Common scale valuations across different preference-based measures: Estimation using rank data

Medical Decision Making

Volumn 33, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 839-852

  Hernández Alava, Mónica ^a   Brazier, John ^a   Rowen, Donna ^a   Tsuchiya, Aki ^a,b  

^a Health Services Research Section   (United Kingdom)

^b Department of Economics ^*  (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Normal error component logit mixture; Preferencebased mapping; Quality of life; Rank ordered mixed logit model

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; NORMAL ERROR COMPONENT LOGIT-MIXTURE; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PILOT STUDY; PREFERENCE-BASED MAPPING; QUALITY ADJUSTED LIFE YEAR; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANK-ORDERED MIXED LOGIT MODEL; THEORETICAL MODEL; UNITED KINGDOM;

NORMAL ERROR COMPONENT LOGIT-MIXTURE; PREFERENCE-BASED MAPPING; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANK-ORDERED MIXED LOGIT MODEL;

ENGLAND; HUMANS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PILOT PROJECTS; QUALITY-ADJUSTED LIFE YEARS;

EID: 84884636030     PISSN: 0272989X     EISSN: 1552681X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X13475716     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Longworth L, Bryan S. An empirical comparison of EQ-5D and SF-6D in liver transplant patients. Health Econ. 2003;12:1061-7.
2. O'Brien BJ, Spath M, Blackhouse G, Severens JL, Brazier JE. A view from the bridge: agreement between the SF-6D utility algorithm and the Health Utilities Index. Health Econ. 2003;12:975-82.
3. Brazier J, Roberts J, Tsuchiya A, Busschbach J. A comparison of the EQ-5D and SF-6D across seven patient groups. Health Econ. 2004;13:873-84.
4. Barton GR, Bankart J, Davis AC, Summerfield QA. Comparing utility scores before and after hearing aid provision: results according to the EQ-5D, HUI3 and SF-6D. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2004;3:103-5.
5. Espallargues M, Czoski-Murray C, Bansback N, et al. The impact of age related macular degeneration on health status utility values. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:4016-23.
6. Brazier JE, Yang Y, Tsuchiya A, Rowen DL. A review of studies mapping (or cross walking) non-preference based measures of health to generic preference-based measures. Eur J Health Econ. 2010;11:215-25.
7. McCabe C, Brazier J, Gilks P, et al. Using rank data to estimate health state utility models. J Health Econ. 2006;15:418-31.
8. Boyd JH, Mellman RE. The effect of fuel economy standards on the U.S. automotive market: an hedonic demand analysis. Transportation Res A. 1980;14:367-78.
9. Cardell NS, Dunbar FC. Measuring the societal impacts of automobile downsizing. Transportation Res A. 1980;14:423-34.
10. Rowen D, Brazier J, Tsuchiya A, Hernández M, Ibbotson R. The Simultaneous Valuation of States from Multiple Instruments Using Ranking and VAS Data: Methods and Preliminary Results. Health Economics and Decision Sciences Discussion Paper Series 09/06. Sheffield, UK: University of Sheffield; 2009.
11. Rowen D, Brazier J, Tsuchiya A, Hernández Alava M. Valuing states from multiple measures on the same VAS: a feasibility study. Health Econ. 2012;21:715-29.
12. Dolan P. Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med Care. 1997;35:1095-108.
13. Brazier J, Roberts J, Deverill M. The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. J Health Econ. 2002;21: 271-92.
14. Torrance GW, Feeny DH, Furlong WJ, Barr RD, Zhang Y, Wang Q. A multi-attribute utility function for a comprehensive health status classification system: Health Utilities Mark 2. Med Care. 1996;34:702-22.
15. Yang Y, Brazier J, Tsuchiya A, Young T. Estimating a preference-based index for a 5-dimensional health state classification for asthma derived from the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire. Med Decis Making. 2011;31:281-91.
16. Young T, Yang Y, Brazier J, Tsuchiya A. The use of Rasch analysis in reducing a large condition-specific instrument for preference valuation: the case of moving from AQLQ to AQL-5D. Med Decis Making. 2011;31:195-210.
17. Ryan M, Netten A, Skatun D, Smith P. Using discrete choice experiments to estimate a preference-based measure of outcome - an application to social care for older people. J Health Econ. 2006;25:927-44.
18. Coast J, Flynn T, Natarajan L, et al. Valuing the ICECAP capability index for older people. Soc Sci Med. 2008;67:874-82.
19. Luce RD. Individual Choice Behaviour. New York: John Wiley; 1959.
20. Plackett RL. The analysis of permutations. J R Stat Soc. 1975; 24:193-202.
21. Chapman RG, Staelin R. Exploiting rank ordered choice set data within the stochastic utility model. J Marketing Res. 1982; 14:288-301.
22. Allison PD, Christakis NA. Logit models for sets of ranked items. Sociol Method. 1994;24:199-228.
23. Breslow NE. Covariance analysis of censored survival data. Biometrics. 1974;30:89-100.
24. Efron B. The efficiency of Cox's likelihood function for censored data. J Am Stat Assoc. 1977;72:557-65.
25. Farewell VT, Prentice RL. The approximation of partial likelihood with emphasis on case-control studies. Biometrika. 1980;67: 273-78.
26. Calfee J, Winston C, Stempski R. Econometric issues in estimating consumer preferences from stated preference data: a case study of the value of automobile travel time. Rev Econ Stat. 2001; 83:699-707.
27. Srinivasan S, Bhat CR, Holguin-Veras J. An empirical analysis of the impact of security perception on intercity mode choice: a panel rank-ordered mixed logit model. Transportation Res Record. 2006;1942:9-15.
28. McFadden D, Train K. Mixed MNL models for discrete response. J Appl Econometrics. 2000;15:447-70.
29. Train KE. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2003.
30. Walker JL, Ben-Akiva M, Bolduc D. Identification of parameters in normal error component logit-mixture (NECLM) models. J Appl Econometrics. 2007;22:1095-125.
31. Andrews DWK. Testing when a parameter is on the boundary of the maintained hypothesis. Econometrica. 2001;69:683-734.
32. McCabe C, Stevens K, Roberts J, Brazier J. Health state values for the HUI 2 descriptive system: results from a UK survey. Health Econ. 2005;14:231-44.
33. Brazier J, Roberts J. The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-12. Med Care. 2004;42:851-9.
34. Chiou L, Walker JL. Masking identification of discrete choice models under simulation methods. J Econometrics. 2007;141: 683-703.