Total ankle replacement by the Ankle Evolution System: Medium-term outcome

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B

Volumn 92, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 61-65

  Morgan, S S ^a   Brooke, B ^a   Harris, N J ^a  

^a CHAPEL ALLERTON HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANKLE ARTHRODESIS; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMPLANT; JOINT SURGERY; MALE; OSTEOARTHRITIS; OSTEOLYSIS; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; SCORING SYSTEM; SKIN TRANSPLANTATION; SURVIVAL RATE; TIBIA FRACTURE; TOTAL ANKLE REPLACEMENT; WOUND DEHISCENCE; ANKLE; ARTHROPLASTY; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROSTHESIS; RADIOGRAPHY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WEIGHT BEARING;

AGED; ANKLE JOINT; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 75649128368     PISSN: 0301620X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.92B1.22360     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Conti SF, Wong YS. Complications of total ankle replacement. Clin Orthop 2001;391:105-14.
2. Knecht SI, Estin M, Callaghan JJ, et al. The Agility total ankle arthroplasty: seven to sixteen-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2004;86-A:1161-71.
3. Kofoed H. A new total ankle joint prosthesis. In: Kossowsky R, Kossowsky N, eds. Materials sciences and implant orthopaedic surgery. Boston: Marinius Nijhoff, 1986:75-84.
4. Buechel FF, Pappas MJ. Survivorship and clinical evaluation of cementless, meniscal-bearing total ankle replacement. Semin Arthroplasty 1992;3:43-50.
5. Stengel D, Bauwens K, Ekkernkamp A, Cramer J. Efficacy of total ankle replacement with meniscal-bearing devices: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2005;125:109-19.
6. Kitaoka HB, Alexander IJ, Adelaar RD, et al. Clinical rating systems for the ankle hindfoot, midfoot, hallux and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int 1994;15:349-53.
7. Wood PLR, Prem H, Sutton C. Total ankle replacement: medium term results in 200 Scandinavian total ankle replacements. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2008;90-B:605-9.
8. Bland JM, Altman DG. Survival probabilities (the Kaplan-Meier method). BMJ 1998;317:1572.
9. Carlsson Å. SIngle- and double-coated star total ankle replacements: a clinical and radiographic follow-up of 109 cases. Orthopäde 2006;35:527-32 (in German).
10. Wood P, Deakin S. Total ankle replacement: the results in 200 ankles. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2003;85-B:334-41.
11. Anderson T, Montgomery F, Carlsson A. Uncemented star total ankle prosthesis: three to eight-year follow-up of fifty-one consecutive ankles. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2003;85-A:1321-9.
12. Spirt A, Assal M, Hansen S. Complications and failure after total ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2004;86-A:1172-8.
13. Doets C, Brand R, Nelissen R. Total ankle arthroplasty in inflammatory joint disease with use of two mobile-bearing designs. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2006;88-A:1272-84.
14. Henricson A, Skoog A, Carlsson A. The Swedish Ankle Arthroplasty Register: an analysis of 531 arthroplasties between 1993 and 2005. Acta Orthop 2007;78:569-74.
15. Hosman AH, Mason RB, Hobbs T, Rothwell AG. A New Zealand national joint registry review of 202 total ankle replacements followed for up to 6 years. Acta Orthop 2007;78:584-91.
16. Haddad SL, Coetzee JC, Estok R, et al. Intermediate and long-term outcomes of total ankle arthroplasty and ankle arthrodesis: a systematic review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2007;89-A:1899-905.
17. Buechal FF Sr, Buechal FF Jr, Pappas MJ. Ten-year evaluation of cementless Buechal-Pappas meniscal bearing total ankle replacement. Foot Ankle Int 2003;24:462-72.
18. Buechal FF Sr, Buechal FF Jr, Pappas MJ. Twenty-year evaluation of cementless mobile-bearing total ankle replacements. Clin Orthop 2004;424:19-26.
19. Kim BS, Choi WJ, YS, Lee JW. Total ankle replacement in moderate to severe varus deformity of the ankle. J Bone Joint [Br] 2009;91-B:1183-90.
20. Wood PL, Sutton C. Mishra V, Suneja R. A randomised, controlled trial of two mobile-bearing total ankle replacements. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2009;91-B:69-74.
21. Hobson SA, Karantana A, Dhar S. Total ankle replacements in patients with significant pre-operative deformity of the hindfoot. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2009;91-B:481-6.
22. Koivu H, Kohonen I, Sipola E, et al. Severe periprosthetic osteolytic lesions after the Ankle Evolutive System total ankle replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2009;91-B:907-14.
23. Deorio JK, Easley ME. Total ankle arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect 2008;57:383-413.
24. Coester LM, Saltzman CL, Leupold J, Pontarelli W. Long-term results following ankle arthrodesis for post-traumatic arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2001;83-A:219-28.
25. SooHoo NF, Zingmond DS, Ko CY. Comparison of re-operation rates following ankle arthrodesis and total ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2007;89-A:2143-9.
26. Piriou P, Culpan P, Mullins M, et al. Ankle replacement versus arthrodesis: a comparative gait analysis study. Foot Ankle 2008;29:3-9.
27. Zerahn B, Kofoed H. Bone mineral density, gait analysis and patient satisfaction before and after ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int 2004;25:208-14.
28. Buechal FF, Pappas MJ, Iorio LJ. New Jersey low contact stress total ankle replacement: biomechanical rationale and review of 23 cementless cases. Foot Ankle 1988;8:279-90.