Unifying and generalizing the two strands of evo-devo

Trends in Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 28, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 584-591

  Parsons, Kevin J ^a   Albertson, R Craig ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIVERGENCE; EMERGENCE; EVOLUTION; GENOMICS; PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY; RESEARCH;

DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY; EVALUATION STUDY; EVOLUTION; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MORPHOGENESIS; PHENOTYPE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; REVIEW;

BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; MORPHOGENESIS; PHENOTYPE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI;

EID: 84884350773     PISSN: 01695347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2013.06.009     Document Type: Review

References (77)

1. Roush W., Pennisi E. Growing pains: evo-devo researchers straddle cultures. Science 1997, 277:38-39.
2. Dalton R. Biologists flock to 'evo-devo' in a quest to read the recipes of life. Nature 2000, 403:125.
3. Goodman C.S., Coughlin B.C. The evolution of evo-devo biology. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2000, 97:4424-4425.
4. Hall B.K. Evo-devo or devo-evo: does it matter?. Evol. Dev. 2000, 2:177-178.
5. Raff R.A., et al. Chronicling the birth of a discipline. Evol. Dev. 1999, 1:1-2.
6. Adams D.C., et al. Geometric morphometrics: ten years of progress following the 'revolution'. Ital. J. Zool. 2002, 71:5-16.
7. Kingsley D.M., Peichel C.L. The molecular genetics of evolutionary change in sticklebacks. Biology of the Three-Spine Stickleback 2007, 41-81. CRC Press. S. Ostlund-Nilsson (Ed.).
8. Klingenberg C.P. Evolution and development of shape: integrating quantitative approaches. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2010, 11:623-635.
9. Colosimo P.F., et al. Widespread parallel evolution in sticklebacks by repeated fixation of Ectodysplasin alleles. Science 2005, 307:1928-1933.
10. Steiner C.C., et al. Adaptive variation in beach mice produced by two interacting pigmentation genes. PLoS Biol. 2007, 5:e219.
11. Protas M., et al. Regressive evolution in the Mexican cave tetra, Astyanax mexicanus. Curr. Biol. 2007, 17:452-454.
12. Gross J.B., et al. Synteny and candidate gene prediction using an anchored linkage map of Astyanax mexicanus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2008, 105:20106-20111.
13. Provine W.B. The Origins of Theoretical Population Genetics 1971, University of Chicago Press.
14. Fisher R.A. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection 1930, Oxford University Press.
15. Lande R., Arnold S.J. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 1983, 37:1210-1226.
16. Young N.M., et al. Integrated quantitative analyses link modulation of Sonic hedgehog (SHH) cell signaling to continuous phenotypic variation in the face. Development 2010, 137:3405-3409.
17. Brugmann S.A., et al. Comparative gene expression analysis of avian embryonic facial structures reveals new candidates for human craniofacial disorders. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2010, 19:920-930.
18. Sears K.E., et al. Molecular determinants of marsupial limb integration and constraint. From Clone to Bone: The Synergy of Morphological and Molecular Tools in Palaeobiology 2012, Cambridge University Press, pp.257-278. R.J. Asher, J. Muller (Eds.).
19. Kelly E.M., Sears K.E. Limb specialization in living marsupial and eutherian mammals: an investigation of constraints on mammalian limb evolution. J. Mammal. 2011, 92:1038-1049.
20. Cooper J., Steppan S.J. Developmental constraint on the evolution of marsupial forelimb morphology. Aust. J. Zool. 2010, 58:1-15.
21. Sears K.E. Constraints on the morphological evolution of marsupial shoulder girdles. Evolution 2004, 58:2353-2370.
22. Kelly M., Sears K.E. Limb integration in New World marsupials. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2011, 102:22-36.
23. Goswami A., et al. Developmental modularity and the marsupial-placental dichotomy. J. Exp. Zool. B Mol. Dev. Evol. 2009, 312:186-195.
24. Bennett V., Goswami A. Does developmental strategy drive limb integration in marsupials and monotremes?. Mamm. Biol. 2011, 76:79-83.
25. Sears K.E., et al. Disparate Igf1 expression and growth in the fore- and hind limbs of a marsupial mammal (Monodelphis domestica). J. Exp. Zool. B Mol. Dev. Evol. 2012, 318:279-293.
26. Mallarino R.M., Abzhanov A. Paths less travelled: evo-devo approaches to investigating animal morphological evolution. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2012, 28:743-763.
27. Campàs O., et al. Scaling and shear transformations capture beak shape variation in Darwin's finches. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107:3356-3360.
28. Roberts R.B., et al. Craniofacial divergence and ongoing adaptation via the hedgehog pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108:13194-13199.
29. Albertson R.C., et al. Integration and evolution of the cichlid mandible: the molecular basis of alternate feeding strategies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005, 102:16287-16292.
30. Kimmel C.B., et al. Modes of developmental outgrowth and shaping of a craniofacial bone in zebrafish. PLoS ONE 2010, 5:e9475.
31. Huycke T.R., et al. Hedgehog-dependent proliferation drives modular growth during morphogenesis of a dermal bone. Development 2012, 139:2371-2380.
32. Kimmel C.B., et al. Developmental dissociation in morphological evolution of the stickleback opercle. Evol. Dev. 2012, 14:326-337.
33. Kimmel C.B., et al. Independent axes of genetic variation and parallel evolutionary divergence of opercle bone shape in threespine stickleback. Evolution 2012, 66:419-434.
34. Kimmel C.B., et al. Evolution and development of facial bone morphology in threespine sticklebacks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005, 102:5791-5796.
35. Robinson B.W., et al. Trade-offs of ecological specialization: an intraspecific comparison of pumpkinseed sunfish phenotypes. Ecology 1996, 77:170-178.
36. Bolnick D.I., Lau O.L. Predictable patterns of disruptive selection in stickleback in postglacial lakes. Am. Nat. 2008, 172:1-11.
37. Roberts R.B., et al. Sexual conflict resolved by invasion of a novel sex determiner in Lake Malawi cichlid fishes. Science 2009, 326:998-1001.
38. Chan Y.F., et al. Adaptive evolution of pelvic reduction in sticklebacks by recurrent deletion of a Pitx1 enhancer. Science 2010, 327:302-305.
39. Womack J.E., et al. Genomics of complex traits. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2012, 1271:33-36.
40. de los Campos G., et al. Predicting genetic predisposition in humans: the promise of whole-genome markers. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2010, 11:880-886.
41. Boyko A.R. The domestic dog: man's best friend in the genomic era. Genome Biol. 2011, 12:216.
42. Wayne R.K., von Holdt B.M. Evolutionary genomics of dog domestication. Mamm. Genome 2012, 23:3-18.
43. Malek T.B., et al. Admixture mapping of male nuptial colour and body shape in a recently formed hybrid population of threespine stickleback. Mol. Ecol. 2012, 21:5265-5279.
44. Shapiro M.D., et al. Genomic diversity and evolution of the head crest in the rock pigeon. Science 2013, 339:1063-1067.
45. Yamamoto Y., et al. Pleiotropic functions of embryonic sonic hedgehog expression link jaw and taste bud amplification with eye loss during cavefish evolution. Dev. Biol. 2009, 330:200-211.
46. Alberch P., Gale E.A. A developmental analysis of an evolutionary trend: digital reduction in amphibians. Evolution 1985, 39:8-23.
47. Sylvester J.B., et al. Brain diversity evolves via differences in patterning. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107:9718-9723.
48. O'Quin K.E., et al. New evidence for the role of heterochrony in the repeated evolution of cichlid opsin expression. Evol. Dev. 2011, 13:193-203.
49. Pigliucci M. Is evolvability evolvable?. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2008, 9:75-82.
50. Bissell E.K., Diggle P.K. Modular genetic architecture of floral morphology in Nicotiana: quantitative genetic and comparative phenotypic approaches to floral integration. J. Evol. Biol. 2010, 23:1744-1758.
51. Zhang R., et al. Disruption of the petal identity gene APETALA3-3 is highly correlated with loss of petals within the buttercup family (Ranunculaceae). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2013, 110:5074-5079.
52. Savriama Y., et al. Geometric morphometrics of corolla shape: dissecting components of symmetric and asymmetric variation in Erysimum mediohispanicum (Brassicaceae). New Phytol. 2012, 196:945-954.
53. Preston J.C., et al. Gradual disintegration of the floral symmetry gene network is implicated in the evolution of a wind-pollination syndrome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108:2343-2348.
54. Moczek A.P. On the origins of novelty and diversity in development and evolution: a case study on beetle horns. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 2009, 74:289-296.
55. Macdonald W.P., et al. Butterfly wings shaped by a molecular cookie cutter: evolutionary radiation of lepidopteran wing shapes associated with a derived Cut/wingless wing margin boundary system. Evol. Dev. 2010, 12:296-304.
56. Klingenberg C.P., et al. Quantitative genetics of shape in cricket wings: developmental integration in a functional structure. Evolution 2010, 64:2935-2951.
57. Lommen S.T., et al. Development of a wingless morph in the ladybird beetle, Adalia bipunctata. Evol. Dev. 2009, 11:278-289.
58. Shapiro M.D., et al. Genetic and developmental basis of evolutionary pelvic reduction in threespine sticklebacks. Nature 2004, 428:717-723. Erratum: Nature 439, 1014.
59. Miller C.T., et al. cis-Regulatory changes in Kit ligand expression and parallel evolution of pigmentation in sticklebacks and humans. Cell 2007, 131:1179-1189.
60. Albert A.Y., et al. The genetics of adaptive shape shift in stickleback: pleiotropy and effect size. Evolution 2008, 62:76-85.
61. Yamamoto Y., et al. Hedgehog signalling controls eye degeneration in blind cavefish. Nature 2004, 431:844-847.
62. Dufton M., et al. Early lens ablation causes dramatic long-term effects on the shape of bones in the craniofacial skeleton of Astyanax mexicanus. PLoS ONE 2012, 7:e50308.
63. Fraser G.J., et al. A periodic pattern generator for dental diversity. BMC Biol. 2008, 6:32.
64. Parsons K.J., et al. Modularity of the oral jaws is linked to repeated changes in the craniofacial shape of African cichlids. Int. J. Evol. Biol. 2011, 2011:64150.
65. Marroig G., Cheverud J.M. A comparison of phenotypic variation and covariation patterns and the role of phylogeny, ecology, and ontogeny during cranial evolution of new world monkeys. Evolution 2001, 55:2576-2600.
66. Ehrich T.H., et al. Pleiotropic effects on mandibular morphology I. Developmental morphological integration and differential dominance. J. Exp. Zool. B Mol. Dev. Evol. 2003, 296:58-79.
67. Klingenberg C.P., et al. Integration and modularity of quantitative trait locus effects on geometric shape in the mouse mandible. Genetics 2004, 166:1909-1921.
68. Jackman W.R., et al. Fgf signaling is required for zebrafish tooth development. Dev. Biol. 2004, 274:139-157.
69. Sato A., et al. FGF8 signaling is chemotactic for cardiac neural crest cells. Dev. Biol. 2011, 354:18-30.
70. de Melker A.A., et al. Cellular localization and signaling activity of beta-catenin in migrating neural crest cells. Dev. Dyn. 2004, 230:708-726.
71. Heo J.S., et al. Wnt/β-catenin signaling enhances osteoblastogenic differentiation from human periodontal ligament fibroblasts. Mol. Cell 2010, 30:449-454.
72. Ho D.M., Whitman M. TGF-beta signaling is required for multiple processes during Xenopus tail regeneration. Dev. Biol. 2008, 315:203-216.
73. Mahmood A., et al. Enhanced differentiation of human embryonic stem cells to mesenchymal progenitors by inhibition of TGF-beta/activin/nodal signaling using SB-431542. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2010, 25:1216-1233.
74. Chablais F., Jazwinska A. The regenerative capacity of the zebrafish heart is dependent on TGFβ signaling. Development 2012, 139:1921-1930.
75. Ferrari-Toninelli G., et al. Targeting Notch pathway induces growth inhibition and differentiation of neuroblastoma cells. Neuro Oncol. 2010, 12:1231-1243.
76. Wang T., et al. Notch is the key factor in the process of fetal liver stem/progenitor cells differentiation into hepatocytes. Dev. Growth Differ. 2012, 54:605-617.
77. Kim J., et al. Itraconazole and arsenic trioxide inhibit Hedgehog pathway activation and tumor growth associated with acquired resistance to smoothened antagonists. Cancer Cell 2013, 23:23-34.