Analysis of stress on mucosa and basal bone underlying complete dentures with different reliner material thicknesses: A three-dimensional finite element study

Journal of Oral Rehabilitation

Volumn 40, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 767-773

  Lima, J B G ^a   Orsi, I A ^b   Borie, E ^c,d   Lima, J H F ^a,b   Noritomi, P Y ^d  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF UBERLÂNDIA   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^c UNIVERSIDAD DE LA FRONTERA   (Chile)

^d CTI   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Biomechanics; Complete denture; Denture liners; Finite element analysis; Mouth mucosa

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; COMPLETE DENTURE; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DENTAL PROCEDURE; DENTURE LINER; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMAN; MANDIBLE; MECHANICAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; MOUTH MUCOSA; PHYSIOLOGY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

BIOMECHANICS; COMPLETE DENTURE; DENTURE LINERS; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; MOUTH MUCOSA;

COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; DENTURE LINERS; DENTURE, COMPLETE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MANDIBLE; MOUTH MUCOSA; STRESS, MECHANICAL;

EID: 84884701132     PISSN: 0305182X     EISSN: 13652842     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/joor.12086     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Lacoste-Ferre MH, Demont P, Dandurand J, Dantras E, Duran D, Lacabanne C. Dynamic mechanical properties of oral mucosa: comparison with polymeric soft denture liners. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2011;4:269-274.
2. Garcia LT, Jones JD. Soft liners. Dent Clin North Am. 2004;48:709-720.
3. Dayrell A, Takahashi J, Valverde G, Consani R, Ambrosano G, Mesquita M. Effect of sealer coating on mechanical and physical properties of permanent soft lining materials. Gerodontology. 2012;29:e401-e407.
4. Fujii K, Arikawa H, Kanie T, Ban S, Inoue M. Setting characteristics of silicone-based resilient denture liners. Dent Mater J. 2004;23:566-571.
5. Sato Y, Abe Y, Okane H, Tsuga K. Finite element analysis of stress relaxation in soft denture liner. J Oral Rehabil. 2000;27:660-663.
6. Hatamleh MM, Rodrigues FP, Silikas N, Watts DC. 3D-FE analysis of soft liner-acrylic interfaces under shear loading. Dent Mater. 2011;27:445-454.
7. Sevimay M, Usumez A, Eskitascioglu G. The influence of various occlusal materials on stresses transferred to implant-supported prostheses and supporting bone: a three-dimensional finite-element study. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2005;73:140-147.
8. Flanagan D, Ilies H, Lasko B, Stack J. Force and movement of non-osseointegrated implants: an in vitro study. J Oral Implantol. 2009;35:270-276.
9. Bacchi A, Consani RL, Mesquita MF, dos Santos MB. Influence of different mucosal resiliency and denture reline on stress distribution in peri-implant bone tissue during osseointegration. A three-dimensional finite element analysis. Gerodontology. 2012;29:e833-e837.
10. Dos Santos MB, Da Silva Neto JP, Consani RL, Mesquita MF. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of stress distribution in peri-implant bone with relined dentures and different heights of healing caps. J Oral Rehabil. 2011;38:691-696.
11. Geng JP, Tan KB, Liu GR. Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent. 2001;85:585-598.
12. Assuncao WG, Barao VA, Tabata LF, de Sousa EA, Gomes EA, Delben JA. Comparison between complete denture and implant-retained overdenture: effect of different mucosa thickness and resiliency on stress distribution. Gerodontology. 2009;26:273-281.
13. Gao J, Xu W, Ding Z. 3D finite element mesh generation of complicated tooth model based on CT slices. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2006;82:97-105.
14. Barao VA, Assuncao WG, Tabata LF, de Sousa EA, Rocha EP. Effect of different mucosa thickness and resiliency on stress distribution of implant-retained overdentures-2D FEA. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2008;92:213-223.
15. Lekholm U, Zarb GA. Patient selection and preparation. In: Branemark PI, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T, eds. Tissue integrated prostheses: osseointegration in clinical dentistry. Chicago (IL): Quintessence Publishing Co Inc.; 1985:199-209.
16. Bertassoni LE, Marshall GW, de Souza EM, Rached RN. Effect of pre- and postpolymerization on flexural strength and elastic modulus of impregnated, fiber-reinforced denture base acrylic resins. J Prosthet Dent. 2008;100:449-457.
17. Nishigawa G, Matsunaga T, Maruo Y, Okamoto M, Natsuaki N, Minagi S. Finite element analysis of the effect of the bucco-lingual position of artificial posterior teeth under occlusal force on the denture supporting bone of the edentulous patient. J Oral Rehabil. 2003;30:646-652.
18. Holmes DC, Diaz-Arnold AM, Leary JM. Influence of post dimension on stress distribution in dentin. J Prosthet Dent. 1996;75:140-147.
19. Chun HJ, Park DN, Han CH, Heo SJ, Heo MS, Koak JY. Stress distributions in maxillary bone surrounding overdenture implants with different overdenture attachments. J Oral Rehabil. 2005;32:193-205.
20. Shim JS, Watts DC. An examination of the stress distribution in a soft-lined acrylic resin mandibular complete denture by finite element analysis. Int J Prosthodont. 2000;13:19-24.
21. Kawano F, Ohguri T, Koran IA, Matsumoto N, Ichikawa T. Influence of lining design of three processed soft denture liners on cushioning effect. J Oral Rehabil. 1999;26:962-968.
22. Frost HM. A 2003 update of bone physiology and Wolff's Law for clinicians. Angle Orthod. 2004;74:3-15.
23. Koyama Y, Mitsui N, Suzuki N, Yanagisawa M, Sanuki R, Isokawa K et al. Effect of compressive force on the expression of inflammatory cytokines and their receptors in osteoblastic Saos-2 cells. Arch Oral Biol. 2008;53:488-496.
24. Parr GR, Rueggeberg FA. In vitro hardness, water sorption, and resin solubility of laboratory-processed and autopolymerized long-term resilient denture liners over one year of water storage. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;88:139-144.
25. Kawano F, Kon M, Koran A, Matsumoto N. Shock-absorbing behavior of four processed soft denture liners. J Prosthet Dent. 1994;72:599-605.