The role of top-down and bottom-up processes in between-text integration

Reading Psychology

Volumn 26, Issue 4-5, 2005, Pages 335-362

  Kurby, Christopher A ^a   Britt, M Anne ^a   Magliano, Joseph P ^a  

^a NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 29344452214     PISSN: 02702711     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02702710500285870     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Albrecht, J. E., & Myers, J. L. (1995). Role of context in accessing distant information during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1459-1468.
2. Albrecht, J. E., & Myers, J. L. (1998). Accessing distant text information during reading: Effects of contextual cues. Discourse Processing, 26, 87-107.
3. Albrecht, J. E., & O'Brien, E. J. (1993). Updating a mental model: Maintaining both local and global coherence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1061-1070.
4. Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
5. Bovair, S., & Kieras, D. E. (1984). A guide to prepositional analysis for research on technical prose. In B. K. Britton & J. B. Black (Eds.), Understanding expository text (pp. 315-362). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6. Bransford, J. D., & Johnson, M. K. (1972). Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 717-726.
7. Britt, M. A., & Aglinskas, C. (2002). Improving students' ability to use source information. Cognition and Instruction, 20, 485-522.
8. Britt, M. A., Perfetti, C. A., Sandak, R., & Rouet, J.-F. (1999). Content integration and source separation in learning from multiple texts. In S. R. Goldman, A. C., Graesser, & P. van den Broek (Eds.), Narrative comprehension, causality, and coherence. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 209-233.
9. Britt, M. A., & Sommer, J. (2004). Facilitating textual integration with macro-structure focusing task. Reading Psychology, 25, 313-339.
10. Catrambone, R. (2002). The effects of surface and structural feature matches on the access of story analogs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 28, 318-334.
11. Dee-Lucas, D., & Larkin, J. H. (1995). Learning from electronic texts: Effects of interactive overviews for information access. Cognition & Instruction, 13, 431-468.
12. Dooling, D.J., & Lachman, R. (1971). Effects of comprehension on retention of prose. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 88, 216-222.
13. Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101, 371-395.
14. Kim, H.-J.J., & Millis, K. K. (in press). Integrating news stories: The co-Influence of sourcing and situational dimensions on the integration of news. Discourse Processes.
15. Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
16. Kintsch, W., & Franzke, M. (1995). The role of background knowledge in the recall of a news story. In R. F. Lorch & E. J. O'Brien (Eds.), Sources of coherence in reading (pp. 321-333). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
17. Klin, C. M. (1995). Causal inferences in reading: From immediate activation to long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1483-1494.
18. Long, D. L., & Lea, R. B. (2005). Have we been searching for meaning in all the wrong places? Defining the "search after meaning" principle in comprehension. Discourse Processes, 39, 279-298.
19. Magliano, J. P., Radvansky, G. A., & Copeland, D. E. (in press). Beyond language comprehension: Situation models as a form of autobiographical memory. In F. Schmalhofer & C. Perfetti (Eds.), Higher level language processes in the brain: Inference and comprehension processes. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
20. Magliano, J. P., & Schleich, M. C. (2000). Verb aspect and situation models. Discourse Processes, 29, 83-112.
21. Magliano, J. P., Zwaan, R. A., & Graesser, A. C. (1998). The role of situational continuity in narrative understanding. In S. R. Goldman & H. van Oostendorp (Eds.), The construction of mental representation during reading (pp. 219-245). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. Marsh, E. J., Meade, M. L., & Roediger, H. L. (2003). Learning facts from fiction. Journal of Memory & Language, 49, 519-536.
23. McKoon, G., Gerrig, R. J., & Greene, S. B. (1996). Pronoun resolution without pronouns: Some consequences of memory-based text processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 919-932.
24. Millis, K. K., & Erdman, B.J. (1998). Comprehending news articles: Updating the news. Poetics, 25, 343-361.
25. Myers, J. L., & O'Brien, E.J. (1998) .Accessing the discourse representation during reading. Discourse Processes, 26, 131-157.
26. Myers, J. L., Shinjo, M., & Duffy, S. A. (1987). Degree of causal relatedness and memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 453-465.
27. Ozyurek, A., & Trabasso, T. (1997). Evaluation during the understanding of narratives. Discourse Processes, 23, 305-335.
28. Perfetti, C. A., Britt, M. A., & Georgi, M. C. (1995). Text-based learning and reasoning: Studies in history. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. Radvansky, G. A., & Zacks, R. T. (1991). Mental models and the fan effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 940-953.
30. Ratcliff, R. (1978). A theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review, 85, 59-108.
31. Rich-Scott, S., & Taylor, H. A. (2000). Not all narrative shifts function equally. Memory and Cognition, 28, 1257-1266.
32. Seixas, P. (1994). When psychologists discuss historical thinking: A historian's perspective. Educational Psychologist, 29, 107-109.
33. van den Broek, P. (1994). Comprehension and memory of narrative text: Inferences and coherence. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 539-588). New York: Academic Press.
34. Wahlberg, T., & Magliano, J. P. (2004). The ability of high function individuals with autism to comprehend written texts. Discourse Processes, 38, 119-144.
35. Wiley, J., & Rayner, K. (2000). Effects of titles on the processing of text lexically ambiguous words: Evidence from eye movements. Memory and Cognition, 28, 1011-1021.
36. Wiley, J., & Voss, J. F. (1999). Constructing arguments from multiple sources: Tasks that promote understanding and not just memory for text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 1-11.
37. Wineburg S. S. (2000). Making historical sense. In P. Stearns, P. Seixas, & S. Wineburg (Eds.), Knowing, teaching and learning history: National and international perspectives. New York: NYU Press, 306-325.
38. Zwaan, R. A. (1996). Processing narrative time shifts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1196-1207.
39. Zwaan, R. A., Langston, M. C., & Graesser, A. C. (1995). The construction of situation models in narrative comprehension: An event-indexing model. Psychological Science, 6, 292-297.
40. Zwaan, R. A., Magliano, J. P., & Graesser, A. C. (1995). Dimensions of situation model construction in narrative comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 386-397.
41. Zwaan, R. A., & van Oostendorp, H. (1993). Do readers construct spatial representations in naturalistic story comprehension? Discourse Processes, 16, 125-143.
42. Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 162-185.