Renal centre characteristics and physician practice patterns associated with home dialysis use

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation

Volumn 28, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 2169-2180

  Castledine, Clare I ^a   Gilg, Julie A ^a   Rogers, Chris ^b   Ben Shlomo, Yoav ^b   Caskey, Fergus J ^a,b  

^a SOUTHMEAD HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Home dialysis; Practice patterns; Uptake; Variation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIABETIC NEPHROPATHY; ETHNICITY; FEMALE; GLOMERULONEPHRITIS; HEALTH CARE ACCESS; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; HOME DIALYSIS; HUMAN; INDEPENDENCE; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT EDUCATION; PERITONEAL DIALYSIS; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; SOCIAL STATUS; UNITED KINGDOM; VIDEORECORDING;

HOME DIALYSIS; PRACTICE PATTERNS; UPTAKE; VARIATION;

AGED; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEMODIALYSIS UNITS, HOSPITAL; HEMODIALYSIS, HOME; HUMANS; KIDNEY FAILURE, CHRONIC; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; PROGNOSIS;

EID: 84884549420     PISSN: 09310509     EISSN: 14602385     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gft196     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Steenkamp R, Castledine C, Feest T et al. UK Renal Registry 13th Annual Report (December 2010): chapter 2: UK RRT prevalence in 2009: national and centre-specific analyses. Nephron Clin Pract 2011; 119: c27-c52
2. US Renal Data System, USRDS 2011 Annual Data Report: atlas of chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease in the United States: chapter 15 International comparisons. AJKD 2012; 60: 887-1056
3. van de Luijtgaarden MWM, Noordzij M, Wanner C et al. Renal replacement therapy in Europe-a summary of the 2009 ERAEDTA Registry Annual Report. Clin Kidney J 2012; 5: 109-119
4. Stel VS, van de Luijtgaarden MW, Wanner C et al. The 2008 ERA-EDTA Registry Annual Report-a precis. NDT Plus 2011; 4: 1-13
5. Stel VS, Kramer A, Zoccali C et al. The 2006 ERA-EDTA Registry annual report: a precis. J Nephrol 2009; 22: 1-12
6. Little J, Irwin A, Marshall T et al. Predicting a patient's choice of dialysis modality: experience in a United Kingdom renal department. Am J Kidney Dis 2001; 37: 981-986
7. Jager KJ, Korevaar JC, Dekker FW et al. The effect of contraindications and patient preference on dialysis modality selection in ESRD patients in The Netherlands. Am J Kidney Dis 2004; 43: 891-900
8. Wuerth DB, Finkelstein SH, Schwetz O et al. Patients' descriptions of specific factors leading to modality selection of chronic peritoneal dialysis or haemodialysis. Perit Dial Int 2002; 22: 184-190
9. Morton RL, Snelling P, Webster AC et al. Dialysis modality preference of patients with CKD and family caregivers: a discretechoice study. Am J Kidney Dis 2012; 60: 102-111
10. Castledine C, Gilg J, Rogers C et al. Chapter 15: RRT incidence and use of home dialysis modalities. Nephron Clin Pract 2011; 119: c255-c267
11. Couchoud C, Savoye E, Frimat L et al. Variability in case mix and peritoneal dialysis selection in fifty-nine French districts. Perit Dial Int 2008; 28: 509-517
12. Department of Health. Update on best practice tariffs 2011. http://www.dh.gov.uk/health/2011/12/bpt-update/
13. Ansell D, Tomson CR. UK Renal Registry Annual Report (December 2008): chapter 15: The UK Renal Registry, UKRR database, validation and methodology. Nephron Clin Pract 2009; 111: c269-c276
14. Bouvier N, Durand P-Y, Testa A et al. Regional discrepancies in peritoneal dialysis utilization in France: the role of the nephrologist's opinion about peritoneal dialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2009; 24: 1293-1297
15. Mattern WD, McGaghie WC, Rigby RJ et al. Selection of ESRD treatment: an international study. Am J Kidney Dis 1989; 13: 457-464
16. Goovaerts T, Jadoul M, Goffin E. Influence of a pre-dialysis education programme (PDEP) on the mode of renal replacement therapy. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2005; 20: 1842-1847
17. David CM, Scott RM, Beverley J et al. What do American nephrologists think about dialysis modality selection? Am J Kidney Dis 2001; 37: 22-29
18. Chassin MR. Explaining geographic variations. The enthusiasm hypothesis. Med Care 1993; 31: YS37-YS44
19. Zhao L. Attitudes of Chinese chief nephrologists toward dialysis modality selection. Adv Perit Dial 2003; 19: 155-158
20. Durand-Zaleski I, Combe C, Lang P. International Study of Health Care Organization and Financing for end-stage renal disease in France. Int J Health Care Finance Econ 2007; 7: 171-183
21. Mehrotra R, Blake P, Berman N et al. An analysis of dialysis training in the United States and Canada. Am J Kidney Dis 2002; 40: 152-160
22. Jassal SV, Krishna G, Mallick NP et al. Attitudes of British Isles nephrologists towards dialysis modality selection: a questionnaire study. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2002; 17: 474-477
23. Lobbedez T, Lecouf A, Ficheux M et al. Is rapid initiation of peritoneal dialysis feasible in unplanned dialysis patients? A single-centre experience. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2008; 23: 3290-3294
24. Ghaffari A. Urgent-start peritoneal dialysis: a quality improvement report. Am J Kidney Dis 2012; 59: 400-408
25. Povlsen JV, Ivarsen P. How to start the late referred ESRD patient urgently on chronic APD. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2006; 21: ii56-ii59
26. Morton RL, Howard K, Webster AC et al. Patient information about options for treatment (PINOT): a prospective national study of information given to incident CKD stage 5 patients. Nephrol Dial Transplantation 2011; 26: 1266-1274
27. McLaughlin K, Manns B, Mortis G et al. Why patients with ESRD do not select self-care dialysis as a treatment option. Am J Kidney Dis 2003; 41: 380-385
28. Harwood L, Clark AM. Understanding health decisions using critical realism: home-dialysis decision-making during chronic kidney disease. Nurs Inq 2012; 19: 29-38
29. Chanouzas D, Ng KP, Fallouh B et al. What influences patients' modality at the pre-dialysis stage? Nephrol Dial Transplant 2012; 27: 1542-1547
30. Asif A, Pflederer TA, Vieira CF et al. Does catheter insertion by nephrologists improve peritoneal dialysis utilization? A multicenter analysis. Semin Dial 2005; 18: 157-160
31. Buck J, Baker R, Cannaby AM et al. Why do patients known to renal services still undergo urgent dialysis initiation? A cross-sectional study. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2007; 22: 3240-3245
32. Ludlow MJ, George CRP, Hawley CM et al. How Australian nephrologists view home dialysis: results of a national survey. Nephrology 2011; 16: 446-452
33. van de Luijtgaarden MW, Noordzij M, Stel VS et al. Effects of comorbid and demographic factors on dialysis modality choice and related survival in Europe. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2011; 26: 2940
34. Trehan A, Winterbottom J, Lane B et al. End-stage renal disease in Indo-Asians in the North-West of England. QJM 2003; 96: 499-504
35. Barker-Cummings C, McClellan W, Soucie JM et al. Ethnic differences in the use of peritoneal dialysis as initial treatment for end stage renal disease. JAMA 1995; 274: 1858-1862
36. Gadegbeku C, Freeman M, Agodoa L. Racial disparities in renal replacement therapy. J Natl Med Assoc 2002; 94: 45S-54S
37. Winkelmayer WC, Glynn RJ, Levin R et al. Late referral and modality choice in end-stage renal disease. Kidney Int 2001; 60: 1547-1554
38. Stack AG. Impact of timing of nephrology referral and pre-ESRD care on mortality risk among new ESRD patients in the United States. Am J Kidney Dis 2003; 41: 310-318
39. Caskey FJ, Roderick P, Steenkamp R et al. Social deprivation and survival on renal replacement therapy in England and Wales. Kidney Int 2006; 70: 2134-2140
40. Nitsch D, Steenkamp R, Tomson CRV et al. Outcomes in patients on home haemodialysis in England and Wales, 1997-2005: a comparative cohort analysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2011; 26: 1670-1677
41. Phibbs CS, Luft HS. Correlation of travel time on roads versus straight line distance. Med Care Res Rev 1995; 52: 532-542
42. Jordan H, Roderick P, Martin D et al. Distance, rurality and the need for care: access to health services in South West England. Int J Health Geogr 2004; 3: 21