: a randomised control study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2005; 90:F480-F483.
33. Kieran EA, et al: Randomized trial of prongs or mask for nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants. Pediatrics 2012; 130:e1170-e1176.
34. Jackson HD, et al: Mask versus prongs for CPAP delivery: Incidence of bradycardia, apnoea and desaturation (BAD) events. J Paediatr Child Health 2013; 49(suppl 2):21, abstr A072.
35. Chang HY, et al: Effects of synchronization during nasal ventilation in clinically stable preterm infants. Pediatr Res 2011; 69: 84-89.
36. Owen L, Morley C, Davis P: Bench-top accuracy of SiPAP-generated nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation. Acta Paediatr 2013; 102:e385-e388.
37. Moretti C, et al: Nasal flow-synchronized intermittent positive pressure ventilation to facilitate weaning in very low-birth-weight infants: unmasked randomized controlled trial. Pediatr Int 2008; 50: 85-91.
38. Fischer HS, et al: Is volume and leak monitoring feasible during nasopharyngeal continuous positive airway pressure in neonates? Intensive Care Med 2009; 35: 1934-1941.
39. Courtney SE, Barrington KJ: Continuous positive airway pressure and noninvasive ventilation. Clin Perinatol 2007; 34: 73-92, vi.
40. Aghai, ZH, et al: Synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (SNIPPV) decreases work of breathing (WOB) in premature infants with respirato-ry distress syndrome (RDS) compared to nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP). Pediatr Pulmonol 2006; 41: 875-881.
41. Beck J, et al: Patient-ventilator interaction during neurally adjusted ventilatory assist in low birth weight infants. Pediatr Res 2009; 65: 663-668.
42. Ryan CA, Finer NN, Peters KL: Nasal intermittent positive-pressure ventilation offers no advantages over nasal continuous positive airway pressure in apnea of prematurity. Am J Dis Child 1989; 143: 1196-1198.
43. Owen LS, Morley CJ, Davis PG: Pressure variation during ventilator generated nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation in preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2010; 95:F359-F364.
44. Owen LS, Morley CJ, Davis PG: Do the pressure changes of neonatal non-synchronised NIPPV (NS nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation) confer advantages over CPAP, or are high CPAP pressures as effective? Pediatr Res 2011; 70: 16.
45. Owen LS, et al: Effects of non-synchronised nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation on spontaneous breathing in preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2011; 96:F422-F428.
46. Owen LS, Morley CJ, Davis PG: Neonatal nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation: what do we know in 2007? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2007; 92:F414-F418.
47. Moretti C, et al: Comparing the effects of nasal synchronized intermittent positive pressure ventilation (nSIPPV) and nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) after extubation in very low birth weight infants. Early Hum Dev 1999; 56: 167-177.
48. Pantalitschka T, et al: Randomised crossover trial of four nasal respiratory support systems for apnoea of prematurity in very low birthweight infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2009; 94: 245-248.
49. Bisceglia M, et al: A comparison of nasal intermittent versus continuous positive pressure delivery for the treatment of moderate respiratory syndrome in preterm neonates. Minerva Pediatr 2007; 59: 91-95.
50. Khorana M, et al: A randomized trial of nonsynchronized nasopharyngeal intermit-tent mandatory ventilation (nsNIMV) vs. nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) in the prevention of extubation failure in pre-term <1,500 grams. J Med As-soc Thai 2008; 91(suppl 3):S136-S142.
51. Lemyre B, Davis PG, De Paoli AG: Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for apnea of prematurity. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000: CD002272.
52. Meneses J, Bhandari V, Alves JG: Nasal intermittent positive-pressure ventilation vs nasal continuous positive airway pressure for preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2012; 166: 372-376.
53. Davis PG, Lemyre B, de Paoli AG: Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm neonates after extubation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001:CD003212.
54. Gizzi C, et al: Flow-synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation for infants <32 weeks' gestation with respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Res Pract 2012; 2012: 301818.
55. Wood FE, et al: Randomised controlled trial of synchronised intermittent positive airway pressure (SiPAP) versus continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) as a primary mode of respiratory support in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome. E-PAS 2013: 3500.8.
56. van der Hoeven M, Brouwer E, Blanco CE: Nasal high frequency ventilation in neonates with moderate respiratory insufficiency. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1998; 79:F61-F63.
57. Colaizy TT, et al: Nasal high-frequency ventilation for premature infants. Acta Paediatr 2008; 97: 1518-1522.
58. Dumas De La Roque E, et al: Nasal high frequency percussive ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in transient tachypnea of the newborn: A pilot randomized controlled trial (NCT00556738). Pediatr Pulmonol 2011; 46: 218-223.
59. Lemyre B, et al: Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal CPAP (nCPAP) post-extubation in preterm infants: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. E-PAS 2013: 4515-245.
60. Kirpalani H, et al: Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) does not confer benefit above nasal CPAP (nCPAP) in extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants <1000 g BW-The NIPPV International Randomised Controlled Trial. E-PAS 2012: 1675.1.
61. Kugelman A, Durand M: A comprehensive approach to the prevention of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Pediatr Pulmonol 2011; 46: 1153-1165.