Comparing ovarian radiation doses in flat-panel and conventional angiography during uterine artery embolization: A randomized clinical trial

Iranian Journal of Radiology

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 111-115

  Firouznia, Kavous ^a   Ghanaati, Hossein ^a   Sharafi, Aliakbar ^b   Abahashemi, Firouze ^a   Hashemi, Hassan ^a   Jalali, Amir Hossein ^a   Shakiba, Madjid ^a  

^a TEHRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

^b IRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

Author keywords

Angiography; Embolization; Radiation; Therapeutic; Uterine Artery

Indexed keywords

POLYVINYL ALCOHOL;

ADULT; ANGIOGRAPHY; ANGIOGRAPHY DEVICE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; DOSIMETRY; FEMALE; FLAT PANEL ANGIOGRAPHY; FLUOROSCOPY; GONAD DOSE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; UTERINE ARTERY EMBOLIZATION;

EID: 84884403421     PISSN: 17351065     EISSN: 20082711     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5812/iranjradiol.13264     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Spies JB, Scialli AR, Jha RC, Imaoka I, Ascher SM, Fraga VM, et al. Initial Results from Uterine Fibroid Embolization for Symptomatic Leiomyomata. J Vasc Inter Radiol. 1999;10(9):1149-1157.
2. Pelage JP, Le Dref O, Soyer P, Kardache M, Dahan H, Abitbol M, et al. Fibroid-related menorrhagia: treatment with superselective embolization of the uterine arteries and midterm follow-up. Radiology. 2000;215(2):428-31.
3. Firouznia K, Ghanaati H, Sanaati M, Jalali AH, Shakiba M. Uterine artery embolization in 101 cases of uterine fibroids: do size, location, and number of fibroids affect therapeutic success and complications? Cardiovasc Inter Radiol. 2008;31(3):521-6.
4. Fallahi A, Pooyan M, Ghanaati H, Oghabian MA, Khotanlou H, Shakiba M, et al. Uterine segmentation and volume measurement in uterine fibroid patients' MRI using fuzzy C-mean algorithm and morphological operations. Iran J Radiol. 2011;8(3):150-6.
5. Spahn M, Strotzer M, Volk M, Bohm S, Geiger B, Hahm G, et al. Digital radiography with a large-area, amorphous-silicon, flat-panel X-ray detector system. Invest Radiol. 2000;35(4):260-6.
6. Neitzel U, Boehm A, Maack I. Comparison of low-contrast detail detectability with five different conventional and digital radiographic imaging systems. Med Image. 2000:216-223.
7. Geijer H, Beckman KW, Andersson T, Persliden J. Image quality vs. radiation dose for a flat-panel amorphous silicon detector: a phantom study. Eur Radiol. 2001;11(9):1704-9.
8. Suzuki S, Furui S, Kobayashi I, Yamauchi T, Kohtake H, Takeshita K, et al. Radiation dose to patients and radiologists during transcatheter arterial embolization: comparison of a digital flat-panel system and conventional unit. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;185(4):855-9.
9. Tsapaki V, Kottou S, Kollaros N, Dafnomili P, Koutelou M, Vano E, et al. Comparison of a conventional and a flat-panel digital system in interventional cardiology procedures. Br J Radiol. 2004;77(919):562-7.
10. Kitai T, Ogawa T, Sano S. [Patient absorbed dose in coronary angiography determined by the flat panel digital detector X-ray system]. Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi. 2003;59(3):423-6.
11. Spies JB, Pelage JP. Uterine Artery Embolization And Gynecologic Embolotherapy. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 2005.
12. Spies JB, Ascher SA, Roth AR, Kim J, Levy EB, Gomez-Jorge J. Uterine artery embolization for leiomyomata. Obs Gynec. 2001;98(1):29-34.
13. Firouznia K, Ghanaati H, Sanaati M, Jalali AH, Shakiba M. Pregnancy after uterine artery embolization for symptomatic fibroids: a series of 15 pregnancies. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192(6):1588-92.
14. McLucas B, Goodwin S, Adler L, Rappaport A, Reed R, Perrella R. Pregnancy following uterine fibroid embolization. Int J of Gynaec Obs. 2001;74(1):1-7.
15. Cohnen M, Poll LW, Puettmann C, Ewen K, Saleh A, Mödder U. Effective doses in standard protocols for multi-slice CT scanning. Eur Radiol. 2003; 13:1148-1153.
16. Nikolic B, Spies JB, Lundsten MJ, Abbara S. Patient radiation dose associated with uterine artery embolization. Radiology. 2000;214(1):121-5.
17. Bahreyni Toossi MT, Malekzadeh M. Radiation dose to newborns in neonatal intensive care units. Iran J Radiol. 2012;9(3):145-9.
18. Nikolic B, Abbara S, Levy E, Imaoka I, Lundsten ML, Jha RC, et al. Influence of radiographic technique and equipment on absorbed ovarian dose associated with uterine artery embolization. J Vasc Intervent Radiol. 2000; 11:1173-1178.
19. Vetter S, Schultz FW, Strecker EP, Zoetelief J. Patient radiation exposure in uterine artery embolization of leiomyomata: calculation of organ doses and effective dose. Eur Radiol. 2004;14(5):842-8.
20. Broadhead DA, Chapple CL, Faulkner K. The impact of digital imaging on patient doses during barium studies. Br J Radiol 1995;68:992-6.
21. Tsapaki V, Kottou S, Kollaros N, Kyriakidis Z, Neofotistou V. Comparison of a CCD and a flat-panel digital system in an Interventional Cardiology Laboratory. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2005;117(1-3):93-6.