Health state values for the HUI 2 descriptive system: Results from a UK survey

Health Economics

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 231-244

  McCabe, Christopher ^a,b   Stevens, Katherine ^a   Roberts, Jennifer ^a   Brazier, John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Economic evaluation; Health utilities index; Valuation algorithm

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BODY MOVEMENT; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; ECONOMIC EVALUATION; EMOTION; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HEALTH STATUS; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MALE; MOBILIZATION; PAIN; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; STATISTICAL MODEL; UNITED KINGDOM; VALIDATION PROCESS; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

DATA COLLECTION; FEMALE; GREAT BRITAIN; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, STATISTICAL;

EID: 14944344802     PISSN: 10579230     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hec.925     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Feeny D, Furlong W, Barr RD, Torrance GW, Rosenbaum P, Weitzman S. A comprehensive multi-attribute system for classifying the health status of survivors of childhood cancer. J Clin Oncol 1992; 10(6): 923-928.
2. Cadman D, Goldsmith C, Torrance G, Boyle M, Furlong W. Development of a health status index for Ontario Children. Final Report, Ontario Ministry of Health Grant Research DM648 (00633), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, December 1986.
3. Torrance GW, Furlong W, Feeny D et al. Multi-attribute preference functions: health utilities index. Pharmacoeconomics 1995; 7(6): 503-520.
4. Torrance GW, Feeny DH, Furlong WJ, Barr RD, Zhang Y, Wang QA. Multi-attribute utility function for a comprehensive health status classification system: Health Utilities Mark 2. Med Care 1996; 34(7): 702-722.
5. Nord E. Validity of the visual analogue scale in determining social utility weights for health states. Int J Health Plan Manage 6: 234-242.
6. Robinson A, Dolan P, Williams A. Valuing health states using VAS and TTO; what lies behind the numbers? Social Sci Med 1997; 45: 1289-1297.
7. Morris J, Durand A. Category Rating Methods: Numerical and Verbal Scales. University of York, Centre for Health Economics, 1989.
8. Schwartz A. Rating scales in context. Med Decision Making 1998; 18: 236.
9. Robinson A, Loomes G, Jones-Lee M. Visual analogue scales, standard gambles and relative risk aversion. Med Decision Making 2001; 21: 17-27.
10. Bleichrodt H, Johanneson M. An experimental test of a theoretical foundation for rating-scale valuations. Med Decision Making 1997; 17: 208-216.
11. Dolan P, Sutton M. Mapping visual analogue scale scores on to time trade off and standard gamble utilities. Social Sci Med 1997; 44(10): 1519-1530.
12. van Busschback J. The validity of QALYs. PhD Thesis, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, 1994; cited in Dolan P. The measurement of health related quality of life for use in resource allocation decisions in health care. In: Handbook of Health Economics, Culyer AJ, Newhouse JP (eds). Elsevier Science BV: Amsterdam, 2000.
13. Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russell LB, Weinstein MC. Cost Effectiveness in Health Care and Medicine. Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1996.
14. Brazier J, Roberts J, Deverill M. The estimation of a preference based measure of health from the SF-36. J Health Econ 2002; 21(2): 271-292.
15. Furlong W, Feeny D, Torrance GW, Barr R, Horsman J. Guide to design and development of health state utility instrumentation. CHEPA Working Paper #90-9, McMaster University Hamilton, Ontario, 1990.
16. Dolan P. Modelling valuations for EuroQol Health States. Med Care 1997; 35(11): 1095-1108.
17. Dolan P. The measurement of health related quality of life for use in resource allocation decisions in health care. In Handbook of Health Economics, Culyer AJ, Newhouse JP (eds). Elsevier Science BV: Amsterdam, 2000.
18. Ljung G, Box G. On a measure of lack of fit in time series models. Biometrika 1979; 66: 265-270.
19. Feeny D, Furlong W, Torrance GW et al. Multi-attribute and single attribute utility functions for the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 system. Med Care 2002; 40(2): 113-128.
20. Brazier JE, Deverill M, Green C, Harper R, Booth A. A review of the use of health status measures in economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 1999; 3(9): 50-51.