Quiet interfaces that help students think

UIST: Proceedings of the Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Softaware and Technology

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 191-200

  Oviatt, Sharon ^a,b   Arthur, Alex ^c   Cohen, Julia ^c,d  

^a OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^c Natural Interaction Systems   (United States)

^d DARTMOUTH COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Communications; E Learning and education; Handheld and mobile computing; Input and interaction technologies; Pen based interfaces; Performance metrics; Tangible UIs; Universal (or disability access)

Indexed keywords

DISABILITY ACCESS; INTERACTION TECHNOLOGIES; PEN-BASED INTERFACES; PERFORMANCE METRICS;

E-LEARNING; HAND HELD COMPUTERS; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER GRAPHICS; MOBILE COMPUTING; STORAGE ALLOCATION (COMPUTER); TELECOMMUNICATION LINKS;

USER INTERFACES;

EID: 34547324207     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1166253.1166284     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Abowd, G. Classroom 2000: An experiment with the instrumentation of a living educational environment, IBM Systems Journal, 1999, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 508-530.
2. Anderson, R., Hoyer, C., Wolfman, S. and Anderson, R. A study of digital ink in lecture presentation. In Proceedings of CHI'04 Human Factors in Computing Systems (April 24-29, Vienna Austria), ACM/SIGCHI, NY, 2004, pp. 567-574.
3. Anoto technology, http://www.anoto.com/
4. Anthony, L., Yang, J. and Koedinger, K. Evaluation of multimodal input for entering mathematical equations on the computer, In Proceedings of CHI'05 Human Factors in Computing Systems (April 2-7, Portland Oregon), ACM/SIGCHI, NY, 2005, pp. 1184-1187.
5. Bach, D. Math gaps grows for minority students: Difference in WASL scores shows significant jump at seventh grade, Seattle Post-Intelligencer, Nov. 14, 2005.
6. Baddeley, A. Working Memory, Oxford University Press, NY, 1986.
7. Cohen, P. and McGee, D. Tangible multimodal interfaces for safety-critical applications, Communications of the ACM, 2004, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 41-46.
8. Haas, C. Does the medium make a difference? Two studies of writing with pen and paper and with computers, Human Computer Interaction, 1989, vol. 4, pp. 149-169.
9. Landay, J. and Myers, B. Sketching interfaces: Toward more human interface design, IEEE Computer, March 2001, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 56-64.
10. LaViola, J. and Zeleznik, R. MathPad2: A System for the creation and exploration of mathematical sketches, A CM Transactions on Graphics, Proceedings of SIGGRAPH, 2004, 23(3):432-440.
11. Leapfrog, (http://www.leapfrog.com), 2006.
12. Liao, C., Guimbretiere, F. and Hinckley, K. Papier-Craft: A system for interactive paper, In Proceedings of UIST'05, ACM/SIGCHI, NY, 2005, pp. 241-244.
13. Marriott, M. Blacks turn to internet highway, and digital divide starts to close, New York Times, March 31, 2006.
14. Mousavi, S., Low, R. and Sweller, J. Reducing cognitive load by mixing auditory and visual presentation modes, Journal of Educational Psychology, 1995, vol. 87, no. 2, 319-334.
15. Paas, F., Tuovinen, J., Tabbers, H. and van Gerven, P. Cognitive load measurement as a means to advance cognitive load theory, Educational Psychologist, 2003, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 63-71.
16. Pederson, E., McCall, K., Moran, T. and Halasz, F. Tivoli: An electronic whiteboard for informal group meetings, In Proceedings of INTERCHI'93 Human Factors in Computing Systems (April 24-29, Amsterdam), ACM/SIGCHI, NY, 1993, pp. 391-398.
17. Plamondon, R. and Srihari, S. On-line and off-line handwriting recognition: A comprehensive survey, IEEE P AMI, Jan. 2000, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 63-84.
18. Smithies, S., Novins, K. and Arvo, J. Equation entry and editing via handwriting and gesture recognition, Behavior and Information Technology, 2001, vol. 20, pp. 53-67.
19. van Merrienboer, J. and Sweller, J. Cognitive load theory and complex learning: Recent developments and future directions, Educational Psychology Review, 2005, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 147-177.
20. Winne, P. H. and Perry, N. E. Measuring self-regulated learning. In Handbook of Self-Regulation (ed. by M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich & M. Zeidner), Academic Press, Orlando FL., 2000, pp. 531-566.