Model-based simulation for early neurosurgical learners

Neurosurgery

Volumn 73, Issue SUPPL. 4, 2013, Pages

  Selden, Nathan R ^a   Origitano, Thomas C ^b   Hadjipanayis, Costas ^c   Byrne, Richard ^d  

^a OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO   (United States)

^c EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d RUSH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Early learners; Models; Neurosurgery; Residency; Simulation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAIN VENTRICLE PERITONEUM SHUNT; CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETER; CRANIOPLASTY; CRANIOTOMY; DRILL; EDUCATION PROGRAM; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE; INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE MONITORING; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MODEL BASED SIMULATION; NEUROSURGERY; POSTGRADUATE EDUCATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESIDENCY EDUCATION; RESIDENT; SIMULATION; SIMULATOR; SURGICAL TECHNOLOGY; SURGICAL TRAINING; VENTRICULOSTOMY CATHETER;

BRAIN; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CRANIOTOMY; CURRICULUM; DATA COLLECTION; DURA MATER; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; HUMANS; INTERNET; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; MODELS, ANATOMIC; NEUROSURGERY;

EID: 84885003132     PISSN: 0148396X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000058     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Fitzgibbons SC, Chen J, Jagsi R, Weinstein D. Long-term follow-up on the educational impact of ACGME duty hour limits: a pre-post survey study. Ann Surg. 2012;256(6):1108-1112.
2. Fletcher KE, Nickoloff S, Whittle J, Jackson JL, Frank M, Schapira MM. Why residents consider working beyond the duty hour limits: implications of the ACGME 2011 Duty Hour Standards. J Grad Med Educ. 2011;3(4):571-573.
3. Philibert I, Nasca T, Brigham T, Shapiro J. Duty-hour limits and patient care and resident outcomes: can high-quality studies offer insight into complex relationships? Annu Rev Med. 2013;64:467-483.
4. Wachter RM, Pronovost PJ. The 100,000 Lives Campaign: a scientific and policy review. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2006;32(11):621-627.
5. Institute for Healthcare Improvement. Protecting 5 million lives from harm. http://www.ihi.org/offerings/Initiatives/PastStrategicInitiatives/ 5MillionLivesCampaign/Pages/default.aspx. Accessed April 4, 2013.
6. Danzer E, Dumon K, Kolb G, et al. What is the cost associated with the implementation and maintenance of an ACS/APDS-based surgical skills curriculum? J Surg Educ. 2011;68(6):519-525.
7. Goodman Simulation Center. http://goodmancenter.stanford.edu/. Accessed April 4, 2013.
8. Penn State Hershey Clinical Simulation Center. http://www. pennstatehershey. org/web/simulation. Accessed April 4, 2013.
9. McLachlan JC, Patten D. Anatomy teaching: ghosts of the past, present and future. Med Educ. 2006;40(3):243-253.
10. Meller G, Tepper R, Bergman M, Anderhub B. The tradeoffs of successful simulation. Stud Health Technol Inform. 1997;39:565-571.
11. Chaudhry A, Sutton C, Wood J, Stone R, McCloy R. Learning rate for laparoscopic surgical skills on MIST VR, a virtual reality simulator: quality of human-computer interface. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1999;81(4):281-286. (Pubitemid 29346677)
12. Coates PJ, Zealley IA, Chakraverty S. Endovascular simulator is of benefit in the acquisition of basic skills by novice operators. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010;21(1):130-134.
13. Duffy AJ, Hogle NJ, McCarthy H, et al. Construct validity for the LAPSIM laparoscopic surgical simulator. Surg Endosc. 2005;19(3):401-405. (Pubitemid 40897943)
14. Grantcharov TP, Kristiansen VB, Bendix J, Bardram L, Rosenberg J, Funch-Jensen P. Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training. Br J Surg. 2004;91(2):146-150. (Pubitemid 38233958)
15. Hyltander A, Liljegren E, Rhodin PH, Lönroth H. The transfer of basic skills learned in a laparoscopic simulator to the operating room. Surg Endosc. 2002;16 (9):1324-1328. (Pubitemid 34988740)
16. Sherman V, Feldman LS, Stanbridge D, Kazmi R, Fried GM. Assessing the learning curve for the acquisition of laparoscopic skills on a virtual reality simulator. Surg Endosc. 2005;19(5):678-682. (Pubitemid 40898013)
17. Banerjee PP, Luciano CJ, Lemole GM Jr, Charbel FT, Oh MY. Accuracy of ventriculostomy catheter placement using a head-and hand-tracked highresolution virtual reality simulator with haptic feedback. J Neurosurg. 2007;107 (3):515-521. (Pubitemid 47451033)
18. Aucar JA, Groch NR, Troxel SA, Eubanks SW. A review of surgical simulation with attention to validation methodology. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2005;15(2):82-89. (Pubitemid 40594406)
19. Selden NR, Barbaro N, Origitano TC, Burchiel KJ. Fundamental skills for entering neurosurgery residents: report of a Pacific region "boot camp" pilot course, 2009. Neurosurgery. 2011;68(3):759-764.
20. Selden NR, Origitano TC, Burchiel KJ, et al. A national fundamentals curriculum for neurosurgery PGY1 residents: the 2010 Society of Neurological Surgeons boot camp courses. Neurosurgery. 2012;70(4):971-981.
21. Selden N, Anderson V, McCartney S, Origitano TC, Burchiel KJ, Barbaro N. Society of Neurological Surgeons boot camp courses: knowledge retention and relevance of hands on learning after 6 months of postgraduate year 1 training [published online ahead of print April 6, 2013]. J Neurosurg. doi:10.3171/2013.3. JNS122114.
22. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Neurological surgery case log defined case categories and required minimum numbers. http://www.acgme. org/acgmeweb/Portals/0/PFAssets/ProgramResources/ Final%20Defined%20Case %20Categories%20and%20Required%20Minimum%20Numbers.pdf. Accessed April 4, 2013.
23. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Frequently asked questions: neurological surgery, Review Committee for Neurological Surgery 2012. http://www. acgme.org/acgmeweb/Portals/0/PDFs/FAQ/160-neurological-surgery- FAQs-07012013.pdf. Accessed April 4, 2013.
24. Society of Neurological Surgeons. PGY1 boot camp courses. http://societyns. org/bootcamp/bootcampcourses.asp. Accessed April 4, 2013.
25. Duschek N, Assadian A, Lamont PM, et al. Simulator training on pulsatile vascular models significantly improves surgical skills and the quality of carotid patch plasty. J Vasc Surg. 2013;57(4):1148-1154.
26. Dong Y, Suri HS, Cook DA, et al. Simulation-based objective assessment discerns clinical proficiency in central line placement: a construct validation. Chest. 2010; 137(5):1050-1056.
27. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Proposed standards. 2011. http://acgme-2010standards.org/proposed-standards.html. Accessed April 4, 2013.
28. Fernandez GL, Page DW, Coe NP, et al. Boot cAMP: educational outcomes after 4 successive years of preparatory simulation-based training at onset of internship. J Surg Educ. 2012;69(2):242-248.
29. Sutton E, Chase SC, Klein R, et al. Development of simulator guidelines for resident assessment in flexible endoscopy. Am Surg. 2013;79(1):14-22.
30. Malone HR, Syed ON, Downes MS, D'Ambrosio AL, Quest DO, Kaiser MG. Simulation in neurosurgery: a review of computer-based simulation environments and their surgical applications. Neurosurgery. 2010;67(4):1105-1116.
31. Spiotta A, Schlenk R. Simulation in neurosurgical residency training: a new paradigm. CNS Q. 2011;18-20.
32. Harrop J, Sharan A, Traynells V. Spine simulation. CNS Q. 2011;12-13.
33. Yudkowsky R, Luciano C, Banerjee P, et al. Practice on an augmented reality/haptic simulator and library of virtual brains improves resident's ability to perform a ventriculostomy. Simul Healthc. 2013;8(1):25-31.
34. Selden NR, Abosch A, Harbaugh RE, et al. Neurosurgery milestones. J Grad Med Educ. In press.
35. Swing S, Beeson M, Carraccio C, et al. Educational milestone development in 7 specialties entering the next accreditation system. J Grad Med Educ. In press.
36. Choudhury N, Gélinas-Phaneuf N, Delorme S, Del Maestro R. Fundamentals of neurosurgery: virtual reality tasks for training and evaluation of technical skills [published online ahead of print November 23, 2012]. World Neurosurg. doi:10. 1016/j.wneu.2012.08.022.
37. Mori K, Yamamoto T, Nakao Y, Esaki T. Development of artificial cranial base model with soft tissues for practical education: technical note. Neurosurgery. 2010; 66(6 suppl operative):339-341.
38. Tsang JS, Naughton PA, Leong S, Hill AD, Kelly CJ, Leahy AL. Virtual reality simulation in endovascular surgical training. Surgeon. 2008;6(4):214-220.
39. Aoun S, Bendok B, Mocco J, Levy EI. Simulation in vascular neurosurgery. CNS Q. 2011;9-11.
40. Aggarwal R, Black SA, Hance JR, Darzi A, Cheshire NJ. Virtual reality simulation training can improve inexperienced surgeon's endovascular skills. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2006;31(6):588-593. (Pubitemid 43792948)
41. Dawson DL, Meyer J, Lee ES, Pevec WC. Training with simulation improves resident's endovascular procedure skills. J Vasc Surg. 2007;45(1):149-154. (Pubitemid 46038666)
42. Hsu JH, Younan D, Pandalai S, et al. Use of computer simulation for determining endovascular skill levels in a carotid stenting model. J Vasc Surg. 2004;40(6):1118-1125. (Pubitemid 40037279)
43. Chaer RA, Derubertis BG, Lin SC, et al. Simulation improves resident performance in catheter-based intervention: results of a randomized, controlled study. Ann Surg. 2006;244(3):343-352.
44. Eftekhar B, Ghodsi M, Ketabchi E, Rasaee S. Surgical simulation software for insertion of pedicle screws. Neurosurgery. 2002;50(1):222-223.
45. Klein S, Whyne CM, Rush R, Ginsberg HJ. CT-based patient-specific simulation software for pedicle screw insertion. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2009;22(7):502-506.
46. LeeDH, Lee SW, Kang SJ, et al. Optimal entry points and trajectories for cervical pedicle screw placement into subaxial cervical vertebrae. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(6):905-911.
47. Anderson P. Surgical simulation: dural repair. CNS Q. 2011;16-17.
48. Mori K, Yamamoto T, Nakao Y, Esaki T. Surgical simulation of cerebral revascularization via skull base approaches in the posterior circulation using threedimensional skull model with artificial brain and blood vessels. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2011;51(2):93-96.
49. Prevedello D, Stredney D, Rezal A. Skull base simulators: the evolution of neurosurgical training. CNS Q. 2011;7-8.
50. Lee JT, QiuM, TeshomeM, Raghavan SS, Tedesco MM, Dalman RL. The utility of endovascular simulation to improve technical performance and stimulate continued interest of preclinical medical students in vascular surgery. J Surg Educ. 2009;66(6):367-373.