Can social reference management systems predict a ranking of scholarly venues?

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 8092 LNCS, Issue , 2013, Pages 138-143

  Alhoori, Hamed ^a   Furuta, Richard ^a  

^a Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering   (United States)

Author keywords

Altmetrics; Bibliometrics; Citation Analysis; Digital Libraries; Google Scholar Metrics; Impact Factor; Ranking; Readership; Scholarly Venues; Social Reference Management

Indexed keywords

ALTMETRICS; BIBLIOMETRICS; CITATION ANALYSIS; GOOGLE SCHOLAR; IMPACT FACTOR; RANKING; READERSHIP; REFERENCE MANAGEMENT; SCHOLARLY VENUES;

DIGITAL LIBRARIES;

RESEARCH;

EID: 84884711635     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-40501-3_14     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Darmoni, S.J., Roussel, F., Benichou, J., Thirion, B., Pinhas, N.: Reading factor: a new bibliometric criterion for managing digital libraries. Journal of the Medical Library Association, JMLA 90, 323-327 (2002)
2. Neylon, C., Wu, S.: Article-Level Metrics and the Evolution of Scientific Impact. PLoS Biology 7(6) (2009)
3. Brody, T., Harnad, S., Carr, L.: Earlier Web usage statistics as predictors of later citation impact: Research Articles. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 57, 1060 (2006)
4. Rinia, E., Van Leeuwen, T., Bruins, E., Van Vuren, H., Van Raan, A.: Citation delay in interdisciplinary knowledge exchange. Scientometrics 51, 293-309 (2001)
5. González-Pereira, B., Guerrero-Bote, V.P., Moya-Anegón, F.: A new approach to the metric of journals' scientific prestige: The SJR indicator. Journal of Informetrics 4, 379-391 (2010)
6. Bergstrom, C.: Eigenfactor: Measuring the value and prestige of scholarly journals. CRL News 68, 314-316 (2007)
7. Serenko, A., Dohan, M.: Comparing the expert survey and citation impact journal ranking methods: Example from the field of Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Informetrics 5, 629-648 (2011)
8. Holsapple, C.W.: A Publication Power Approach for Identifying Premier Information Systems Journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 59, 166-185 (2008)
9. Zhuang, Z., Elmacioglu, E., Lee, D., Giles, C.L.: Measuring conference quality by mining program committee characteristics. In: Proceedings of the 7th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, pp. 225-234. ACM (2007)
10. Yan, S., Lee, D.: Toward alternative measures for ranking venues. In: Proceedings of the 7th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, pp. 235-244. ACM (2007)
11. Martins, W.S., Gonçalves, M.A., Laender, A.H.F., Pappa, G.L.: Learning to assess the quality of scientific conferences. In: Proceedings of the 9th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, pp. 193-202. ACM (2009)
12. Rahm, E., Thor, A.: Citation analysis of database publications. ACM SIGMOD Record, 48-53 (2005)
13. Bollen, J., Van de Sompel, H., Hagberg, A., Chute, R.: A principal component analysis of 39 scientific impact measures. PloS One 4, e6022 (2009)
14. Alhoori, H., Furuta, R.: Understanding the Dynamic Scholarly Research Needs and Behavior as Applied to Social Reference Management. In: Gradmann, S., Borri, F., Meghini, C., Schuldt, H. (eds.) TPDL 2011. LNCS, vol. 6966, pp. 169-178. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
15. Li, X., Thelwall, M., Giustini, D.: Validating online reference managers for scholarly impact measurement. Scientometrics 91, 461-471 (2011)
16. Kraker, P., Körner, C., Jack, K., Granitzer, M.: Harnessing user library statistics for research evaluation and knowledge domain visualization. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference Companion on World Wide Web - WWW 2012 Companion, pp. 1017-1024. ACM (2012)