A comparative study of the influence of three pure titanium plates with different micro- and nanotopographic surfaces on preosteoblast behaviors

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A

Volumn 101, Issue 11, 2013, Pages 3278-3284

  Zuo, Jun ^a,b   Huang, Xunzhi ^c   Zhong, Xiaoxia ^c   Zhu, Bangshang ^c   Sun, Qiang ^b   Jin, Chengyu ^c   Quan, Hongzhi ^a   Tang, Zhangui ^a   Chen, Wantao ^b  

^a CENTRAL SOUTH UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (China)

^c SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

dielectric barrier discharges; oral implant; osteoblast; surface topography; titanium

Indexed keywords

ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE ACTIVITY; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; COMMERCIALLY PURE TITANIUMS; COMPARATIVE STUDIES; DAYS AFTER SEEDING; DIELECTRIC BARRIER DISCHARGES; ORAL IMPLANTS; PURE TITANIUM PLATES;

CELL ADHESION; CELLS; DENTAL PROSTHESES; DIELECTRIC DEVICES; MATERIALS PROPERTIES; NANOTECHNOLOGY; OSTEOBLASTS; PHOSPHATASES; PLASMA APPLICATIONS; SURFACE TOPOGRAPHY; TITANIUM; TITANIUM PLATING;

SURFACES;

ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE; TITANIUM;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL ADHESION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SPREADING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; NONHUMAN; OSTEOBLAST; TOPOGRAPHY;

DIELECTRIC BARRIER DISCHARGES; ORAL IMPLANT; OSTEOBLAST; SURFACE TOPOGRAPHY; TITANIUM;

ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE; ANIMALS; CELL LINE; CELL MOVEMENT; CELL PROLIFERATION; FOCAL ADHESIONS; MICE; MICROSCOPY, ATOMIC FORCE; NANOSTRUCTURES; OSTEOBLASTS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM; WATER;

EID: 84884872007     PISSN: 15493296     EISSN: 15524965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.34612     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Adell R, Eriksson B, Lekholm U, Brånemark PI, Jemt T,. Long-term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990; 5: 347-359.
2. Buser D, Weber HP, Bragger U, Balsiger C,. Tissue integration of one-stage ITI implants: 3-year results of a longitudinal study with hollow-cylinder and hollow-screw implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991; 6: 405-412.
3. Steigenga JT, al-Shammari KF, Nociti FH, Misch CE, Wang HL,. Dental implant design and its relationship to long-term implant success. Implant Dent 2003; 12: 306-317.
4. Hof M, Tepper G, Semo B, Arnhart C, Watzek G, Pommer B,. Patients' perspectives on dental implant and bone graft surgery: Questionnaire-based interview survey. Clin Oral Implants Res. Forthcoming.
5. He F, Zhang F, Yang G, Wang X, Zhao S,. Enhanced initial proliferation and differentiation of MC3T3-E1 cells on HF/HNO3 solution treated nanostructural titanium surface. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010; 110: e13-e22.
6. Gahlert M, Gudehus T, Eichhorn S, Steinhauser E, Kniha H, Erhardt W,. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007; 18: 662-668.
7. Novaes AB Jr, de Souza SL, de Barros RR, Pereira KK, Iezzi G, Piattelli A,. Influence of implant surfaces on osseointegration. Braz Dent J 2010; 21: 471-481.
8. 2 grit-blasted c.p. titanium endosseous implants. Biomaterials 2006; 27: 926-936.
9. 2 grit blasted titanium implants on adherent osteoblast gene expression in vitro and in vivo. Biomaterials 2007; 28: 5418-5425.
10. Sato N, Kubo K, Yamada M, Hori N, Suzuki T, Maeda H, Ogawa T,. Osteoblast mechanoresponses on Ti with different surface topographies. J Dent Res 2009; 88: 812-816.
11. Sul YT, Kang BS, Johansson C, Um HS, Park CJ, Albrektsson T,. The roles of surface chemistry and topography in the strength and rate of osseointegration of titanium implants in bone. J Biomed Mater Res A 2009; 89: 942-950.
12. Valentin I, Gerhard J,. The development of dielectric barrier discharges in gas gaps and on surfaces. J Phys D: Appl Phys 2000; 33: 2618-2636.
13. Kogelschatz U,. Dielectric-barrier discharges: Their history, discharge physics, and industrial applications. Plasma Chem Plasma Process 2003; 23: 1-46.
14. Hench LL, Polak JM,. Third-generation biomedical materials. Science 2002; 295: 1014-1017.
15. Jell G, Stevens MM,. Gene activation by bioactive glasses. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2006; 17: 997-1002.
16. Kriparamanan R, Aswath P, Zhou A, Tang L, Nguyen KT,. Nanotopography: Cellular responses to nanostructured materials. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 2006; 6: 1905-1919.
17. 2-surfaces: Influence of surface topography and oxide thickness on leukocyte adhesion and activation. Biomaterials 2001; 22: 1987-1996.
18. Matschegewski C, Staehlke S, Loeffler R, Lange R,. Cell architecture-cell function dependencies on titanium arrays with regular geometry. Biomaterials 2010; 31: 5729-5740.
19. Anselme K,. Biomaterials and interface with bone. Osteoporos Int 2011; 12: 2037-2042.
20. Webster TJ, Ergun C, Doremus RH,. Enhanced functions of osteoblasts on nanophase ceramics. Biomaterials 2000; 21: 1803-1810.
21. Mendonça G, Mendonça DB, Simões LG, Araújo AL, Leite ER, Duarte WR, Aragão FJ, Cooper LF,. The effects of implant surface nanoscale features on osteoblast-specific gene expression. Biomaterials 2009; 30: 4053-4062.
22. Vetrone F, Variola F, Tambasco de Oliveira P, Zalzal SF, Yi JH, Sam J, Bombonato-Prado KF, Sarkissian A, Perepichka DF, Wuest JD, Rosei F, Nanci A,. Nanoscale oxidative patterning of metallic surfaces to modulate cell activity and fate. Nano Lett 2009; 9: 659-665.
23. Dalby MJ, Gadegaard N, Tare RS, Andar A, Riehle MO, Herzyk P, Wilkinson CDW, Oreffo ROC,. The control of human mesenchymal cell differentiation using nanoscale symetry and disorder. Nat Mater 2007; 6: 997-1003.
24. Hart A, Gadegaard N, Wilkinson CDW, Oreffo ROC, Dalby MJ,. Osteoprogenitor response to low-adhesion nanotopographies originally fabricated by electron beam lithography. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2007; 18: 1211-1218.
25. Biggs MJP, Richards RG, Gadegaard N, Wilkinson CDW, Dalby MJ,. The effects of nanoscale pits on primary human osteoblast adhesion formation and cellular spreading. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2007; 18: 399-404.
26. Matschegewski C, Staehlke S, Loeffler R, Lange R, Chai F, Kern DP, Beck U, Nebe BJ,. Cell architecture-cell function dependencies on titanium arrays with regular geometry. Biomaterials 2010; 31: 5729-5740.
27. Ismail FS, Rohanizadeh R, Atwa S, Mason RS, Ruys AJ, Martin PJ, Bendavid A,. The influence of surface chemistry and topography on the contact guidance of MG63 osteoblast cells. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2007; 18: 705-714.
28. Harnett EM, Alderman J, Wood T,. The surface energy of various biomaterials coated with adhesion molecules used in cell culture. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2007; 55: 90-97.
29. Liu XM, Lim JY, Henry J,. Influence of substratum surface chemistry/energy and topography on the human fetal osteoblastic cell line hFOB 1.19: Phenotypic and genotypic responses observed in vitro. Biomaterials 2007; 28: 4535-4550.
30. Olivares-Navarrete R, Hyzy SL, Park JH, Dunn GR, Haithcock DA, Wasilewski CE, Boyan BD, Schwartz Z,. Mediation of osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells on titanium surfaces by a Wnt-integrin feedback loop. Biomaterials 2011; 3: 6399-6411.
31. Zhao G, Raines AL, Wieland M, Schwartz Z, Boyan BD,. Requirement for both micron- and submicron scale structure for synergistic responses of osteoblasts to substrate surface energy and topography. Biomaterials 2007; 28: 2821-2829.
32. Boyan BD, Batzer R, Kieswetter K, Liu Y, Cochran DL, Szmuckler-Moncler S, Dean DD, Schwartz Z,. Titanium surface roughness alters responsiveness of MG63 osteoblast-like cells to 1 alpha,25-(OH)2D3. J Biomed Mater Res 1998; 39: 77-85.
33. Lai HC, Zhuang LF, Liu X, Wieland M, Zhang ZY,. The influence of surface energy on early adherent events of osteoblast on titanium substrates. J Biomed Mater Res A 2010; 93: 289-296.