Asking Sensitive Questions: An Evaluation of the Randomized Response Technique Versus Direct Questioning Using Individual Validation Data

Sociological Methods and Research

Volumn 42, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 321-353

  Wolter, Felix ^a   Preisendörfer, Peter ^a  

^a JOHANNES GUTENBERG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

randomized response technique; response bias; sensitive questions; social desirability; survey methodology; validation study

Indexed keywords

EID: 84884544334     PISSN: 00491241     EISSN: 15528294     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0049124113500474     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Aquilino William S.,Wright Debra L.,Supple Andrew J.Response Effects Due to Bystander Presence in CASI and Paper-and-Pencil Surveys of Drug Use and Alcohol Use.Substance Use & Misuse. 2000;35:845-67.
2. Beldt Sandra F.,Daniel Wayne W.,Garcha Bikramjit S.The Takahasi-Sakasegawa Randomized Response Technique: A Field Test.Sociological Methods & Research. 1982;11:101-11.
3. Bernstein Robert,Chadha Anita,Montjoy Robert.Overreporting Voting. Why it Happens and Why it Matters.Public Opinion Quarterly. 2001;65:22-44.
4. Blank Sara G.Using the Randomized Response Technique to Investigate Illegal Fishing and Contribute to Abalone Management in Northern California. Wellington, New Zealand: Victoria University of Wellington; 2008:.
5. Boruch Robert F.Assuring Confidentiality of Responses in Social Research: A Note on Strategies.American Sociologist. 1971;6:308-11.
6. Bradburn Norman M.,Sudman SeymourImproving Interview Method and Questionnaire Design. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1979:.
7. Polizeiliche Kriminalstatistik 2009 Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Wiesbaden, Germany: Bundeskriminalamt; 2009:.
8. BurrisJane E.JohnsonTimothy P.O'RourkeDiane P. 2003. Validating Self-reports of Socially Desirable Behaviors. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Sheraton Music City, Nashville, TN. Retrieved 2013-08-05, fromwww.amstat.org. American Association for Public Opinion Research-Section on Survey Research Methods.
9. Coutts Elisabeth,Jann Ben.Sensitive Questions in Online Surveys: Experimental Results for the Randomized Response Technique (RRT) and the Unmatched Count Technique (UCT).Sociological Methods & Research. 2011;40:169-93.
10. Crowne Douglas P.,Marlowe David.A New Scale of Social Desirability Independent of Psychopathology.Journal of Consulting Psychology. 1960;24:349-54.
11. Diekmann Andreas,Jann Ben.Anreizformen und Ausschöpfungsquoten bei postalischen Befragungen. Eine Prüfung der Reziprozitätshypothese.ZUMA-Nachrichten. 2001;48:18-27.
12. de Jong,Martijn G,Pieters Rik,Fox Jean-Paul.Reducing Social Desirability Bias Through Item Randomized Response: An Application to Measure Underreported Desires.Journal of Marketing Research. 2010;47:14-27.
13. Edgell Stephen E.,Himmelfarb Samuel,Duchan Karen L.Validity of Forced Responses in a Randomized Response Model.Sociological Methods & Research. 1982;11:89-100.
14. Esser Hartmut.Können Befragte lügen? Zum Konzept des 'wahren Wertes im Rahmen der handlungstheoretischen Erklärung von Situationseinflüssen bei der Befragung.Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie. 1986;38:314-36.
15. Esser HartmutPerson-Situation-Institution-Kultur. Wittenberg R., ed. Berlin, Germany: Duncker & Humblot; 1991:59-78.
16. Folsom Ralph E.A Randomized Response Validation Study: Comparison of Direct and Randomized Reporting of DUI Arrests. Chapel Hill, NC: Research Triangle Institute; 1974:.
17. Folsom Ralph E.,Greenberg Bernard G.,Horvitz Daniel G.,Abernathy James R.The Two Alternate Questions Randomized Response Model for Human Surveys.Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1973;68:525-30.
18. Fox James Alan,Tracy Paul E.Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1986:.
19. Ganster Daniel C.,Hennessey Harry W.,Luthans Fred.Social Desirability Response Effects: Three Alternative Models.Academy of Management Journal. 1983;26:321-31.
20. Greenberg Bernard G.,Kuebler Roy R.,Abernathy James R.,Horvitz Daniel G.Application of the Randomized Response Technique in Obtaining Quantitative Data.Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1971;66:243-50.
21. Groves Robert M.,Fowler Floyd J.,Couper Mick P.,Lepkowski James M.,Singer Eleanor,Tourangeau RogerSurvey Methodology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley; 2004:.
22. Holbrook Allyson L.,Krosnick Jon A.Measuring Voter Turnout by Using the Randomized Response Technique. Evidence Calling into Question the Method's Validity.Public Opinion Quarterly. 2010;74:328-43.
23. Horvitz Daniel G.,Shah B. V.,Simmons Walt R.The Unrelated Question Randomized Response Model.Proceedings of the American Statistical Association (Social Statistics Section). 1967;:65-72.
24. Hox Joop J.,Leeuw Edith D. deSurvey Nonresponse. Groves R. M.Dillman D. A.Eltinge J. L.Little R. J. A., ed. New York: John Wiley; 2002:103-20.
25. Hyman Herbert.Do They Tell the Truth?.Public Opinion Quarterly. 1944;8:557-59.
26. Jann BenRRLOGIT: Stata Module to Estimate Logistic Regression for Randomized Response Data. Boston, MA: Boston College Department of Economics; 2005:.
27. Jann BenRRREG: Stata Module to Estimate Linear Probability Model for Randomized Response Data. Boston, MA: Boston College Department of Economics; 2008:.
28. Johnson Timothy P.,Fendrich Michael,Mackesy-Amiti Mary-Ellen.An Evalutation of the Validity of the Crowne-Marlowe Need for Approval Scale.Quality & Quantity. 2012;46:1883-96.
29. Jones Elise F.,Forrest Jacqueline D.Underreporting of Abortion in Surveys of U.S. Women: 1976 to 1988.Demography. 1992;29:113-26.
30. King Maryon F.,Bruner Gordon C.Social Desirability Bias: A Neglected Aspect of Validity Testing.Psychology & Marketing. 2000;17:79-103.
31. Kreuter Frauke,Presser Stanley,Tourangeau Roger.Social Desirability Bias in CATI, IVR, and Web Surveys. The Effects of Mode and Question Sensitivity.Public Opinion Quarterly. 2008;72:847-65.
32. Krumpal IvarSensitive Questions and Measurement Error: Using the Randomized Response Technique to Reduce Social Desirability Bias in CATI Surveys. Leipzig, Germany: Universität Leipzig; 2009:.
33. Kuk Anthony Y. C.Asking Sensitive Questions Indirectly.Biometrika. 1990;77:436-38.
34. Kulka Richard A.,Weeks Michael F.,Folsom Robert E.Working Paper. Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute; 1981:.
35. Lamb Charles W.,Stem Donald E.An Empirical Validation of the Randomized Response Technique.Journal of Marketing Research. 1978;15:616-21.
36. Landsheer Johannes A.,Heijden Peter van der,Gils Ger van.Trust and Understanding. Two Psychological Aspects of Randomized Response.Quality & Quantity. 1999;33:1-12.
37. Lara Diana,Strickler Jennifer,Olavarrieta Claudia Díaz,Ellertson Charlotte.Measuring Induced Abortion in Mexico. A Comparison of Four Methodologies.Sociological Methods & Research. 2004;32:529-58.
38. Lensvelt-Mulders Gerty J. L. M.,Boeije Hennie R.Evaluating Compliance with a Computer Assisted Randomized Response Technique: A Qualitative Study into the Origins of Lying and Cheating.Computers in Human Behavior. 2007;23:591-608.
39. Lensvelt-Mulders Gerty J. L. M.,Hox Joop J.,Peter G. M., How to Improve the Efficiency of Randomised Response Designs.Quality & Quantity. 2005;39:253-65.
40. Lensvelt-Mulders Gerty J. L. M.,Hox Joop J.,Peter G. M.,Maas Cora J. M.Meta-analysis of Randomized Response Research. Thirty-five Years of Validation.Sociological Methods & Research. 2005;33:319-48.
41. Liu P. T.,Chow L. P.The Efficiency of the Multiple Trial Randomized Response Technique.Biometrics. 1976a;32:607-18.
42. Liu P. T.,Chow L. P.A New Discrete Quantitative Randomized Response Model.Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1976b;71:30-31.
43. Locander William,Sudman Seymour,Bradburn Norman.An Investigation of Interview Method, Threat and Response Distortion.Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1976;71:269-75.
44. Maddala G. S.Limited-dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 1983:.
45. McCrae Robert R.,Costa Paul T.Social Desirability Scales: More Substance Than Style.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1983;51:882-88.
46. Moorman Robert H.,Podsakoff Philip M.A Meta-analytic Review and Empirical Test of the Potential Confounding Effects of Social Desirability Response Sets in Organizational Behaviour Research.Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. 1992;65:131-49.
47. Moors J. J. A.Optimization of the Unrelated Question Randomized Response Model.Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1971;66:627-29.
48. Nordlund Sturla,Holme Ingar,Tamsfoss Steinar.Randomized Response Estimates for the Purchase of Smuggled Liquor in Norway.Addiction. 1994;89:401-05.
49. Ostapczuk Martin,Musch Jochen,Moshagen Morten.A Randomized-response Investigation of the Education Effect in Attitudes Towards Foreigners.European Journal of Social Psychology. 2009;39:920-31.
50. Paulhus Delroy L.,Reid Douglas B.Enhancement and Denial in Socially Desirable Responding.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1991;60:307-17.
51. Phillips Derek L.,Clancy Kevin J.Some Effects of 'Social Desirability' in Survey Studies.American Journal of Sociology. 1972;77:921-40.
52. Rasinski Kenneth A.,Willis Gordon B.,Baldwin Alison K.,Yeh Wenchi,Lee Lisa.Methods of Data Collection, Perceptions of Risks and Losses, and Motivation to Give Truthful Answers to Sensitive Survey Questions.Applied Cognitive Psychology. 1999;13:465-84.
53. Reckers Philip M. J.,Wheeler Stephen W.,Wong-On-Wing Bernard.A Comparative Examination of Auditor Premature Sign-offs Using the Direct and the Randomized Response Methods.Auditing. 1997;16:69-78.
54. Reinmuth James E.,Geurts Michael D.The Collection of Sensitive Information Using a Two-stage, Randomized Response Model.Journal of Marketing Research. 1975;12:402-07.
55. Schnell Rainer,Kreuter Frauke.Separating Interviewer and Sampling-point Effects.Journal of Official Statistics. 2005;21:389-410.
56. Silver Brian D.,Abramson Paul R.,Anderson Barbara A.The Presence of Others and Overreporting of Voting in American National Elections.Public Opinion Quarterly. 1986;50:228-39.
57. Skarbek-Kozietulska Anna,Preisendörfer Peter,Wolter Felix.Leugnen oder gestehen? Bestimmungsfaktoren wahrer Antworten in Befragungen.Zeitschrift für Soziologie. 2012;41:5-23.
58. Stadtmüller Sven.Rücklauf gut, alles gut? Zu erwünschten und unerwünschten Effekten monetärer Anreize bei postalischen Befragungen.Methoden-Daten-Analysen. 2009;3:167-85.
59. Stocké Volker.Entstehungsbedingungen von Antwortverzerrungen durch soziale Erwünschtheit. Ein Vergleich der Rational-choice Theorie und des Modells der Frame-Selektion.Zeitschrift für Soziologie. 2004;33:303-20.
60. Stocké Volker.Deutsche Kurzskala zur Erfassung des Bedürfnisses nach sozialer Anerkennung.ZUMA-Informationssystem. Elektronisches Handbuch sozialwissenschaftlicher Erhebungsinstrumente ZIS Version 11.00. 2007a;:.
61. Stocké Volker.The Interdependence of Determinants for the Strength and Direction of Social Desirability Bias in Racial Attitude Surveys.Journal of Official Statistics. 2007b;23:493-514.
62. Tezcan Sabahat,Omran Abdel R.Prevalence and Reporting of Induced Abortion in Turkey: Two Survey Techniques.Studies in Family Planning. 1981;12:262-71.
63. Tourangeau Roger,Yan Ting.Sensitive Questions in Surveys.Psychological Bulletin. 2007;133:859-83.
64. Tracy Paul E.,Fox James Alan.The Validity of Randomized Response for Sensitive Measurements.American Sociological Review. 1981;46:187-200.
65. Umesh U. N.,Peterson Robert A.A Critical Evaluation of the Randomized Response Method. Applications, Validation, and Research Agenda.Sociological Methods & Research. 1991;20:104-38.
66. Peter G. M.,Gils Ger vanStatistical Modelling. Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Statistical Modelling. Forcina A.Marchetti G. M.Hatzinger R.Perugia G. Galmacci, ed. Rome: University of Perugia; 1996:341-48.
67. Peter G. M.,Gils Ger van,Bouts Jan,Hox Joop J.A Comparison of Randomized Response, Computer-assisted Self-interview, and Face-to-Face Direct Questioning. Eliciting Sensitive Information in the Context of Welfare and Unemployment Benefit.Sociological Methods & Research. 2000;28:505-37.
68. Warner Stanley L.Randomized Response: A Survey Technique for Eliminating Evasive Answer Bias.Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1965;60:63-69.
69. Wimbush James C.,Dalton Dan R.Base Rate for Employee Theft: Convergence of Multiple Methods.Journal of Applied Psychology. 1997;82:756-63.
70. Wolter FelixHeikle Fragen in Interviews. Eine Validierung der Randomized Response-Technik. Wiesbaden: Springer VS; 2012:.