Strength in numbers: How does data-driven decision-making affect firm performance?

International Conference on Information Systems 2011, ICIS 2011

Volumn 1, Issue , 2011, Pages 541-558

  Brynjolfsson, Erik ^a   Hitt, Lorin ^a   Kim, Heekyung ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84884617200     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1819486     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (49)

1. Anderson, M.C., Banker, R.D., and Ravindran, S. 2003. The New Productivity Paradox, Communications of the ACM (46:3), pp. 91-94.
2. Aral, Brynjolfsson, and Wu. 2009. Testing Three Way Complementarities: Performance Pay, Monitoring and Information Technology, ICIS.
3. Aral, S., Brynjolfsson, E., and Wu, D. 2006. Which Came First, It or Productivity? The Virtuous Cycle of Investment and Use in Enterprise Systems, International Conference on Information Systems, pp. 1-22.
4. Argote, L., McEvily, B., and Reagans, R. 2003. Managing Knowledge in Organizations: An Integrative Framework and Review of Emerging Themes, Management Science (49:4), pp. 571-582.
5. Attewell, P., and Rule, J. 1984. Computing and Organizations: What We Know and What We Don't Know, Communications of the ACM (27:12), pp. 1184-1192.
6. Ayres, I. 2008. Super Crunchers: Why Thinking-by-Numbers Is the New Way to Be Smart. Bantam.
7. Balasubramanian, N., and Lee, J. 2008. Firm Age and Innovation, Industrial and Corporate Change (17:5), p. 1019.
8. Barua, A., Kriebel, C.H., and Mukhopadhyay, T. 1995. Information Technologies and Business Value: An Analytic and Empirical Investigation, Information Systems Research (6:1), p. 3.
9. Blackwell, D. 1953. Equivalent Comparison of Experiments, Ann. Math. Statist. (24), pp. 265-272.
10. Bresnahan, T., Brynjolfsson, E., and Hitt, L. 2002. Information Technology, Workplace Organization, and the Demand for Skilled Labor: Firm-Level Evidence*, Quarterly Journal of Economics (117:1), pp. 339-376.
11. Bresnahan, T., Greenstein, S., and Henderson, R. 2009. Schumpeterian Competition and Diseconomies of Scope: Illustrations from Leading Historical Firms in Computing.
12. Brynjolfsson, E., Hitt, L., and Yang, S. 2002. Intangible Assets: How the Interaction of Computers and Organizational Structure Affects Stock Market Valuations, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Macroeconomics (1), pp. 137-199.
13. Brynjolfsson, E., and Hitt, L.M. 1996. Paradox Lost? Firm-Level Evidence of High Returns to the Information Systems Spending, Management Science (42:4).
14. Brynjolfsson, E., and Hitt, L.M. 2003. Computing Productivity: Firm-Level Evidence, Review of economics and statistics (85:4), pp. 793-808.
15. Brynjolfsson, E., Tambe, P., and Hitt, L. 2011. The Extroverted Firm: How External Information Practices Affect Productivity, Management Science (Forthcoming).
16. Clemons, E.K., and Thatcher, M.E. 1998. Capital One: Exploiting an Information-Based Strategy, IEEE, pp. 311-320 vol. 316.
17. Cohen, W.M., and Levinthal, D.A. 1989. Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R & D, The Economic Journal (99:397), pp. 569-596.
18. Davenport, T. 2009. How to Design Smart Business Experiments, Harvard Business Review), February.
19. Davenport, T.H., and Harris, J.G. 2007. Competing on Analytics: The New Science of Winning. Harvard Business Press.
20. Dewan, S., and Kraemer, K.L. 2000. Information Technology and Productivity: Evidence from Country-Level Data, Management Science), pp. 548-562.
21. Francalanci, C., and Galal, H. 1998. Information Technology and Worker Composition: Determinants of Productivity in the Life Insurance Industry, MIS Quarterly), pp. 227-241.
22. Galbraith, J.R. 1974. Organization Design: An Information Processing View, Interfaces (4:3), pp. 28-36.
23. Henderson, R. 1993. Underinvestment and Incompetence as Responses to Radical Innovation: Evidence from the Photolithographic Alignment Equipment Industry, The RAND Journal of Economics (24:2), pp. 248-270.
24. Henderson, R.M., and Clark, K.B. 1990. Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of Established Firms, Administrative Science Quarterly (35:1), pp. 9-30.
25. Hitt, L., and Brynjolfsson, E. 1997. Information Technology and Internal Firm Organization: An Exploratory Analysis, Journal of Management Information Systems (14:2), p. 101.
26. Hitt, L.M., and Brynjolfsson, E. 1996. Productivity, Business Profitability, and Consumer Surplus: Three Different Measures of Information Technology Value, Management Information Systems Quarterly (20:2).
27. Hitt, L.M., and Frei, F.X. 2002. Do Better Customers Utilize Electronic Distribution Channels? The Case of Pc Banking, Management Science), pp. 732-748.
28. Hitt, L.M., Wu, D., and Zhou, X. 2002. Investment in Enterprise Resource Planning: Business Impact and Productivity Measures, Journal of Management Information Systems (19:1), pp. 71-98.
29. Holmstrom, B., and Milgrom, P. 1991. Multitask Principal-Agent Analyses: Incentive Contracts, Asset Ownership, and Job Design, Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization (7:special issue), p. 24.
30. Huergo, E., and Jaumandreu, J. 2004. Firms' Age, Process Innovation and Productivity Growth, International Journal of Industrial Organization (22:4), pp. 541-559.
31. Jones, C.I. 1999. Growth: With or without Scale Effects?, The American Economic Review (89:2), pp. 139-144.
32. Jorgenson, D.W., and Stiroh, K.J. 1999. Information Technology and Growth, American Economic Review, Papers and Precedings (86:2).
33. Jorgenson, D.W., and Stiroh, K.J. 2000. U.S. Economic Growth at the Industry Level, American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings (90:2).
34. Lavalle, S., Hopkins, M.S., Lesser, E., Shockley, R., and Kruschwitz, N. 2010. Analytics: The New Path to Value, MIT Sloan Management Review (Fall).
35. Levitt, B., and March, J.G. 1988. Organizational Learning, Annual Review of Sociology (14), pp. 319-340.
36. Loveman, G. 2003. Diamonds in the Data Mine, Harvard Business Review (81:5), pp. 109-113.
37. McAfee, A. 2002. The Impact of Enterprise Information Technology Adoption on Operational Performance: An Empirical Investigation, Production and Operations Management (11:1), pp. 33-53.
38. McAfee, A., and Brynjolfsson, E. 2008. Investing in the It That Makes a Competitive Difference, Harvard Business Review (86:7/8), p. 98.
39. Melville, N., Kraemer, K., and Gurbaxani, V. 2004. Review: Information Technology and Organizational Performance: An Integrative Model of It Business Value, MIS Quarterly (28:2), pp. 283-322.
40. Nass, C. 1994. Knowledge or Skills: Which Do Administrators Learn from Experience?, Organization Science (5:1), pp. 38-50.
41. Oliner, S.D., and Sichel, D.E. 2000. The Resurgence of Growth in the Late 1990s: Is Information Technology the Story?, Federal Reserve Board Working Paper).
42. Pentland, A., and Pentland, S. 2008. Honest Signals: How They Shape Our World. The MIT Press.
43. Radner, R. 1993. The Organization of Decentralized Information Processing, Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society), pp. 1109-1146.
44. Saunders, A., and Brynjolfsson, E. 2010. Valuing It-Related Intangible Capital, Working Paper, MIT.
45. Shapiro, C., and Varian, H.R. 1999. Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy. Harvard Business Press.
46. Staiger, D., and Stock, J.H. 1997. Instrumental Variables Regression with Weak Instruments, Econometrica (65:3), pp. 557-586.
47. Tambe, P., Hitt, L., and Brynjolfsson, E. 2009. The Extroverted Firm: How External Information Practices Affect Productivity, working paper).
48. Tambe, P., and Hitt, L.M. 2011. The Productivity of Information Technology Investments: New Evidence from It Labor Data, SSRN eLibrary).
49. Tushman, M.L., and Anderson, P. 1986. Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments, Administrative Science Quarterly (31:3), pp. 439-465.