Response effects due to bystander presence in CASI and paper-and-pencil surveys of drug use and alcohol use

Substance Use and Misuse

Volumn 35, Issue 6-8, 2000, Pages

  Aquilino, William S ^a   Wright, Debra L ^a   Supple, Andrew J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

CASI; Response effects; Self administered interviews; Survey measurement; Third party effects

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL; CANNABIS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION; ARTICLE; COMPUTER SYSTEM; DRUG USE; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MEASUREMENT; PARENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SELF EVALUATION; SIBLING; SPOUSE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0343569876     PISSN: 10826084     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/10826080009148424     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. AQUILINO, W. S. (1993). Effects of spouse presence during the interview on survey responses concerning marriage. Public Opin. Q. 57: 358-376.
2. AQUILINO, W. (1997). Privacy effects on self-reported drug use: Interactions with survey mode and respondent characteristics. In L. Harrison and A. Hughes (Eds.), The Validity of Self-Reported Drug Use: Improving the Accuracy of Survey Estimates (National Institute on Drug Abuse Monograph 167). Washington, DC: NIH, DHHS.
3. ANDERSON, B. A., and SILVER, B. (1987). The validity of survey responses: Insights from interviews of married couples in a survey of Soviet emigrants. Soc. Forces 66: 537-554.
4. BRADBURN, N. M., and SUDMAN, S. (1979). Improving Interview Method and Questionnaire Design: Response Effects to Threatening Questions in Survey Research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
5. CASTERLINE, J., and CHIDAMBARAM, V. C. (1984). The presence of others during the interview and the reporting of contraceptive knowledge and use. In J. A. Ross and R. McNamara (Eds.), Survey Analysis for the Guidance of Family Planning Programs (pp. 267-298). Liege, Belgium: Ordina Edisions.
6. GFROERER, J. (1985). Underreporting of drug use by youths resulting from lack of privacy in household interviews. In B. Rouse, N. Kozel and L. Richards (Eds.), Self-Report Methods of Estimating Drug Use: Meeting Current Challenges to Validity [National Institute on Drug Abuse Research Monograph 57, DHSS Publication (ADM) 85-1402] (pp. 22-30).
7. GOFFMAN, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, NY: Douhleday.
8. HARTMANN, P. (1995). Response behavior in interview settings of limited privacy. Int. J. Public Opin. Res. 7: 383-389.
9. METTS, S. (1997). Face and facework: Implications for the study of personal relationships. In S. Duck (Ed.), Handbook of Personal Relationships: Theory, Research, and Interventions, 2nd ed. (pp. 373-390). West Sussex, England: Wiley.
10. MITCHELL, R. (1965). Survey materials collected in the developing countries: Sampling, measurement, and interviewing obstacles to intra- and inter-national comparisons. Int. Soc. Sci. J. 17: 665-685.
11. POLLNER, M., and ADAMS, R. E. (1994). The interpersonal context of mental health interviews. J. Health Soc. Behav. 35: 283-290.
12. POLLNER, M., and ADAMS, R. E. (1997). The effect of spouse presence on appraisals of emotional support and household strain. Public Opin. Q. 61: 615-626.
13. REUBAND, K. (1992). On third persons in the interview situation and their impact on responses. Int. J. Public Opin. Res. 4: 269-274.
14. SILVER, B., ABRAMSON, P., and ANDERSON, B. (1986). The presence of others and overreporting of voting in American national elections. Public Opin. Q. 50: 228-239.
15. SMITH, T. (1997). The impact of the presence of others on a respondent's answers to questions. Int. J. Public Opin. Res. 9: 33-47.
16. SUPPLE, A., AQUILINO, W., and WRIGHT, D. (1998). Collecting Sensitive Self-Report Data with Laptop Computers: Impact on the Response Tendencies of Adolescents in a Home Interview. Unpublished manuscript.
17. TAIETZ, P. (1962). Conflicting group norms and the 'third' person in the interview. Am. J. Social. 68: 97-104.
18. TURNER, C. F., KU, L., ROGERS, S., LINDBERG, L., PLECK, J., and SONENSTEIN, F. (1998). Adolescent sexual behavior, drug use and violence: New survey technology detects elevated prevalence among U.S. males. Science 280: 867-873.
19. ZANES, A., and MATSOUKAS, E. (1979). Different settings, different results? A comparison of home and school response. Public Opin. Q. 43: 550-557.