Essential terrestrial variable data workflows for distributed water resources modeling

Environmental Modelling and Software

Volumn 50, Issue , 2013, Pages 85-96

  Leonard, Lorne ^a   Duffy, Christopher J ^a  

^a The Pennsylvania State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Data workflow; Distributed hydrologic model; Essential Terrestrial Variables; Geographic information systems; HydroTerre; PIHM; Web services

Indexed keywords

DATA WORKFLOW; DISTRIBUTED HYDROLOGIC MODEL; ESSENTIAL TERRESTRIAL VARIABLES; HYDROTERRE; PIHM;

CATCHMENTS; DATA FUSION; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; GROUNDWATER; LANDFORMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; RUNOFF; STATISTICAL TESTS; SURFACE WATER RESOURCES; TOOLS; WEB SERVICES; WEBSITES;

INFORMATION MANAGEMENT;

CATCHMENT; CLIMATE CHANGE; DATA PROCESSING; DATA SET; GIS; HYDROGRAPHIC SURVEY; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; NUMERICAL MODEL; STREAMWATER; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER RESOURCE; WATERSHED;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 84884924059     PISSN: 13648152     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.09.003     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Alexander, et al. Variability in Monthly Flows in Streams of the Susquehanna River Basin: Process Insights from Spatially Referenced Watershed Modeling 2012, American Geophysical Union, (Fall Meeting).
2. Bhatt G., Kumar M., Duffy C.J. Bridging the gap between geohydrologic data and distributed hydrologic modeling iEMSs 2008. International Congress on Environmental Modelling and Software Integrating Sciences and Information Technology for Environmental Assessment and Decision Making. Proceedings 2008, International Environmental Modelling and Software Society (iEMSs). M. Sànchez-Marrè, J. Béjar, J. Comas, A. Rizzoli, G. Guariso (Eds.).
3. Curl, 2011. Retrieved September 20, 2011 from:. http://curl.haxx.se/.
4. EnviroGRIDS WP4 Hydrological Models 2013, Retrieved August 13, 2013 from:. http://envirogrids.net/.
5. ESRI Geoprocessing Considerations for Shapefile Output 2011, Retrieved September 20, 2011 from:. http://resources.esri.com/help/9.3/ArcGISDesktop/com/Gp_ToolRef/geoprocessing_tool_reference/geoprocessing_considerations_for_shapefile_output.htm.
6. Fielding R. Architectural Styles and the Design of Network-bases Software Architectures 2000, (Doctor of Philosophy dissertation), University of California, Irvine.
7. GDAL Geospatial Data Abstraction Library 2011, Retrieved August 1, 2010 from:. http://www.gdal.org/.
8. Goodall J., Horsburgh J., Whiteaker T., Maidment D., Zaslavsky I. Afirst approach to web services for the national water information system. Environ. Model. Softw. 2008, 23(4):404-411.
9. Goodall J., Robinson B., Castronova A. Modeling water resource systems using a service-oriented computing paradigm. Environ. Model. Softw. 2011, 26(5):573-582.
10. Granell Carlos, Díaz Laura, Gould Michael Service-oriented applications for environmental models: reusable geospatial services. Environ. Model. Softw. February 2010, 25(2):182-198.
11. Gray J., Liu D.T., Nieto-Santisteban M.A., Szalay A.S., Heber G., DeWitt D. Scientific data management in the coming decade. ACM SIGMOD Rec. 2005, 34(4):35-41. Also MSR-TR-2005-10. 10.1145/1107499.1107503.
12. Hearn D., Baker M. Computer Graphics C Version 1997, Prentice Hall.
13. Horsburgh J.S., Tarboton D.G., Piasecki M., Maidment D.R., Zaslavsky I., Valentine D., Whitenack T. An integrated system for publishing environmental observations data. Environ. Model. Softw. 2009, 24(8):879-888.
14. Kollet S.J., Maxwell R.M. Integrated surface-groundwater flow modeling: a free-surface overland flow boundary condition in a parallel groundwater flow model. Adv. Water Resour. 2006, 29(7):945-958.
15. Kumar M., Duffy C.J. An object oriented shared data model for GIS and distributed hydrologic models. IJGIS 2010, 24(7):1061-1079.
16. Kumar M., Bhatt G., Duffy C.J. An efficient domain decomposition framework for accurate representation of geodata in distributed hydrologic models. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 2008, 1569-1596. (IJGIS-2008-0069.R1).
17. Kumar M., Duffy C., Salvage K. Asecond-order accurate, finite volume-based, integrated hydrologic modeling (FIHM) framework for simulation of surface and subsurface flow. Vadose Zone J. 2009, 8:873-890.
18. LeVeque Randall Numerical Methods for Conservation Laws. ETH Lectures in Mathematics Series 1990, Birkhauser-Verlag.
19. Martinec J., Rango A., Roberts R. The snowmelt runoff model (SRM) user's manual. Geographica Bernensia 1994, 29. Department of Geography, Univ. of Berne, Berne, Switzerland. http://hydrolab.arsusda.gov/%7Erroberts/srmmanual/srmman.html, M.F. Baumgartner (Ed.).
20. MODIS Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer 2011, Retrieved December 5th, 2010 from:. http://modis.gsfc.nasa.gov/about/.
21. Mohr Karen I., Tao Wei-Kuo., Chern Jiun-Dar., Kumar Sujay V., Peters-Lidard Christa D. The NASA-Goddard multi-scale modeling framework-land information system: global land/atmosphere interaction with resolved convection. Environ. Model. Softw. January 2013, 39:103-115.
22. NARR North American Regional Reanalysis Homepage 2011, December 5th, 2010 from:. http://www.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/mmb/rreanl/.
23. National Research Council Big Data: a Workshop Report 2012, 23. The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C. http://www.nap.edu.
24. Nativi Stefano., Mazzetti Paolo., Geller Gary N. Environmental model access and interoperability: the GEO model web initiative. Environ. Model. Softw. January 2013, 39:214-228.
25. NHD USGS National Hydrography Dataset 2013, Retrieved January 6th, 2013, from:. http://nhd.usgs.gov/.
26. NLCD National Land Cover Database, Multi-resolution Land Characteristics Consortium 2011, Retrieved on October 7th, 2012 from:. http://www.mrlc.gov/.
27. NLDAS North American Land Data Assimilation System 2011, December 5th, 2010 from:. http://ldas.gsfc.nasa.gov/nldas/NLDAS2forcing.php.
28. Palacios-Velez O., Cuevas-Renaud B. Automated river-course, ridge and basin delineation from digital elevation data. J.Hydrol. 1986, 86:299-314.
29. Parajka J., Merz R., Bloschl G. Acomparison of regionalisation methods for catchment model parameters. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2005, 9:p157-171.
30. Polis M.F., McKeown D.M. Issues in iterative TIN generation to support large scale simulations. Proc. of Auto-carto 11 1993.
31. Qu Y., Duffy C.J. Asemi-discrete finite volume formulation for multiprocess watershed simulation. Water Resour. Res. 2007, 43:W08419. 10.1029/2006WR005752.
32. Shewchuk J.R. Delaunay Refinement Mesh Generation 1997, (Ph.D. thesis), Carnegie Mellon Univ., Pittsburgh, Pa.
33. SSURGO Soil Survey Geographic Database 2011, Retrieved August 1st, 2010, from:. http://soils.usda.gov/survey/geography/ssurgo/.
34. STATSGO State Soil Geographic Database 2011, Retrieved August 1st, 2010, from:. http://soils.usda.gov/survey/geography/statsgo/.
35. SWAT Soil and Water Assessment Tool 2013, Retrieved January 6th, 2013, from:. http://swat.tamu.edu/.
36. Tarboton D.G. TauDEM: Hydrology Research Group 2011, Retrieved February 3rd 2011, from:. http://hydrology.usu.edu/taudem/taudem5.0/index.html.
37. Turuncoglu Ufuk Utku., Dalfes Nuzhet., Murphy Sylvia., DeLuca Cecelia. Toward self-describing and workflow integrated Earth system models: a coupled atmosphere-ocean modeling system application. Environ. Model. Softw. January 2013, 39:247-262.
38. USDA/NRCS National Cartography & Geospatial Center: Geospatial Data Gateway 2010, Retrieved July 12th, 2011, from:. http://datagateway.nrcs.usda.gov/.
39. USGS Seamless Data Warehouse 2011, Retrieved August 1st, 2010, from:. http://seamless.usgs.gov/.
40. USGS National Water Information System 2013, Retrieved January 6th, 2013, from:. http://nwis.waterdata.usgs.gov/usa/nwis/gwlevels.
41. White Tom Hadoop: the Definitive Guide 10 May 2012, 3. O'Reilly Media.
42. WMO GCOS, Global Climate Observing System, Implementation Plan for the Global Observing System for Climate in Support of the UNFCCC, GCOS-138 2010, 180.
43. Wosten J.H.M., Lilly A., Nemes A., Le Bas C. Using Existing Soil Data to Derive Hydraulic Parameters for Simulation Models in Environmental Studies and in Land Use Planning 1998, (Final Rep. Eur. Un., Wageningen).