Bridging the gap between geohydrologic data and distributed hydrologic modeling

Proc. iEMSs 4th Biennial Meeting - Int. Congress on Environmental Modelling and Software: Integrating Sciences and Information Technology for Environmental Assessment and Decision Making, iEMSs 2008

Volumn 2, Issue , 2008, Pages 743-750

  Bhatt, G ^a   Kumar, M ^a   Duffy, C J ^a  

^a The Pennsylvania State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Geographic information systems (GIS); Hydrologic model; Shavers creek; Susquehanna river basin

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS TIME; DATA FLOW; DATA GATHERING; DATA INTEGRITY; DATA INTERACTIONS; DATA REDUNDANCY; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS (GIS); HETEROGENEOUS DATA; HYDROLOGIC MODELING; HYDROLOGIC MODELS; OPEN-SOURCE; PENN STATE; PENNSYLVANIA; PHYSICALLY BASED; PLATFORM INDEPENDENT; PLUGGABLE ARCHITECTURE; RIVER BASINS; SHAVERS CREEK; SOFTWARE COMPONENT; SPACE AND TIME; STATE VARIABLES; SUSQUEHANNA RIVER BASIN;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; CLIMATOLOGY; DATA STRUCTURES; DATA VISUALIZATION; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; GROUNDWATER; HYDROGEOLOGY; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INTEGRATION; INTERFACE STATES; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; VISUALIZATION; WATERSHEDS;

DATA FLOW ANALYSIS;

EID: 84858331244     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Abel, D.J., and Kilby, P.J., The systems integration problem, International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 8(1):1-12, 1994. (Pubitemid 24401589)
2. Arctur, D., and Zeiler, M., Designing Geodatabases: Case Studies in GIS Data Modeling, ESRI Press, 2004.
3. Camara, G., Souza, R., Monteiro, A., Paiva, J., and Garrido, J., Handling complexity in GIS interface design, In Brazilian Symposium in Geoinformatics, Geoinfo, 1999.
4. Chew, P.L., Guaranteed-Quality Mesh Generation for Curved Surfaces, Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Symposium on Computational Geometry (San Diego, California), pages 274-280, Association for Computing Machinery, 1993.
5. David, D., Peucker, T., Algorithms for the reduction of the number of points required to represent a digitized line or its caricature, The Canadian Cartographer 10(2), 112-122, 1973.
6. Deckmyn, J., Paniconi, C., Giacomelli, A., and Kleinfeldt, S., A Modular Approach to Integrated Environmental Modeling Systems Incorporating GIS and Visualization Functionality, CRS4-TECH-REP-96/26, 1997.
7. Entekhabi, D. and Eagleson, P.S., Land surface hydrology parameterization for atmospheric General Circulation models including subgrid scale spatial variability, Journal of Climate, 2(8), 816-831, 1989.
8. Freeze, R.A., and Harlan, R.L., Blueprint for a physically-based digitally simulated, hydrologic response model, J. Hydrol., 9, 237-258, 1969.
9. Goodchild, M.F., Geographical information science. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 6(1): 31-45, 1992.
10. Kopp, S.M., Linking GIS and hydrological models: where have we been, where are we going? In: HydroGIS 96: Application of Geographic Information Systems in Hydrology and Water Resources, 13-21. IAHS Publ. no. 235, 1996.
11. Kumar M., Bhatt, G. and Duffy, C.J., An Object Oriented Shared Data Model Coupling. International journal of Geographic Information System, In preparation, 2008.
12. Kumar M., Bhatt, G. and Duffy, C.J., An efficient domain decomposition framework for accurate representation of geodata in distributed hydrologic models, In preparation, 2008.
13. Leveque, R.J., Finite Volume methods for hyperbolic problems. Cambridge University Press, 2002.
14. Madsen, N.K., The method of lines for the numerical solution of partial differential equations (abstract), ACM SIGNUM Newsletter, v.10 n.4, p.5-7, 1975.
15. Maidment, D.R., GIS and hydrological modeling. In M. F. Goodchild, B. Parks, & L. Steyaert, (Eds.), Environmental modeling with GIS (pp. 147-167). New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.
16. Nyerges, T.L., GIS Research Issues Identified During a Cartographic Standards Process, Proceedings, of International Symposium on Geographic Information Systems, 1987.
17. Nyerges, T.L., Understanding the scope of GIS: Its relationship to environmental modeling. In Environmental Modeling with GIS, edited by Goodchild, M.F., Parks, B.O. and Steyaert, T. (New York: Oxford University Press), pp. 75-93, 1993.
18. Pitman, A.J., Henderson-Sellers, A., and Yang, Z.L., Sensitivity of regional climates to localized precipitation in global models, Nature, 346, 734-737, 1990. (Pubitemid 120005981)
19. Qu, Y., Duffy, C.J., A semidiscrete finite volume formulation for multiprocess watershed simulation, Water Resour. Res., 43, W08419, doi:10.1029/2006WR005752, 2007. (Pubitemid 47509801)
20. Ruppert, J., A Delaunay Refinement Algorithm for Quality 2-Dimensional Mesh Generation, Journal of Algorithms 18(3):548-585, 1995.
21. Shewchuk, J.R., Triangle: Engineering a 2D Quality Mesh Generator and Delaunay Triangulator, in Applied Computational Geometry: Towards Geometric Engineering, volume 1148 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 203-222, Springer-Verlag (Berlin), 1996. (Pubitemid 126140158)
22. Sui, D.J. and Maggio, R.C., Integrating GIS with hydrological modelling: practices, problems and prospects, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 23, pages 33-51, 1999. (Pubitemid 29303409)
23. Tarboton, D.G., Bras, R.L., Rodriguez-Iturbe, I., On the Extraction of Channel Networks from Digital Elevation Data, Hydrologic Processes, 5(1): 81-100, 1991.
24. Watkins, D. W., McKinney, D. C., Maidment, D. R., and Lin, M., Use of geographic information systems in ground-water flow modeling, J. Water Resour. Plng. and Mgmt., ASCE, 122(2), 88-96, 1996
25. Wilson, J.P., Inskeep, W.P., Wraith, J.M., and Snyder, R.D., GIS-based solute transport modeling applications: Scale effects of soil and climate data input. Journal of Environmental Quality 25: 445-53, 1996. (Pubitemid 26158955)