Osteochondral repair: Evaluation with sweep imaging with fourier transform in an equine model

Radiology

Volumn 269, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 113-121

  Rautiainen, Jari ^a,g   Lehto, Lauri J ^a   Tiitu, Virpi ^a   Kiekara, Outi ^a   Pulkkinen, Hertta ^a   Brun̈ott, Anne ^b   Van Weeren, René ^b   Brommer, Harold ^b   Brama, Pieter A J ^c   Ellermann, Jutta ^d   Kiviranta, Ilkka ^e,f   Nieminen, Miika T ^g,h   Nissi, Mikko J ^a,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EASTERN FINLAND   (Finland)

^b UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^f JYVÄSKYLÄ CENTRAL HOSPITAL   (Finland)

^g UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

^h OULU UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; ARTICULAR CARTILAGE; BONE VOLUME TO TISSUE VOLUME FRACTION; CARTILAGE INJURY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORTICAL BONE; CORTICAL THICKNESS (BONE); FOURIER TRANSFORMATION; HEALING; HISTOLOGY; HORSE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; JOINT SURGERY; MICRO-COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OSTEOCHONDRAL DEFECT; OSTEOCHONDRAL REPAIR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SUBCHONDRAL BONE PLATE; SWEEP IMAGING WITH FOURIER TRANSFORM; TRABECULAR BONE;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; FOURIER ANALYSIS; FRACTURE HEALING; FRACTURES, BONE; FRACTURES, CARTILAGE; HORSES; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; JOINTS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84884692825     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.13121433     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Hunziker EB. Articular cartilage repair: basic science and clinical progress - a review of the current status and prospects. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2002;10(6):432-463. (Pubitemid 34679298)
2. Roemer FW, Crema MD, Trattnig S, Guermazi A. Advances in imaging of osteoarthritis and cartilage. Radiology 2011;260(2):332-354.
3. Braun HJ, Gold GE. Diagnosis of osteoarthritis: imaging. Bone 2012;51(2):278-288.
4. Hildebrand T, Laib A, Müller R, Dequeker J, Rüegsegger P. Direct three-dimensional morphometric analysis of human cancellous bone: microstructural data from spine, femur, iliac crest, and calcaneus. J Bone Miner Res 1999;14(7):1167-1174. (Pubitemid 29314060)
5. Genant HK, Gordon C, Jiang Y, Lang TF, Link TM, Majumdar S. Advanced imaging of bone macro and micro structure. Bone 1999;25(1):149-152. (Pubitemid 29322081)
6. Patsch JM, Burghardt AJ, Kazakia G, Majumdar S. Noninvasive imaging of bone microarchitecture. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2011;1240:77-87.
7. Wehrli FW, Song HK, Saha PK, Wright AC. Quantitative MRI for the assessment of bone structure and function. NMR Biomed 2006;19(7):731-764. (Pubitemid 44811541)
8. Du J, Carl M, Bydder M, Takahashi A, Chung CB, Bydder GM. Qualitative and quantitative ultrashort echo time (UTE) imaging of cortical bone. J Magn Reson 2010;207(2):304-311.
9. Krug R, Larson PE, Wang C, et al. Ultrashort echo time MRI of cortical bone at 7 tesla field strength: a feasibility study. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011;34(3):691-695.
10. Rad HS, Lam SC, Magland JF, et al. Quantifying cortical bone water in vivo by three-dimensional ultra-short echo-time MRI. NMR Biomed 2011;24(7):855-864.
11. Robson MD, Gatehouse PD, Bydder M, Bydder GM. Magnetic resonance: an introduction to ultrashort TE (UTE) imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2003;27(6):825-846. (Pubitemid 37420776)
12. Idiyatullin D, Corum C, Park JY, Garwood M. Fast and quiet MRI using a swept radiofrequency. J Magn Reson 2006;181(2):342-349. (Pubitemid 44107748)
13. Idiyatullin D, Corum C, Moeller S, Garwood M. Gapped pulses for frequency-swept MRI. J Magn Reson 2008;193(2):267-273.
14. Garwood M, Idiyatullin D, Corum CA, et al. Capturing signals from fast-relaxing spins with frequency-swept MRI: SWIFT. EMagRes doi: 10.1002/9780470034590. emrstm1259. Published online June 15, 2012. Accessed Janurary 31, 2013.
15. McIlwraith CW, Fortier LA, Frisbie DD, Nixon AJ. Equine models of articular cartilage repair. Cartilage 2011;2(4):317-326.
16. Kulmala KAM, Pulkkinen HJ, Rieppo L, et al. Contrast-enhanced micro-computed tomography in evaluation of spontaneous repair of equine cartilage. Cartilage 2012;3(3):235-244.
17. Viren T, Huang YP, Saarakkala S, et al. Comparison of ultrasound and optical coherence tomography techniques for evaluation of integrity of spontaneously repaired horse cartilage. J Med Eng Technol 2012;36(3):185-192.
18. Nieminen MT, Nissi MJ, Mattila L, Kiviranta I. Evaluation of chondral repair using quantitative MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2012;36(6):1287-1299.
19. Corum C, Moeller S, Idiyatullin D, Garwood M. Signal processing and image reconstruction for SWIFT [abstr]. In: Proceedings of the Fifteenth Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Berkeley, Calif: International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2007; 1669.
20. Kiviranta I, Jurvelin J, Tammi M, Säämänen AM, Helminen HJ. Microspectrophotometric quantitation of glycosaminoglycans in articular cartilage sections stained with Safranin O. Histochemistry 1985;82(3):249-255. (Pubitemid 15114062)
21. McIlwraith CW, Frisbie DD, Kawcak CE, Fuller CJ, Hurtig M, Cruz A. The OARSI histopathology initiative: recommendations for histological assessments of osteoarthritis in the horse. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2010;18(Suppl 3):S93-S105.
22. Isaksson H, Töyräs J, Hakulinen M, et al. Structural parameters of normal and osteoporotic human trabecular bone are affected differently by microCT image resolution. Osteoporos Int 2011;22(1):167-177.
23. Parfitt AM, Drezner MK, Glorieux FH, et al. Bone histomorphometry: standardization of nomenclature, symbols, and units: report of the ASBMR Histomorphometry Nomenclature Committee. J Bone Miner Res 1987;2(6):595-610.
24. Buckwalter JA, Mankin HJ. Articular cartilage: degeneration and osteoarthritis, repair, regeneration, and transplantation. Instr Course Lect 1998;47:487-504.
25. Desjardins MR, Hurtig MB. Cartilage healing: a review with emphasis on the equine model. Can Vet J 1990;31(8):565-572.
26. Hunziker EB, Rosenberg LC. Repair of partial-thickness defects in articular cartilage: cell recruitment from the synovial membrane. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1996;78(5):721-733. (Pubitemid 26154259)
27. Nissi MJ, Lehto LJ, Corum CA, et al. Measurement of T1 relaxation time in articular cartilage using SWIFT [abstr]. In: Proceedings of the Eighteenth Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Berkeley, Calif: International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2010; 841.
28. Ellermann J, Idiyatullin D, Corum C, Moeller S, Ling W, Garwood M. The ultrastructure of bone using selective saturation in SWIFT at 9.4 T [abstr]. In: Proceedings of the Seventeenth Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Berkeley, Calif: International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2009; 849.
29. Kendi AT, Khariwala SS, Zhang J, et al. Transformation in mandibular imaging with sweep imaging with fourier transform magnetic resonance imaging. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011;137(9):916-919.
30. Du J, Bydder M, Takahashi AM, Carl M, Chung CB, Bydder GM. Short T2 contrast with three-dimensional ultrashort echo time imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 2011;29(4):470-482.
31. Nieminen MT, Töyräs J, Rieppo J, et al. Quantitative MR microscopy of enzymatically degraded articular cartilage. Magn Reson Med 2000;43(5):676-681. (Pubitemid 30244266)
32. Nissi MJ, Töyräs J, Laasanen MS, et al. Proteoglycan and collagen sensitive MRI evaluation of normal and degenerated articular cartilage. J Orthop Res 2004;22(3):557-564. (Pubitemid 38489733)
33. Liess C, Lüsse S, Karger N, Heller M, Glüer CC. Detection of changes in cartilage water content using MRI T2-mapping in vivo. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2002;10(12):907-913. (Pubitemid 35439415)
34. Du J, Takahashi AM, Bae WC, Chung CB, Bydder GM. Dual inversion recovery, ultrashort echo time (DIR UTE) imaging: creating high contrast for short-T(2) species. Magn Reson Med 2010;63(2):447-455.
35. Majumdar S, Newitt D, Mathur A, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of trabecular bone structure in the distal radius: relationship with x-ray tomographic microscopy and biomechanics. Osteoporos Int 1996;6(5):376-385. (Pubitemid 26355896)
36. Majumdar S, Kothari M, Augat P, et al. High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging: three-dimensional trabecular bone architecture and biomechanical properties. Bone 1998;22(5):445-454. (Pubitemid 28226857)
37. Lammentausta E, Kiviranta P, Töyräs J, et al. Quantitative MRI of parallel changes of articular cartilage and underlying trabecular bone in degeneration. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2007;15(10):1149-1157. (Pubitemid 47387050)
38. Krug R, Carballido-Gamio J, Burghardt AJ, et al. Assessment of trabecular bone structure comparing magnetic resonance imaging at 3 tesla with high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography ex vivo and in vivo. Osteoporos Int 2008;19(5):653-661.
39. Kim N, Lee JG, Song Y, Kim HJ, S Yeom J, Cho G. Evaluation of MRI resolution affecting trabecular bone parameters: determination of acceptable resolution. Magn Reson Med 2012;67(1):218-225.
40. Idiyatullin D, Corum C, Moeller S, Prasad HS, Garwood M, Nixdorf DR. Dental magnetic resonance imaging: making the invisible visible. J Endod 2011;37(6):745-752.