Learning from multiple information sources

International Encyclopedia of Education

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 191-196

  Stromso H I ^a   Braten I ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

Information sources; Learning; Mental representations; Multiple information sources; Multiple texts; Reading; Reading comprehension; Reading instruction; Text comprehension; Web based sources

Indexed keywords

EID: 84884445085     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.00496-6     Document Type: Chapter

References (28)

1. Bloome D., Egan-Robertson A. The social construction of intertextuality in classroom reading and writing lessons. Reading Research Quarterly 1993, 28:305-333.
2. Britt M.A., Aglinskas C. Improving students' ability to identify and use source information. Cognition and Instruction 2002, 20:485-522.
3. Britt M.A., Gabrys G.L. Teaching advanced literacy skills for the World Wide Web. Learning and Teaching on the World Wide Web 2000, 73-90. Academic Press, San Diego, CA. C.R. Wolfe (Ed.).
4. Britt M.A., Perfetti C.A., Sandak R., Rouet J.-F. Content integration and source separation in learning from multiple texts. Narrative, Comprehension, Causality, and Coherence: Essays in Honor of Tom Trabasso 1999, 209-233. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. S.R. Goldman, A.C. Graesser, P. van den Broek (Eds.).
5. Britt M.A., Wiemer-Hastings P., Larson A.A., Perfetti C.A. Using intelligent feedback to improve sourcing and integration in students' essays. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 2004, 14:359-374.
6. Bråten I. Personal epistemology, understanding of multiple texts, and learning within Internet technologies. Knowing, Knowledge, and Beliefs: Epistemological Studies across Diverse Cultures 2008, 351-376. Springer, Amsterdam. M.S. Khine (Ed.).
7. Bråten I., Strømsø H.I. Effects of personal epistemology on the understanding of multiple texts. Reading Psychology 2006, 27:457-484.
8. Bråten I., Strømsø H.I. Constructing meaning from multiple information sources as a function of personal epistemology: The role of text-processing strategies. Information Design Journal 2006, 14:56-67.
9. Cerdan R., Vidal-Abarca E. The effects of tasks on integrating information from multiple documents. Journal of Educational Psychology 2008, 100:209-222.
10. DeStefano D., LeFevre J.A. Cognitive load in hypertext reading: A review. Computers in Human Behavior 2007, 23:1616-1641.
11. Goldman S.R., Bloome D.M. Learning to construct and integrate. Experimental Cognitive Psychology and Its Applications: Festschrift in Honor of Lyle Bourne, Walter Kintsch, and Thomas Landauer 2004, 169-182. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC. A.F. Healy (Ed.).
12. Jacobson M.J., Spiro R.J. Hypertext learning environments, cognitive flexibility, and the transfer of complex knowledge: An empirical investigation. Journal of Educational Computing Research 1995, 12:301-333.
13. Kim H.S., Kamil M.L. Electronic and multimedia documents. Rethinking Reading Comprehension 2003, 166-175. Guilford Press, New York. A.P. Sweet, C.E. Snow (Eds.).
14. Kintsch W. The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review 1988, 95:163-182.
15. Kurby C.A., Britt M.A., Magliano J.P. The role of top-down and bottom-up processes in between-text integration. Reading Psychology 2005, 26:335-362.
16. Mannes S. Strategic processing of text. Journal of Educational Psychology 1994, 86:577-588.
17. Perfetti C.A., Rouet J.-F., Britt M.A. Toward a theory of documents representation. The Construction of Mental Representations during Reading 1999, 99-122. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. H. van Oostendorp, S.R. Goldman (Eds.).
18. Rouet J.-F., Favart M., Britt M.A., Perfetti C.A. Studying and using multiple documents in history: Effects of discipline expertise. Cognition and Instruction 1997, 15:85-106.
19. Rukavina I., Daneman M. Integration and its effect on acquiring knowledge about competing scientific theories from text. Journal of Educational Psychology 1996, 88:272-287.
20. Uses of Intertextuality in Classroom and Educational Research 2004, Information Age Publishing, Greenwich, CT. N. Shuart-Faris, D. Bloome (Eds.).
21. Stahl S.A., Hynd C.R., Britton B.K., McNish M.M., Bosquet D. What happens when students read multiple source documents in history?. Reading Research Quarterly 1996, 31:430-456.
22. Strømsø H.I., Bråten I., Samuelstuen M.S. Students' strategic use of multiple sources during expository text reading: A longitudinal think-aloud study. Cognition and Instruction 2003, 21:113-147.
23. VanSledright B.A. Fifth graders investigating history in the classroom: Results from a researcher-practitioner design experiment. Elementary School Journal 2002, 103:131-160.
24. VanSledright B.A., Kelly C. Reading American history: The influence of multiple sources on six fifth graders. Elementary School Journal 1998, 98:239-265.
25. Wiley J., Voss J.F. Constructing arguments from multiple sources: Tasks that promote understanding and not just memory for text. Journal of Educational Psychology 1999, 91:301-311.
26. Wineburg S. Historical problem solving: A study of the cognitive processes used in the evaluation of documentary and pictorial evidence. Journal of Educational Psychology 1991, 83:73-87.
27. Goldman S.R. Cognitive aspects of constructing meaning through and across multiple texts. Uses of Intertextuality in Classroom and Educational Research 2004, 317-351. Information Age Publishing, Greenwich, CT. N. Shuart-Faris, D. Bloome (Eds.).
28. Rouet J.-F. The Skills of Document Use: From Text Comprehension to Web-Based Learning 2006, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.