Synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (SNIPPV) decreases work of breathing (WOB) in premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) compared to nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP)

Pediatric Pulmonology

Volumn 41, Issue 9, 2006, Pages 875-881

  Aghai, Zubair H ^a,b   Saslow, Judy G ^a   Nakhla, Tarek ^a   Milcarek, Barry ^b   Hart, James ^b   Lawrysh Plunkett, Robyn ^b   Stahl, Gary ^a   Habib, Robert H ^c   Pyon, Kee H ^a  

^a RUTGERS ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b Department of Anesthesiology   (United States)

^c MEDICAL COLLEGE OF OHIO   (United States)

Author keywords

Nasal continuous positive airway pressure; Respiratory distress syndrome; Respiratory inductance plethysmography; Synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation; Work of breathing

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREATHING RATE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; ESOPHAGUS PRESSURE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFANT; INTERMITTENT POSITIVE PRESSURE VENTILATION; LUNG COMPLIANCE; LUNG FUNCTION TEST; LUNG MINUTE VOLUME; LUNG PRESSURE; MALE; NOSE; PLETHYSMOGRAPHY; POSITIVE END EXPIRATORY PRESSURE; PREMATURITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME; TIDAL VOLUME;

CONTINUOUS POSITIVE AIRWAY PRESSURE; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; INTERMITTENT POSITIVE-PRESSURE VENTILATION; MALE; RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME, NEWBORN; WORK OF BREATHING;

EID: 33748092405     PISSN: 87556863     EISSN: 10990496     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ppul.20461     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Attar AM, Donn SM. Mechanisms of ventilator-induced lung injury in premature infants. Semin Neonatol 2002;7:353-360.
2. Clark RH, Gerstmann DR, Jobe AH, Moffitt ST, Slutsky AS, Yoder BA. Lung injury in neonates: Causes, strategies for prevention, and long-term consequences. J Pediatr 2001;139:478-486.
3. Jobe AH, Bancalari E. NICHD/NHLBI/ORD Workshop summary: Bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001;163:1723-1729.
4. Moa G, Nilsson K, Zetterstrom H, Jonsonn LO. A new device for administration of nasal continuous positive airway pressure in the newborn: An experimental study. Crit Care Med 1988;16:1238-1242.
5. Pollin RA, Sahni R. Newer experience with CPAP. Semin Neonatol 2002;7:379-389.
6. Khalaf MN, Brodsky N, Hurley J, Bhandari V. A prospective randomized, controlled trial comparing synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure as modes of extubation. Pediatrics 2001; 108:13-17.
7. Barrington KJ, Bull D, Finer NN. Randomized trial of nasal synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation compared with continuous positive airway pressure after extubation of very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 2001;107:638-641.
8. Santin R, Brodsky N, Bhandari V. A prospective observational pilot study of synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (SNIPPV) as a primary mode of ventilation in infants > or = 28 weeks with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). J Perinatol 2004;24:487-493.
9. Ryan CA, Finer NN, Peters KL. Nasal intermittent positive-pressure ventilation offers no advantages over nasal continuous positive airway pressure in apnea of prematurity. Am J Dis Child 1989;143:1196-1198.
10. Lin CH, Wang ST, Lin YJ, Yeh TF. Efficacy of nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation in treating apnea of prematurity. Pediatr Pulmonol 1998;26:349-353.
11. Moretti C, Gizzi C, Papoff P, Lampariello S, Campoferri M, Calcagnini G, Bucci G. Comparing the effects of nasal synchronized intermittent positive pressure ventilation (nSIPPV) and nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) after extubation in very low birth weight infants. Early Hum Dev 1999; 56:167-177.
12. Courtney SE, Pyon KH, Saslow JG, Arnold GK, Pandit PB, Habib RH. Lung recruitment and breathing pattern during variable versus continuous flow nasal continuous positive airway pressure in premature infants: An evaluation of three devices. Pediatrics 2001;107:304-308.
13. Pandit PB, Courtney SE, Pyon KH, Saslow JG, Habib RH. Work of breathing during constant- and variable-flow nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm neonates. Pediatrics 2001; 108:682-685.
14. Courtney SE, Aghai ZH, Saslow JG, Pyon KH, Habib RH. Changes in lung volume and work of breathing: A comparison of two variable-flow nasal continuous positive airway pressure devices in very low birth weight infants. Pediatr Pulmonol 2003; 36:248-252.
15. Liptsen E, Aghai ZH, Pyon KH, Saslow JG, Nakhla T, Long J, Steele AM, Habib RH, Courtney SE. Work of breathing during nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants: A comparison of bubble vs variable-flow devices. J Perinatol 2005; 25:453-458.
16. Bland JM, Altman DG. Multiple significance tests: The Bonferroni method. BMJ 1995;310:170.
17. Enkin MW. One and two-sided tests of significance: Statistical hypotheses should be brought into line with clinical hypotheses. BMJ 1994;309:873-874.
18. Davis PG, Lemyre B, De Paoli AG. Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm neonates after extubation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001;3:CD003212.
19. Lemyre B, Davis PG, De Paoli AG. Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for apnea of prematurity. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000;3:CD002272.
20. Garland JS, Nelson DB, Rice T, Neu J. Increased risk of gastrointestinal perforations in neonates mechanically ventilated with either face mask or nasal prongs. Pediatrics 1985;76:406-410.