Predicting course performance from homework habits

ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages

  Rawson, Kevin ^a   Stahovich, Tom ^a  

^a University of California Riverside   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMOUNT OF INK; COURSE PERFORMANCE; EARLY WARNING SYSTEM; FORCE CONCEPT INVENTORY; HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENTS; PREDICTIVE ABILITIES; QUANTITATIVE FEATURES; REGRESSION MODEL;

ENGINEERING EDUCATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

STUDENTS;

EID: 84884338254     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. Rogers Hall. Video Recording as Theory. In D. Lesh and A. Kelly (Eds.) Handbook of Research Design in Mathematics and Science Education, 647-664. Mahweh, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2000.
2. Cristóbal Romero and Sebastián Ventura. Educational data mining: A Review of the State of the Art. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part C: Applications and Reviews, 40(6):601-618, 2010.
3. Paul Steif and Anna Dollár. Study of Usage Patterns and Learning Gains in a Web-based Interactive Static Course. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(4):321-333, 2009.
4. Sharon Oviatt, Alex Arthur, and Julia Cohen. Quiet Interfaces that help students think. In Proceedings of the 19th annual ACM symposium on user interface software and technology (UIST '06), 191-200, New York, NY, USA, 2006.
5. Paul Blanc. Solving a Non-routine Problem: What Helps, What Hinders? In Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, 19(2):1-6, 1999.
6. Behrouz Minaei-Bidgoli, Deborah A. Kashy, Gerd Kortemeyer, and Williaim F. Punch, Predicting Student Performance: An Application of Data Mining Methods with the Educational Web-Based System LON-CAPA. In Proceedings of 33rd ASEE/ISEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Boulder, CO, USA, 2003.
7. Antti Rasila, Linda Havola, Helle Majander, and Pekka Alestalo. Automatic assessment in engineering mathematics: evaluation of the impact. In Myller, E. (ed.), ReflekTori 2010 Symposium of Engineering Education, pp. 37-45. Aalto University School of Science and Technology, 2010.
8. John Chen, Dexter Whittinghill, and Jennifer Kadlowec. Classes that click: Fast, rich feedback to enhance student learning and satisfaction. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(2):159-168, 2010.
9. Timothy S. Van Arsdale and Thomas Stahovich, Does Neatness Count? What the Organization of Student Work Says About Understanding. In Proceedings of the 119th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, San Antonio, TX, 2012.
10. David Hestnes, Malcom Wells, and Gregg Swackhamer, Force Concept Inventory. The Physics Teacher, Vol. 30, Issue 3, 141-158, Mar 1992.
11. Patricia A. Alexander and Judith E. Judy, The Interaction of Domain-Specific and Strategic Knowledge in Academic Performance. Review of Educational Research, Vol. 58, No. 4, 375-404, 1988.
12. C. Lee, J. Jordan, T. F. Stahovich, and J. Herold, Newton's Pen II: An intelligent, sketch-based tutoring system and its sketch processing techniques. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Sketch-Based Interfaces and Modeling (SBIM '12), pp. 57-65, 2012.
13. Hanlung Lin, Thomas Stahovich, and James Herold, Automatic Handwritten Statics Solution Classification and its Applications in Predicting Student Performance. In Proceedings of 119th Annual ASEE Conference and Exposition, San Antonio, TX, 2012.