|
Volumn 108, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 13-17
|
A prospective randomized, controlled trial comparing synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure as modes of extubation
|
Author keywords
Continuous positive airway pressure; Nasal ventilation; Respiratory distress syndrome
|
Indexed keywords
AIRWAY RESISTANCE;
ARTICLE;
BODY WEIGHT;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
EXTUBATION;
FEMALE;
HUMAN;
INFANT;
INTERMITTENT POSITIVE PRESSURE VENTILATION;
LUNG COMPLIANCE;
LUNG FUNCTION TEST;
LUNG VENTILATION;
MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY;
MALE;
NEWBORN;
NOSE BREATHING;
POSITIVE END EXPIRATORY PRESSURE;
PREMATURITY;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;
RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
INFANT;
INFANT, NEWBORN;
INTERMITTENT POSITIVE-PRESSURE VENTILATION;
MALE;
POSITIVE-PRESSURE RESPIRATION;
PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;
RESPIRATORY FUNCTION TESTS;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
VENTILATOR WEANING;
|
EID: 0034951256
PISSN: 00314005
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1542/peds.108.1.13 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (173)
|
References (31)
|