A publication power approach for identifying premier information systems journals

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 59, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 166-185

  Holsapple, Clyde W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CITATION ANALYSES; MERIT DECISIONS; PUBLICATION POWER APPROACH;

DECISION MAKING; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; PROBLEM SOLVING; SEMANTICS;

ELECTRONIC PUBLISHING;

EID: 38849187855     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: 15322890     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.20679     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Amin, M., & Mabe, M. (2000). Impact factors: Use and abuse. Perspectives in Publishing, 1(October), 1-6.
2. Bapna, R., & Marsden, J. (2002). The paper chase: Comparing the research productivity of quantitative/technical departments in schools of business. OR/MS Today, 29(6), 34-39.
3. Dennis, A., Valacich, J., Fuller, M., & Schneider, C. (2006). Research standards for promotion and tenure in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 30(1), 1-12.
4. Garfield, E. (1996). How can impact factors be improved? British Medical Journal, 313(7054), 411-413.
5. Garfield, E. (1998). The impact factor and using it correctly. Der Unfallchirurg, 48(2), 413-114.
6. Hardgrave, B., & Walstrom, K. (1997). Forums for MIS scholars. Communications of the ACM, 40(11), 119-124.
7. Holsapple, C., Johnson, L., Manakyan, H., & Tanner, J. (1993). A citation analysis of business computing research journals. Information & Management, 25(5), 231-244.
8. Holsapple, C., Johnson, L., Manakyan, H., & Tanner, J. (1994a). Business computing research journals: A normalized citation analysis. Journal of Management Information Systems, 11(1), 131-140.
9. Holsapple, C., Johnson, L., Manakyan, H., & Tanner, J. (1994b). Business computing system research: Structuring the field. Omega: The International Journal of Management Science, 22(1), 69-81.
10. Jasco, P. (2001). A deficiency in the algorithm for calculating the impact factor of scholarly journals: The journal impact factor. Cortex, 37(4), 590-594.
11. Katerattanakul, P., Han, B., & Hong, S. (2003). Objective quality ranking of computing journals. Communications of the ACM, 46(10), 111-114.
12. Lowry, P., Romans, D., & Curtis, A. (2004). Global journal prestige and supporting disciplines: A scientometric study of information systems journals. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 5(2), 29-75.
13. Mylonopoulos, N., & Theoharakis, V. (2001). On-site: Global perceptions of IS journals. Communications of the ACM, 44(9), 29-33.
14. Rainer, K., & Miller, M. (2005). Examining differences across journal rankings. Communications of the ACM, 48(2), 91-94.
15. Saunders, C. (2006). Editor's comments. MIS Quarterly, 30(1), iii-vi.
16. Trieschmann, J.S., Dennis, A.R., Northcraft, G.B., & Niemi, A.W. (2000). Serving multiple constituencies in the business school: MBA program versus research performance. Academy of Management Journal, 43(6), 1130-1141.