“It's not just going to collect dust on a shelf:” Faculty Perceptions of the Applied Dissertation in the New California State University (CSU) Ed.D. Programs Leadership Education from within a Feminist Ethos

Journal of Research on Leadership Education

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 59-82

  Auerbach, Susan ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84885013985     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19427751     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/194277511100600301     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Anderson G., Herr K., (1999). The new paradigm wars: Is there room for rigorous practitioner knowledge in schools and universities? Educational Researcher, 28(5), 12–28.
2. Anderson G. L., Herr K., (in press). Action research and educational leadership: Power, hierarchy, and practitioner knowledge. In Smekh B., Noffke S., (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Action Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3. Anderson G. L., Jones F., (2000). Knowledge generation in educational administration from the inside-out: The promise and perils of site-based, administrator research. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36(3), 428–464.
4. André Bechely L., (2009). Capturing change in the making: The policy contexts for independent Ed.D.s at California State University. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
5. Barnes B. J., Austin A. E., (2008). The role of doctoral advisors: A look at advising from the advisors's perspective. Innovations in higher education 2009, 33(5), 297–315.
6. Bissell J., (2009). The new California State University Ed.D. programs: Continuity or change? Discussant at symposium presented at the University Council for Educational Administration (UCEA), Anaheim, CA.
7. California Postsecondary Education Commission. (2000). The production and utilization of education doctorates for administrators in California's public schools. (Commission Report 00–9). Sacramento, CA: Author.
8. California State University Office of the Chancellor. (2006). Doctor of Education Degree, Executive Order 991, 1–20. Long Beach, CA: Author.
9. California State University Office of the Chancellor. (2007). The CSU Ed.D. programs for educational leaders. Retrieved June 1, 2008, from www.calstate.edu/EdD.
10. Datnow Amanda, Hubbard Lea, Mehan Hugh., (1998). Educational Reform Implementation: A Co-Constructed Process. UC Berkeley: Center for Research on Education, Diversity and Excellence. Retrieved from: http://escholarship.org/uc/item/1470d2c8.
11. Elmore R., (2004). School reform from the inside out: Policy, practice, and performance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
12. Furman G., Grogan M., Sernak K., Osterman K., (2009). From promise to practice: Implementing the action research dissertation in educational leadership. Paper presented at the annual conference of University Council for Educational Administration (UCEA), Anaheim, CA.
13. Hall P., (1995). The consequences of qualitative analysis for sociological theory: Beyond the microlevel. Sociological Quarterly, 36(2), 397–423.
14. Hargreaves A., (1985). The micro-macro problem in the sociology of education. In Burgess R. G., (Ed.), Issues in educational research: Qualitative methods (pp. 21–47). London: The Falmer Press.
15. Hernandez N., Strauss V., (2008, October 2). In most school districts, the doctor is in charge, but some question degree. Washington Post, Retrieved January 20, 2011, from http://www.washingtonpost.com/wpdyn/content/article/2008/10/01/AR2008100102958.html.
16. Herr K., Anderson G. L., (2005). The action research dissertation: A guide for students and faculty. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17. Kahne J., (1996). Reframing educational policy. New York: Teachers College Press.
18. Levine A., (2005). Educating school leaders. New York: Education Schools Project, Teachers College, Columbia University. Retrieved April 1, 2005, from http://www.edschools.org/reports_leaders.htm.
19. Marsh D. D., Dembo M. H., (2009). Rethinking school leadership programs: The USC Ed.D. program in perspective. Peabody Journal of Education, 84(1), 69–85.
20. Merriam S., (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
21. Miles M. B., Huberman A. M., (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22. Murphy J., (2007April). Questioning the core of university-based programs for preparing school leaders. Phi Delta Kappan, 88(8), 582–585.
23. Painter S., Moore D., Zambo D., Buss. R., (2009). Faculty change to support an innovative Ed.D. program. Paper presented at the annual conference of the University Council for Educational Administration (UCEA), Anaheim, CA.
24. Peshkin A., (1988). In search of subjectivity—one's own. Educational Researcher, 17(7), 17–21.
25. Rubin H. J., Rubin I. S., (2005). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26. Shulman L., Golde C. M., Conklin Bueschel A., Garabedian K.J., (2006April). Reclaiming education's doctorates: A critique and a proposal. Educational Researcher, 35(3), 25–32.
27. Sirotnick K. A., Oakes J., (1990Spring). Evaluation as critical inquiry: School improvement as a case in point. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 45, 37–59.
28. Smrekar C., (2008). The professional doctorate in educational leadership: Three alternatives to the traditional dissertation. Panel discussion presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.
29. Wenger E., (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
30. Young M. D., (2006). The M. Ed., Ed.D., and Ph.D. in educational leadership. UCEA Review, 45(2), 6–9.