Harnessing user library statistics for research evaluation and knowledge domain visualization

WWW'12 - Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference on World Wide Web Companion

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 1017-1023

  Kraker, Peter ^a   Körner, Christian ^b   Jack, Kris ^c   Granitzer, Michael ^d  

^a KNOW CENTER   (Austria)

^b GRAZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Austria)

^c ELSEVIER MASSON   (France)

^d UNIVERSITY OF PASSAU   (Germany)

Author keywords

Impact factors; Networks; Quantitative analysis; Readership; Science mapping; Social reference management; User library statistics

Indexed keywords

CO-OCCURRENCE; EMPIRICAL STUDIES; IMPACT FACTOR; KNOWLEDGE DOMAIN VISUALIZATION; LARGE-SCALE IMPACTS; LIBRARY DATA; LIBRARY STATISTICS; READERSHIP; REFERENCE MANAGEMENT; RESEARCH EVALUATION; SCIENCE EVALUATION; TECHNOLOGY ENHANCED LEARNING; WEALTH OF INFORMATION;

CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; LIBRARIES; NETWORKS (CIRCUITS); VISUALIZATION; WORLD WIDE WEB;

STATISTICS;

EID: 84861086060     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2187980.2188236     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. C. Bartneck and S. Kokkelmans. Detecting h-index manipulation through self-citation analysis. Scientometrics, 87(1):85-98, 2011.
2. J. Bollen, M. Rodriguez, and H. Van de Sompel. MESUR: usage-based metrics of scholarly impact. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries, pages 474-474. ACM, 2007.
3. J. Bollen and H. van de Sompel. Mapping the structure of science through usage. Scientometrics, 69(2):227-258, 2006.
4. F. Chang, J. Dean, S. Ghemawat, W. C. Hsieh, D. A. Wallach, M. Burrows, T. Chandra, A. Fikes, and R. E. Gruber. Bigtable: A Distributed Storage System for Structured Data. In Proceedings of the 7th USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation. ACM, 2008.
5. K.-C. Chang, D.-Z. Chen, and M.-H. Huang. The relationships between the patent performance and corporation performance. Journal of Informetrics, 6(1):131-139, 2012.
6. C. Chen and L. Carr. Trailblazing the literature of hypertext: author co-citation analysis (1989-1998). In Proceedings of the Tenth ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia, pages 51-60, New York, 1999. ACM.
7. L.-C. Chen and Y.-H. Lien. Using author co-citation analysis to examine the intellectual structure of e-learning: A MIS perspective. Scientometrics, 89(3):867-886, 2011.
8. S. Darmoni, F. Roussel, J. Benichou, B. Thirion, and N. Pinhas. Reading factor: a new bibliometric criterion for managing digital libraries. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 90(3):323-327, 2002.
9. J. Dean and S. Ghemawat. MapReduce : Simplified Data Processing on Large Clusters. Communications of the ACM, 51(1):1-13, 2004.
10. M. Fisichella, E. Herder, I. Marenzi, and W. Nejdl. Who are you working with? - Visualizing TEL Research Communities. In Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, pages 283-292, 2010.
11. J. A. Hammerton, M. Granitzer, D. Harvey, M. Hristakeva, and K. Jack. On generating large-scale ground truth datasets for the deduplication of bibliographic records. In International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics 2012, submitted.
12. S. Haustein and T. Siebenlist. Applying social bookmarking data to evaluate journal usage. Journal of Informetrics, 5(3):446-457, 2011.
13. V. Henning and J. Reichelt. Mendeley - A Last.fm For Research? IEEE Fourth International Conference on eScience, pages 327-328, 2008.
14. J. Jiang, D. He, and C. Ni. Social reference: aggregating online usage of scientific literature in CiteULike for clustering academic resources. In Proceeding of the 11th Annual International ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital libraries, pages 401-402. ACM, 2011.
15. J. M. Kleinberg. Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment. J. ACM, 46:604-632, 1999.
16. K. Kousha, M. Thelwall, and S. Rezaie. Using the Web for research evaluation: The Integrated Online Impact indicator. Journal of Informetrics, 4(1):124-135, 2010.
17. P. Kraker and S. Lindstaedt. Research Practices on the Web in the Field of Technology Enhanced Learning. In Proceedings of the ACM WebSci'11, Koblenz, Germany, 2011.
18. X. Li, M. Thelwall, and D. Giustini. Validating online reference managers for scholarly impact measurement. Scientometrics, 2011.
19. K. W. Mccain. Mappping Authors in Intellectual Space: A Technical Overview. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(6):433-443, 1990.
20. L. I. Meho and K. Yang. Impact of Data Sources on Citation Counts and Rankings of LIS Faculty: Web of Science Versus Scopus and Google Scholar. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 58(13):2105-2125, 2007.
21. T. Murray. Authoring Intelligent Tutoring Systems: An Analysis of the State of the Art. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 10(1):98-129, 1999.
22. D. J. D. S. Price. Little science, big science. Columbia Univ. Press, New York, 1963.
23. J. Priem and B. M. Hemminger. Scientometrics 2.0: Toward new metrics of scholarly impact on the social Web. First Monday, 15(7), 2010.
24. I. Rowlands and D. Nicholas. The missing link: journal usage metrics. Aslib Proceedings, 59(3):222-228, 2007.
25. C. Schloegl and J. Gorraiz. Comparison of citation and usage indicators: the case of oncology journals. Scientometrics, 82(3):567-580, 2010.
26. C. Schlögl. Bestandsaufnahme Informationsmanagement: Eine szientometrische, qualitative und empirische Analyse. Gabler, Wiesbaden, 2001.
27. H. Small. Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4):265-269, 1973.
28. M. Thelwall. Bibliometrics to webometrics. Journal of Information Science, 34(4):1-18, 2007.
29. M. Waldrop. Science 2.0. Scientific American, 298(5):46-51, 2008.
30. H. D. White and K. McCain. Bibliometrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 24:119-186, 1989.