Crossdisciplinary research contributions to the United Kingdom's national ecosystem assessment

Ecosystem Services

Volumn 5, Issue , 2013, Pages 149-159

  Lawton, Ricky N ^a   Rudd, Murray A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Disciplinary networking; Ecosystem valuation; Interdisciplinary; Multidisciplinary; Research impacts; Transdisciplinary

Indexed keywords

EID: 84884587852     PISSN: 22120416     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.07.009     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Aboelela S.W., Larson E., Bakken S., Carrasquillo O., Formicola A., Glied S.A., Haas J., Gebbie K.M. Defining interdisciplinary research: conclusions from a critical review of the literature. Health Services Research 2007, 42:329-346.
2. Amara N., Ouimet M., Landry R. New evidence on instrumental, conceptual, and symbolic utilization of university research in government agencies. Science Communication 2004, 26:75-106.
3. Becher T., Trowler P.R. Academic Tribes and Territories 1989, Open University Press, Milton Keynes.
4. Beyer J.M. Research utilization: bridging a cultural gap between communities. Journal of Management Inquiry 1997, 6:17-22.
5. Bordons M., Zulueta M.A., Romero F., Barrigón S. Measuring interdisciplinary collaboration within a university: the effects of the multidisciplinary research programme. Scientometrics 1999, 46:383-398.
6. Bruce A., Lyall C., Tait J., Williams R. Interdisciplinary integration in Europe: the case of the fifth framework programme. Futures 2004, 36:457-470.
7. Bryman A. Barriers to integrating quantitative and qualitative research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 2007, 1:8-22.
8. Burt R.S. The contingent value of social capital. Administrative Science Quarterly 1997, 42:339-365.
9. Buscher B., Wolmer W. Introduction: the politics of engagement between biodiversity conservation and the social sciences. Conservation Society 2007, 5:1-21.
10. Carpenter Stephen R., Mooney H.A., Agard J., Capistrano D., DeFries R.S., Díaz S., Dietz Thomas, Duraiappah A.K., Oteng-Yeboah A, Pereira H.M., Perrings C., Reid Walter V., Sarukhan J., Scholes R.J., Whyte A. Science for managing ecosystem services: beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2009, 106:1305-1312.
11. Clark, R., 2007. Using Evidence to Inform Policy: The Role of Interpretation (No. 03), ERFF Report. Environmental Research Funders' Forum, Swindon, UK.
12. Committee on Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research 2005, The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C.
13. Cooperrider A.Y. Science as a model for ecosystem management-panacea or problem?. Ecological Applications 1996, 6:736-737.
14. Cortner H.J. Making science relevant to environmental policy. Environmental Science and Technology 2000, 3:21-30.
15. Cronon W. A place for stories: nature, history, and narrative. Journal of American History 1992, 78:1347.
16. Daily G.C., Polasky S., Goldstein J., Kareiva P.M., Mooney H.A., Pejchar L., Ricketts T.H., Salzman J., Shallenberger R. Ecosystem services in decision making: time to deliver. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2009, 7:21-28.
17. Davies H.T.O., Nutley S.M., Smith P.C. What Works? Evidence-Based Policy and Practice in Public Services 2000, The Policy Press, Bristol.
18. Evely A.C., Fazey I., Lambin X., Lambert E., Allen S., Pinard M. Defining and evaluating the impact of cross-disciplinary conservation research. Environmental Conservation 2010, 37:442-450.
19. Folke C., Pritchard L., Berkes F., Colding J., Svedin U. The problem of fit between ecosystems and institutions: ten years later. Ecology and Society 2007, 12:30.
20. Funtowicz S.O., Ravetz J.R. Science for the post-normal age. Futures 1993, 25:739-755.
21. Funtowicz S.O., Ravetz J.R. Uncertainty, complexity and post-normal science. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 1994, 13:1881-1885.
22. Gibbons M. The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies 1994, Sage Publications, UK.
23. Gibbs G.R. Qualitative Data Analysis: Explorations with NVivo 2002, Open University Publications, Maidenhead, UK.
24. Gómez-Baggethun E., De Groot R., Lomas P.L., Montes C. The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: from early notions to markets and payment schemes. Ecological Economics 2010, 69:1209-1218.
25. Gray B. Enhancing transdisciplinary research through collaborative leadership. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2008, 35:S124-S132.
26. Greaves J., Grant W. Crossing the interdisciplinary divide: political science and biological science. Political Studies 2010, 58:320-339.
27. Hajer M. Discourse coalitions and the institutionalization of practice: the case of acid rain in Great Britain. The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning 1993, 43-76. Duke University Press, Durham NC. F. Fischer, J. Forester (Eds.).
28. Jacobs, N., Amos, M., 2010. Removing Barriers to Interdisciplinary Research. CoRR abs/1012.4170.
29. Jahn T., Bergmann M., Keil F. Transdisciplinarity: between mainstreaming and marginalization. Ecological Economics 2012, 79:1-10.
30. Kinzig A.P. Bridging disciplinary divides to address environmental and intellectual challenges. Ecosystems 2001, 4:709-715.
31. Klein J.T. Interdisciplinarity: History, Theory, and Practice 1990, Wayne State University Press.
32. Klein J.T. Crossing Boundaries: Knowledge, Disciplinarities, and Interdisciplinarities 1996, University of Virginia Press, Virginia, V.A.
33. Klein J.T. Prospects for transdisciplinarity. Futures 2004, 36:515-526.
34. Klein J.T. Evaluation of interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2008, 35:116-223.
35. Kremen C. Managing ecosystem services: what do we need to know about their ecology?. Ecology Letters 2005, 8:468-479.
36. Laniak G.F., Olchin G., Goodall J., Voinov A., Hill M., Glynn P., Whelan G., Geller G., Quinn N., Blind M., Peckham S., Reaney S., Gaber N., Kennedy R., Hughes A. Integrated environmental modeling: a vision and roadmap for the future. Environmental Modelling & Software 2013, 39:3-23.
37. Lattuca L.R. Creating Interdisciplinarity: Interdisciplinary Research and Teaching Among College and University Faculty 2001, Vanderbilt University Press, Nashville, TN.
38. Liu J., Dietz T., Carpenter S.R., Alberti M., Folke C., Moran E., Pell A.N., Deadman P., Kratz T., Lubchenco J., Ostrom E., Ouyang Z., Provencher W., Redman C.L., Schneider S.H., Taylor W.W. Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science 2007, 317:1513-1516.
39. Mace G.M., Masundire H., Baillie J. Biodiversity. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being. A Report of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, Health Synthesis 2005, 77-116. Island Press, Washington, DC. C. Corvalan, S. Hales, A. McMichael (Eds.).
40. Mâsse L.C., Moser R.P., Stokols D., Taylor B.K., Marcus S.E., Morgan G.D., Hall K.L., Croyle R.T., Trochim W.M. Measuring collaboration and transdisciplinary integration in team science. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2008, 35:S151-S160.
41. Metzger N., Zare R.N. Interdisciplinary research: from belief to reality. Science 1999, 283:642-643.
42. Morillo F., Bordons María, Gómez I. Interdisciplinarity in science: a tentative typology of disciplines and research areas. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 2003, 54:1237-1249.
43. Nahlik A.M., Kentula M.E., Fennessy M.S., Landers D.H. Where is the consensus? A proposed foundation for moving ecosystem service concepts into practice. Ecological Economics 2012, 77:27-35.
44. Nowotny H., Scott P., Gibbons M. Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty 2001, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, UK.
45. Nutley S.M., Walter I., Davies H.T.O. Using Evidence: How Research Can Inform Public Services 2007, The Policy Press, Bristol, UK.
46. Öberg G. Facilitating interdisciplinary work: using quality assessment to create common ground. Higher Education 2009, 57:405-415.
47. Office of National Statistics, 2012. Accounting for the Value of Nature in the UK: A Call for Views by the Office of National Statistics.
48. Oh H., Chung M.-H., Labianca G. Group social capital and group effectiveness: the role of informal socializing ties. Academy of Management Journal 2004, 47:860-875.
49. Orne, M.T., 2009. Demand characteristics and the concept of quasi-controls. In: Rosenthal, R., Rosnow, R.L. (Eds.), Artifacts in Behavioral Research: Robert Rosenthal and Ralph L. Rosnow's Classic Books. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 110-137.
50. Pennington D. Cross-disciplinary collaboration and learning. Ecology and Society 2008, 13:8.
51. Pohl C. Transdisciplinary collaboration in environmental research. Futures 2005, 37:1159-1178.
52. Pohl C. From science to policy through transdisciplinary research. Environmental Science & Policy 2008, 11:46-53.
53. Porter A., Chubin D. An indicator of cross-disciplinary research. Scientometrics 1985, 8:161-176.
54. Porter A., Cohen A., Roessner J.D., Perreault M. Measuring researcher interdisciplinarity. Scientometrics 2007, 72:117-147.
55. Porter A., Rafols I. Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Measuring and mapping six research fields over time. Scientometrics 2009, 81:719-745.
56. Rafols I., Meyer M. How cross-disciplinary is bionanotechnology? Explorations in the specialty of molecular motors. Scientometrics 2007, 70:633-650.
57. Ramadier T. Transdisciplinarity and its challenges: the case of urban studies. Futures 2004, 36:423-439.
58. Rayner S., Malone E.L. Human Choice and Climate Change: An International Assessment 1998, Battelle Press, Columbus, OH.
59. Reid W.V., Chen D., Goldfarb L., Hackmann H., Lee Y.T., Mokhele K., Ostrom E., Raivio K., Rockström J., Schellnhuber H.J. Earth system science for global sustainability: grand challenges. Science 2010, 330:916-917.
60. Rigby J., Edler J. Peering inside research networks: some observations on the effect of the intensity of collaboration on the variability of research quality. Research Policy 2005, 34:784-794.
61. Rosenfield P.L. The potential of transdisciplinary research for sustaining and extending linkages between the health and social sciences. Social Science & Medicine 1992, 35:1343-1357.
62. Rotmans J., Dowlatabadi H. Integrated Assessment of Climate Change: Evaluation of Methods and Strategies. Climate Change 1995: Economic and Social Dimensions of Climate Change: Contribution of Working Group III to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 1996, 367-397. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. J.P. Bruce, H. Yi, E.F. Haites (Eds.).
63. Sanz-Menéndez L., Bordons M., Zulueta M.A. Interdisciplinarity as a multidimensional concept: its measure in three different research areas. Reservoir Evaluation 2001, 10:47-58.
64. Scheffer M., Brock W., Westley F. Socioeconomic mechanisms preventing optimum use of ecosystem services: an interdisciplinary theoretical analysis. Ecosystems 2000, 3:451-471.
65. Stock P., Burton R.J.F. Defining terms for integrated (multi-inter-trans-disciplinary) sustainability research. Sustainability 2011, 3:1090-1113.
66. Stokols D., Fuqua J., Gress J., Harvey R., Phillips K., Baezconde-Garbanati L., Unger J., Palmer P., Clark M.A., Colby S.M., Morgan G., Trochim W. Evaluating transdisciplinary science. Nicotine & Tobacco Research 2003, 5:S21-S39.
67. Stokols D., Hall K.L., Taylor B.K., Moser R.P. The science of team science: overview of the field and introduction to the supplement. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2008, 35:S77-S89.
68. Tol R.S.J., Vellinga P. The European Forum on integrated environmental assessment. Environmental Modeling & Assessment 1998, 3:181-191.
69. Toth F.L., Hizsnyik E. Integrated environmental assessment methods: evolution and applications. Environmental Modeling & Assessment 1998, 3:193-207.
70. Treasury H.M. Accounting for Environmental Impacts: Supplementary Green Book Guidance 2012, H. M. Treasury, London, UK.
71. Trochim W.M., Marcus S.E., Mâsse L.C., Moser R.P., Weld P.C. The evaluation of large research initiatives a participatory integrative mixed-methods approach. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2008, 29:8-28.
72. UK National Ecosystem Assessment, 2011. The UK National Ecosystem Assessment Technical Report (Technical Report: Introduction to the UK National Ecosystem Assessment), UK National Ecosystem Assessment. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, UK.
73. UK National Ecosystem Assessment, 2012. UK National Ecosystem Assessment Follow-On Phase [WWW Document]. UK National Ecosystem Assessment. URL (accessed 12.7.12). http://uknea.unep-wcmc.org/NEWFollowonPhase/tabid/123/Default.aspx.
74. Van Raan A.F.J. The interdisciplinary nature of science: theoretical framework and bibliometric-empirical approach. Practising Interdisciplinarity 2000, 66-78. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, Canada. N. Stehr, P. Weingart (Eds.).
75. Wagner C.S., Roessner J.D., Bobb K., Klein J.T., Boyack K.W., Keyton J., Rafols I., Börner K. Approaches to understanding and measuring interdisciplinary scientific research (IDR): a review of the literature. Journal of Informetrics 2011, 5:14-26.
76. Weiss C.H. The many meanings of research utilization. Public Administration Review 1979, 39:426-431.
77. Young, O.R., Underdal, A., 1997. Institutional Dimensions of Global Environmental Change. International Human Dimensions Programme on Global Environmental Change, Bonn, Germany.
78. Zitt M. Facing diversity of science: a challenge for bibliometric indicators. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research & Perspective 2005, 3:38-49.