Assessing readability formula differences with written health information materials: Application, results, and recommendations

Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy

Volumn 9, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 503-516

  Wang, Lih Wern ^a   Miller, Michael J ^a   Schmitt, Michael R ^b   Wen, Frances K ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

^b VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA TULSA   (United States)

Author keywords

Health literacy; Readability; Readability formula

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; COMPREHENSION; HEALTH LITERACY; HUMAN; MEDICAL INFORMATION; READABILITY FORMULA; READING;

HEALTH LITERACY; READABILITY; READABILITY FORMULA;

ALGORITHMS; COMPREHENSION; HEALTH COMMUNICATION; HEALTH LITERACY; HUMANS; READING;

EID: 84884414592     PISSN: 15517411     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2012.05.009     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Kutner M., Greenberg E., Jin Y., Paulsen C. The Health Literacy of America's Adults: Results From the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy (NCES 2006-483) 2006, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC.
2. U.S.Department of Health and Human Services.Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion National Action Plan To Improve Health Literacy 2010, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC.
3. D'Alessandro D.M., Kingsley P., Johnson-West J. The readability of pediatric patient education materials on the World Wide Web. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2001, 155:807-812.
4. Wolf M.S., Davis T.C., Shrank W.H., Neuberger M., Parker R.M. A critical review of FDA-approved medication guides. Patient Educ Couns 2006, 62:316-322.
5. Paasche-Orlow M.K., Taylor H.A., Brancati F.L. Readability standards for informed-consent forms as compared with actual readability. N Engl J Med 2003, 348:721-726.
6. Kimberlin CL, Winterstein AG. Expert and consumer evaluation of consumer medication information-2008 (Final report to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the Food and Drug Administration), University of Florida, November 4,2008.
7. Svarstad B.L., Bultman D.C., Mount J.K., Tabak E.R. Evaluation of written prescription information provided in community pharmacies: a study in eight states. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) 2003, 43:383-393.
8. Svarstad B.L., Mount J.K., Tabak E.R. Expert and consumer evaluation of patient medication leaflets provided in U.S. pharmacies. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) 2005, 45:443-451.
9. Vallance J.K., Taylor L.M., Lavallee C. Suitability and readability assessment of educational print resources related to physical activity: implications and recommendations for practice. Patient Educ Couns 2008, 72:342-349.
10. Matthews T.L., Sewell J.C. State Official's Guide to Health Literacy 2002, Council of State Governments, Lexington, KY.
11. DuBay W.H. The Principles of Readability 2004, Impact Information, Costa Mesa, CA.
12. Gunning R. The Technique of Clear Writing 1968, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, NY. Revised ed.
13. Sticht T.G. Research toward the design, development and evaluation of a job-functional literacy training program for the United States Army. Lit Discuss 1973, 4:339-369.
14. Flesch R.F. A new readability yardstick. J Appl Psychol 1948, 32:221-233.
15. Dale E., Chall J.S. A Formula for Predicting Readability (Research Bulletin) 1948, Bureau of Educational Research, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
16. McCall W.A., Schroeder L.C. McCall-Crabbs Standard Test Lessons in Reading 1979, Teachers College Press, New York, NY.
17. McLaughlin G.H. SMOG grading: a new readability formula. J Read 1969, 12:639-646.
18. Powers R.D., Sumners W.A., Kearl B.E. A recalculation of four adult readability formulas. J Educ Psychol 1958, 49:99-105.
19. Chall J.S., Dale E. Readability Revisited: The New Dale-Chall Readability Formula 1995, Brookline Books, Cambridge, UK.
20. Ley P., Florio T. The use of readability formulas in health care. Psychol Health Med 1996, 1:7-28.
21. Friedman D.B., Hoffman-Goetz L. A systematic review of readability and comprehension instruments used for print and web-based cancer information. Health Educ Behav 2006, 33:352-373.
22. Doak C.C., Doak L.G., Root J.H. Teaching Patients With Low Literacy Skills 1996, J.B. Lippincott Company, Philadelphia, PA. 2nd ed.
23. Meade C.D., Smith C.F. Readability formulas: cautions and criteria. Patient Educ Couns 1991, 17:153-158.
24. Mailloux S.L., Johnson M.E., Fisher D.G., Pettibone T.J. How reliable is computerized assessment of readability?. Comput Nurs 1995, 13:221-225.
25. Spadaro D.C., Robinson L.A., Smith L.T. Assessing readability of patient information materials. Am J Hosp Pharm 1980, 37:215-221.
26. Spadero D.C. Assessing readability of patient information materials. Pediatr Nurs 1983, 9:274-278.
27. National Center for Education Statistics. National Assessment of Adult Literacy (NAAL). Available at: Accessed 22.07.09. http://nces.edu.gov/naal/index.asp.
28. Wolters Kluwer. OvidSP. Available at: Accessed 22.07.09. http://www.ovid.com/site/index.jsp.
29. American Academy of Family Physicians Information from your family doctor. Depression in children and teens. Am Fam Physician 2007, 75:83-84.
30. American Academy of Family Physicians Information from your family doctor. Depression: what you should know. Am Fam Physician 2006, 74:1395-1396.
31. American Academy of Family Physicians Information from your family doctor. Treating depression: what you should know. Am Fam Physician 2008, 77:795-796.
32. Familydoctor.org editorial staff. Depression. 2008. Available at: Accessed 10.06.09. http://familydoctor.org/online/famdocen/home/common/mentalhealth/depression/046.print.printerview.html.
33. Apothecon. Desyrel. 2005. Available at: Accessed 22.05.09. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2005/18207s030lbl.pdf.
34. Lily. Prozac. 2009. Available at: Accessed 22.05.09. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2009/018936s075s077lbl.pdf.
35. National Health Information Center. Talk with your doctor about depression. Available at: Accessed 10.6.09. http://www.healthfinder.gov/prevention/PrintTopic.aspx?topicID=33.
36. Torpy J.M., Burke A.E., Glass R.M., Torpy J.M., Burke A.E., Glass R.M. JAMA patient page. Depression. JAMA 2008, 300:2202.
37. Mayo Clinic Staff. Depression (Major depression). 2008. Available at: Accessed 10.06.09. http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/depression/DS00175/METHOD=print.
38. American Psychiatric Association. A closer look at major depression. 2001. Available at: Accessed 10.06.09. http://www.medem.com/medlib/print/ZZZ3J5DV2KC.
39. Medline Plus. Depression. Available at: Accessed 10.06.09. http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/print/depression.html.
40. NIH Senior Health. Depression. Available at: Accessed 3.08.09. http://nihseniorhealth.gov/depression/printerFriendly.html?allTopics=entireTopic&images=.
41. Parkland Patient Education Department of Nursing Education. About depression. 2004. Available at: Accessed 8.06.09. http://www.parklandhospital.com/patients_visitors/health_information/pdf/IH-I/I-119Abt%20Depr.pdf.
42. New M. Depression. 2007. Available at: Accessed 10.06.09. http://kidshealth.org/PageManager.jsp?dn=KidsHealth&lic=1&ps=207&cat_id=20448&article_set=32845.
43. World Health Organization. Depression. Available at: Accessed 10.06.09. http://www.who.int/mental_health/management/depression/definition/en/print.html.
44. University of Oklahoma Health Science Center. Robert M. Bird Library. Consumer/patient info. Available at: Accessed 10.06.09. http://library.ouhsc.edu/HP_Home.cfm?where=Site_Content/Reference/RI_ConsumerInfo.cfm.
45. Barrett S.E., Puryear J.S., Westpheling K. Health Literacy Practices in Primary Care Settings: Examples From the Field 2008, Commonwealth Fund, New York, NY.
46. Kincaid J.P., Fishburne R.P., Rodgers R.L., Chissom B.S. Derivation of New Readability Formulas (Automated Readability Index, Fog Count and Flesch Reading Ease Formula) for Navy Enlisted Personnel 1975, Naval Technical Training Command, Springfield, IL, RBR-8-75.
47. Fry E. A readability formula that saves time. J Reading 1968, 11:513-516. 575-578.
48. Caylor J.S., Sticht T.G. Development of a Simple Readability Index for Job Reading Material 1973, Division 3, Human Resources Research Organization, Monterey, CA.
49. Readability Calculations [Computer Program]. Version 7.0 2005, Micro Power & Light Company, Dallas, TX.
50. The Dale-Chall Formula [Computer Program]. Version 1.1 2005, Micro Power & Light Company, Dallas, TX.
51. Microsoft Office Word 2007 [Computer Program]. Version 12.0.6514.5000 SP2 MSO 12.0.6529.5000 2006, Microsoft Corporation, Santa Rosa, CA.
52. Olson A.V. A question of reading validity. J Res Dev Educ 1986, 19:33-40.
53. Bruce B, Rubin A, Starr K. Why readability formulas fail. Reading Education Report No. 28, University of Illinois, Urbana Center for the Study of Reading, 1981. BBN-R-4715.
54. Bormuth J.R. New developments in readability research. Readability in 1968 1968, 1-6. National Council of Teachers of English, Champaign, IL. J.R. Bormuth (Ed.).
55. Taylor W.L. "Cloze procedure": a new tool for measuring readability. J Q 1953, 30:415-433.
56. Flesch R.F. The Art of Readable Writing 1949, Harper & Brothers Publishers, New York, NY.
57. Jorgenson G.W. An analysis of teacher judgments of reading level. Am Educ Res J 1975, 12:67-75.
58. McLaughlin GH. SMOG readability calculator. 2008. Available at: Accessed 10.06.09. http://www.harrymclaughlin.com/SMOG.htm.
59. Gray W.S., Leary B.E. What Makes a Book Readable 1935, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
60. Klare G.R., Buck B. Know Your Reader (The Scientific Approach to Readability) 1954, Hermitage House, New York, NY.