Dialysis modality preference of patients with CKD and family caregivers: A discrete-choice study

American Journal of Kidney Diseases

Volumn 60, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 102-111

  Morton, Rachael L ^a   Snelling, Paul ^b   Webster, Angela C ^a   Rose, John ^c   Masterson, Rosemary ^d   Johnson, David W ^e   Howard, Kirsten ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b ROYAL PRINCE ALFRED HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^d MELBOURNE HEALTH   (Australia)

^e UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

chronic kidney disease; conservative management; discrete choice experiment; health economics; Home dialysis; in center dialysis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CAREGIVER; CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIALYSIS; DISEASE SEVERITY; FAMILY; FEMALE; GLOMERULUS FILTRATION RATE; HOME CARE; HOME DIALYSIS; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HUMAN; LIFE EXPECTANCY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PERITONEAL DIALYSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDY;

AGED; CAREGIVERS; FEMALE; HUMANS; KIDNEY FAILURE, CHRONIC; LIFE STYLE; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERITONEAL DIALYSIS; RENAL DIALYSIS; RENAL INSUFFICIENCY, CHRONIC; TRAVEL;

EID: 84862777078     PISSN: 02726386     EISSN: 15236838     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2011.12.030     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Association Registry. 33rd Annual Report. Appendix I. ANZDATA Registry 2010 Report. http://www.anzdata.org.au/v1/report-2010.html. Accessed July 6, 2011.
2. Andrade MV, Junoy JP, Andrade EIG, et al. Allocation of initial modality for renal replacement therapy in Brazil. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;5(4):637-644.
3. Deber RB, Blidner IN, Carr LM, Barnsley JM. The impact of selected patient characteristics on practitioners' treatment recommendations for end-stage renal disease. Med Care. 1985;23(2):95-109.
4. Mendelssohn DC, Mujais SK, Soroka SD, et al. A prospective evaluation of renal replacement therapy modality eligibility. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2009;24(2):555-561.
5. Morton RL, Tong A, Howard K, Snelling P,Webster AC. The views of patients and carers in treatment decision making for chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. BMJ. 2010;340(c112):350.
6. National Kidney Foundation. K-DOQI Clinical Practice Guidelines for Hemodialysis Adequacy. Guideline 1. Initiation of dialysis. 1.1 Preparation for kidney failure. 2006. http://www.kidney.org/Professionals/kdoqi/guideline-upHD- PD-VA/index.htm. Accessed July 6, 2011.
7. Renal Physicians Association. Shared Decision Making in the Appropriate Initiation of and Withdrawal from Dialysis. Clinical Practice Guideline. 2nd ed. Rockville, MD: Renal Physicians Association; 2010.
8. Fenton SS, Schaubel DE, Desmeules M, et al. Hemodialysis versus peritoneal dialysis: a comparison of adjusted mortality rates. Am J Kidney Dis. 1997;30(3):334-342.
9. Wu AW, Fink NE, Marsh-Manzi JVR, et al. Changes in quality of life during hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis treatment: generic and disease specific measures. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004;15(3):743-753.
10. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Guidance on Home Compared With Hospital Haemodialysis for Patients With End-Stage Renal Failure. NICE Technology Appraisal Guidance-No. 48. London, UK: National Health Service; 2002.
11. Government Accountability Office. GAO-09-537. End Stage Renal Disease. CMS Should Monitor Effect of Bundled Paymenton Home Dialysis Utilization Rates. Washington, DC: United States Government; 2009.
12. NSW Department of Health. NSW Renal Dialysis Service Plan to 2011. Service Planning Series:1-50. 2007. http://www.health.nsw.gov.au/resources/gmct/ renal/pdf/nswrenalplan-jan2007-final.pdf. Accessed February 24, 2011.
13. Morton RL, Tong A, Webster AC, Snelling P, Howard K. Characteristics of dialysis important to patients and family caregivers: a mixed methods approach. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011;26(12):4038-4046.
14. Hall JP, Kenny P, Hossain I. The Provision of Informal Care in Terminal Illness: An Analysis of Carers' Needs Using a Discrete Choice Experiment. CHERE working paper 2007/12. Sydney, Australia: Centre for Health Economics Research Evaluation (CHERE); 2007.
15. Lancaster K. A new approach to consumer therory. J Polit Econ. 1966;74:134-157.
16. McFadden D. Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behaviour. New York, NY: Academic Press; 1974.
17. Bryan S, Gold L, Sheldon R, Buxton M. Preference measurement using conjoint methods: an empirical investigation of reliability. Health Econ. 2000;9(5):385-395.
18. Davison SN, Kromm SK, Currie GR. Patient and health professional preferences for organ allocation and procurement, end-of-life care and organization of care for patients with chronic kidney disease using a discrete choice experiment. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010;25(7):2334-2341.
19. Bridges JFP, Brett Hauber A, Marshall D, et al. Conjoint analysis applications in health - a checklist: a report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force. Value Health. 2011;14(4):403-413.
20. Morton RL, Snelling P,Webster AC, et al. Factors influencing patient choice of dialysis versus conservative care for treatment of end-stage kidney disease [published online ahead of print February 6, 2012]. CMAJ. doi:10.1503/cmaj.111355.
21. Hensher DA, Rose JM, Greene WH. Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2005.
22. Morton RL, Devitt J, Howard K, Anderson K, Snelling P, Cass A. Patient views about treatment of stage 5 CKD: a qualitative analysis of semistructured interviews. Am J Kidney Dis. 2010;55(3):431-440.
23. Ansell D, Roderick P, Steenkamp R, Tomson CRV. Survival and causes of death of UK adult patients on renal replacement therapy in 2008: national and centre-specific analyses. In: UK Renal Registry 12th Annual Report. Bristol, UK: Renal Association; 2010:117-144.
24. Byrne C, Ford D, Gilg J, Ansell D, Feehally J. UK ESRD incident rates in 2008: national and centre-specific analyses. Nephron Clin Pract. 2010;115(Suppl 1):c9-c40.
25. Polkinghorne K, Livingston B, Dent H, Excell L, McDonald S. Haemodialysis. In: ANZDATA Registry 2010 Report. Sydney, Australia: ANZDATARegistry; 2010:1-35.
26. US Renal Data System. USRDS 2010 Annual Data Report: Atlas of Chronic Kidney Disease and End-Stage Renal Disease in the United States. Am J Kidney Dis. 2011;57(1)(suppl 1):e1-e526
27. Chadna SM, Da Silva-Gane M, Marshall C, Warwicker P, Greenwood RN, Farrington K. Survival of elderly patients with stage 5 CKD: comparison of conservative management and renal replacement therapy. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011;26(5):1608-1614.
28. Ellam T, El-Kossi M, Prasanth KC, El-hanas M, Khwaja A. Conservatively managed patients with stage 5 chronic kidney disease - outcomes from a single center experience. QJM. 2009;102(8):547-554.
29. Bliemer MCJ, Rose JM. Construction of experimental designs for mixed logit models allowing for correlation across choice observations. Transportation Res B. 2010;46(3):720-734.
30. Australian Bureau of Statistics. 6523.0-Household Income and Income Distribution, Australia, 2005-06.Appendix 3. Equivalised disposable household income. Canberra: Australian Government. http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@. nsf/Previousproducts/6523.0Appendix32005-06?opendocument&tabname= Notes&prodno=6523.0&issue=2005-06&num=&view=; 2007. Accessed February 24, 2011.
31. Grace B, Excell L, McDonald S. Stock and flow. In: ANZDATA Registry 2010 Annual Report. Vol 33. Sydney, Australia: Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Association; 2010:1.
32. Pipkin M, Eggers PW, Larive B, et al. Recruitment and training for home hemodialysis: experience and lessons from the Nocturnal Dialysis Trial. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;5(9):1614-1620.
33. Caplin B, Kumar S, Davenport A. Patients' perspective of haemodialysis-associated symptoms. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfq763.
34. Rocco MV, Lockridge RS, Beck GJ, et al. The effects of frequent nocturnal home hemodialysis: the Frequent Hemodialysis Network Nocturnal Trial. Kidney Int. 2011;80(10):1080-1091.
35. McFarlane PA, Pierratos A, Bayoumi AB, Redelmeier DA. Estimating preference scores in conventional and home nocturnal hemodialysis patients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007;2(3):477-483.
36. Kidney Health Australia. Consumer perspectives on dialysis: first national census. Melbourne. 2011. www.kidney.org.au. Accessed July 22, 2011.
37. US Department of Health and Human Services. Medicare Coverage of Kidney Dialysis and Kidney Transplant Services. Baltimore, MD: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services; 2011.
38. BBC News online. Burnham stresses need for more NHS care at home February 2010. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk-news/politics/8521117.stm. Accessed April 22, 2010.
39. Howard K, Salkeld G, White S, et al. The cost-effectiveness of increasing kidney transplantation and home-based dialysis. Nephrology. 2009;14(1):123-132.
40. Gomez CG, Valido P, Celadilla O, Bernaldo de Quiros AG, Mojon M. Validity of a standard information protocol provided to end-stage renal disease patients and its effect on treatment selection. Perit Dial Int. 1999;19(5):471-477.
41. Little J, Irwin A, Marshall T, Rayner H, Smith S. Predicting a patient's choice of dialysis modality: experience in a United Kingdom renal department. Am J Kidney Dis. 2001;37(5):981-986.
42. Ahmed S, Addicott C, Qureshi M, Pendleton N, Clague JE, Horan MA. Opinions of elderly people on treatment for end-stage renal disease. Gerontology. 1999;45(3):156-159.
43. Hines SC, Glover JJ, Babrow AS, Holley JL, Badzek LA, Moss AH. Improving advance care planning by accommodating family preferences. J Palliat Med. 2001;4(4):481-489.
44. Pruchno RA, Lemay EP Jr, Feild L, Levinsky NG. Predictors of patient treatment preferences and spouse substituted judgments: the case of dialysis continuation. Med Decis Making. 2006;26(2):112-121.
45. Walker DR, Inglese GW, Sloand JA, Just PM. Dialysis facility and patient characteristics associated with utilization of home dialysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;5(9):1649-1654.