Histologic study of periprosthetic osteolytic lesions after AES total ankle replacement. A 22 case series

Orthopaedics and Traumatology: Surgery and Research

Volumn 99, Issue 6 SUPPL, 2013, Pages

  Dalat, F ^a   Barnoud, R ^b   Fessy, M H ^a,c   Besse, J L ^a,c  

^a CENTRE HOSPITALIER LYON SUD   (France)

^b CROIX ROUSSE HOSPITAL   (France)

^c Lyon University   (France)

Author keywords

Histology; Periprosthetic osteolysis; Total ankle arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

HYDROXYAPATITE; POLYETHYLENE; TITANIUM;

ANKLE ARTHROPLASTY; ARTICLE; BONE IMPLANT; BONE NECROSIS; BONE RADIOGRAPHY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; FOREIGN BODY; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MALE; OSTEOLYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

HISTOLOGY; PERIPROSTHETIC OSTEOLYSIS; TOTAL ANKLE ARTHROPLASTY;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, ANKLE; BIOPSY; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; OSTEOLYSIS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84884336688     PISSN: None     EISSN: 18770568     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2013.07.009     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Valderrabano V., Pagenstert G., Horisberger M., Knupp M., Hintermann B. Sports and recreation activity of ankle arthritis patients before and after total ankle replacement. Am J Sports Med 2006, 34:993-999.
2. Hintermann B., Valderrabano V. Total ankle replacement. Foot Ankle Clin 2009, 8:375-405.
3. Gougoulias N., Khanna A., Maffuli N. How successful are current ankle replacements? A systematic review of the literature. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010, 468:199-208.
4. Fevang B.T., Lie S.A., Havelin L.I., et al. 257 ankle arthroplasties performed in Norway between1994 and 2005. Acta Orthop 2007, 78:575-583.
5. Henricson A., Skoog A., Carlsson A. The Swedish Ankle Arthroplasty Register: an analysis of 531 arthroplasties between 1993 and 2005. Acta Orthop 2007, 78:569-574.
6. Skyttä E.T., Koivu H., Eskelinen A., Ikävalko M., Paavolainen P., Remes V. Total ankle replacement: a population-based study of 515 cases from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 2010, 81:114-118.
7. Karantana A., Hobson S., Dhar S. The Scandinavian total ankle replacement: survivorship at 5 and 8 years comparable to other series. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010, 468:951-957.
8. Buechel F.F., Buechel F.F., Pappas M.J. Twenty years evaluation of cementless mobile-bearing total ankle replacements. Clin Orthop 2004, 424:19-26.
9. Kofoed H. Scandinavian total ankle replacement (STAR). Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004, 424:73-79.
10. Kofoed Reflection on total ankle replacement. Pathologie du pied et de la cheville 2009, 390-392. Elsevier Masson ed, Paris. T.H. Leemrijse, B. Valtin (Eds.).
11. Knecht S.I., Estin M., Callaghan J.J., Zimmerman M.B., Alliman K.J., Alvine F.G., et al. The Agility total ankle arthroplasty: seven to sixteen-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004, 86:1161-1171.
12. Besse J.L., Brito N., Lienhart C. Clinical evaluation and radiographic assessment of bone lysis of the AES total ankle replacement. Foot Ankle Int 2009, 30:964-975.
13. Asencio J.-G., Leonardi C. Ankle Evolutive System prosthesis: a simple accurate and reliable specific concept for primary and revision ankle surgery. Tech Foot Ankle Surg 2005, 4:119-124.
14. Kitaoka H.B., Alexander I.J., Adelaar R.S., Nunley J.A., Myerson M.S., Sanders M. Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int 1994, 15:349-353.
15. Purdue P.E., Koulouvaris P., Nestor B.J., Sculco T.P. The central role of wear debris in periprosthetic osteolysis. HSS J 2006, 2:102-113.
16. Holt G., Murnaghan C., Reilly J., Meek R.M.D. The biology of aseptic osteolysis. Clin Orthop 2007, 460:240-252.
17. Archibeck M.J., Jacobs J.J., Roebuck K.A., Glant T.T. The basic science of periprosthetic osteolysis. Inst Course Lect 2001, 50:185-195.
18. Ollivere B., Wimhurst J.A., Clark I.M., Donell S.T. Current concepts in osteolysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2012, 94:10-15.
19. Horowitz S.M., Doty S.B., Lane J.M., Burstein A.H. Studies of the mechanism by which the mechanical failure of polymethylmethacrylate leads to bone resorption. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1993, 75:802-813.
20. Catelas I., Petit A., Zukor D.J., Marchand R., Yahia L., Huk O.L. Induction of macrophage apoptosis by ceramic and polyethylene particles in vitro. Biomaterials 1999, 20:625-630.
21. Hollak C.E., van Weely S., van Oers M.H., Aerts J.M. Marked elevation of plasma chitotriosidase activity: a novel hallmark of Gaucher disease. J Clin Invest 1994, 93:1288-1292.
22. Crawford R., Sabokbar A., Wulke A., Murray D.W., Athanasou N.A. Expansion of osteoarthritic cyst associated with wear debris. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998, 80:990-993.
23. Jacobs J.J., Hallab N.J., Urban R.M., Wimmer M.A. Wear particles. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006, 88:99-102.
24. Koivu H., Kohonen I., Sipola E., Alanen K., Vahlberg T., Tiusanen H. Severe periprosthetic osteolytic lesions after the Ankle Evolutive System total ankle replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009, 91:907-914.
25. Morgan S.S., Brooke B., Harris N.J. Total ankle replacement by the Ankle Evolution System: medium-term outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010, 92:61-65.
26. Rodriguez D., Bevernage B.D., Maldague P., Deleu P.A., Tribak K., Leemrijse T. Medium term follow-up of the AES ankle prosthesis: High rate of asymptomatic osteolysis. Foot Ankle Surg 2010, 16(2):54-60.
27. Kokkonen A., Ikävalko M., Tiihonen R., Kautiainen H., Belt E.A. High rate of osteolytic lesions in medium-term follow-up after the AES total ankle replacement. Foot Ankle Int 2011, 32:168-175.
28. Hanna R.S., Haddad S.L., Lazarus M.L. Evaluation of periprosthetic lucency after total ankle arthroplasty: helical CT versus conventional radiography. Foot Ankle Int 2007, 28:921-926.
29. Doets C., Brand R., Nelissen R. Total ankle arthroplasty in inflammatory joint disease with use of two mobile-bearing designs. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006, 88:1272-1284.
30. Schutte B.G., Louwerens J.W. Short-term results of our first Scandinavian total ankle replacements (STAR). Foot Ankle Int 2008, 29:124-127.
31. Bonnin M., Gaudot F., Laurent J.R., Ellis S., Colombier J.A., Judet T. The Salto total ankle arthroplasty: survivorship and analysis of failures at 7 to 11 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011, 469:225-236.
32. Preyssas P., Toullec E., Henry M., Neron J.B., Mabit C., Brilhault J. Total ankle arthroplasty-three-component total ankle arthroplasty in western France: a radiographic study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2012, 98(Suppl.4):S31-S40.
33. Bonnin M., Judet T., Colombier J.A., Buscayret F., Graveleau N., Piriou P. Midterm results of the Salto total ankle prosthesis. Clin Orthop 2004, 424:6-18.
34. Aitken G.K., Bourne R.B., Finlay J.B., Rorabeck C.H., Andreae P.R. Indentation stiffness of the cancellous bone in the distal human tibia. Clin Orthop 1985, 201:264-270.
35. Hvid I., Rasmussen O., Jensen N.C., Nielsen S. Trabecular bone strength profiles at the ankle. Joint Clin Orthop 1985, 199:306-312.
36. Younger A., Penner M., Wing K. Mobile-bearing total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Clin 2008, 13:495-508.
37. Cordonnier C., Sevestre M., Gontier M.F. Foreign bodies after total hip prosthesis. Ann Pathol 1997, 17(2):100-108.