Managing executive dysfunction following acquired brain injury and stroke using an ecologically valid rehabilitation approach: A study protocol for a randomized, controlled trial

Trials

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Dawson, Deirdre R ^a,b   Anderson, Nicole D ^a   Binns, Malcolm A ^a   Bottari, Carolina ^c   Damianakis, Thecla ^d,e   Hunt, Anne ^b   Polatajko, Helene J ^b   Zwarenstein, Merrick ^f  

^a ROTMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c CENTRE FOR INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH IN REHABILITATION OF GREATER MONTREAL   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WINDSOR   (Canada)

^e Kunin Lunenfeld Applied Research Unit and Department of Food and Nutrition Services and Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care   (Canada)

^f WESTERN UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Cognitive orientation to daily occupational performance; Executive dysfunction; Occupational therapy; Rehabilitation; Strategy training; Stroke; Traumatic brain injury

Indexed keywords

ACQUIRED BRAIN INJURY; ADULT; ARTICLE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; COGNITIVE DEFECT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; EXECUTIVE DYSFUNCTION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RATING SCALE; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; SURVIVOR; TELEPHONE INTERVIEW; VIDEOTAPE;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; BRAIN INJURIES; CLINICAL PROTOCOLS; COGNITION; COGNITION DISORDERS; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; HUMANS; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; PATIENT SELECTION; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; RESEARCH DESIGN; SAMPLE SIZE; SELF REPORT; STROKE; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VIDEO RECORDING;

EID: 84884304472     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17456215     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-306     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Lezak MD. The problem of assessing executive functions. Intl J Psych 1982, 17:281-297.
2. Cicerone K, Levin H, Malec J, Stuss D, Whyte J. Cognitive rehabilitation interventions for executive function: moving from bench to bedside in patients with traumatic brain injury. J Cog Neurosci 2006, 18:1212-1222.
3. Kennedy MRT, Coelho C, Turkstra L, Ylvisaker M, Sohlberg MM, Yorkston K, Chiou HH, Kan PF. Intervention for executive functions after traumatic brain injury: a systematic review, meta-analysis and clinical recommendations. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2008, 18:257-299. 10.1080/09602010701748644, 18569745.
4. Rohling M, Faust M, Beverly B, Demakis G. Effectiveness of cognitive rehabilitation following acquired brain injury: a meta-analytic re-examination of cicerone et al.'s (2000, 2005) Systematic reviews. Neuropsychol 2009, 23:20-39.
5. Cicerone KD, Langenbahn DM, Braden C, Malec JF, Kalmar K, Fraas M, Felicetti T, Laatsch L, Harley JP, Bergquist T, Azulay J, Cantor J, Ashman T. Evidence based cognitive rehabilitation: updated review of the literature from 2003 through 2008. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2011, 92:519-530. 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.11.015, 21440699.
6. Chung CSY, Pollock A, Campbell T, Durward BR, Hagen S. Cognitive rehabilitation for executive dysfunction in adults with stroke or other adult non-progressive acquired brain damage. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013, 4:1-76.
7. Fox E, Riconscente M. Metacognition and self-regulation in James, Piaget & Vygotsky. Educ Psychol Rev 2008, 20:373-389.
8. Luria AR. Higher Cortical Functions in Man 1980, New York: Basic Books, 2.
9. Meichenbaum D. Cognitive-Behaviour Modification: An Integrative Approach 1977, New York: Plenum Press.
10. Levine B, Stuss DT, Winocur G, Binns MA, Fahy L, Mandic M, Bridges K, Robertson IH. Cognitive rehabilitation of the elderly: effects on strategic behavior in relation to goal. J Int Neuropsych Soc 2007, 13:143-152.
11. Rath JF, Simon D, Langenbahn DM, Sherr RL, Diller L. Group treatment of problem-solving deficits in outpatients with traumatic brain injury: a randomised outcome study. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2003, 13:461-488.
12. Spikman JM, Boelen DHE, Lamberts KF, Brouwer WH, Fasotti L. Effects of a multifaceted program for executive dysfunction after acquired brain injury on indications of executive functioning in daily life. J Int Neuropsych Soc 2010, 16:118-129.
13. Miotta EC, Evans JJ, Souza de Lucia MC, Scaff M. Rehabilitation of executive dysfunction: a controlled trial of attention and problem solving treatment group. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2009, 19:517-540. 10.1080/09602010802332108, 18766984.
14. Novakovic-Agopian T, Chen AJ, Rome S, Abrams G, Castelli H, Rossi A, McKim R, Hills N, D'Esposito M. Rehabilitation of executive functioning with training in attention regulation applied to individually defined goals: a pilot study bridging theory, assessment, and treatment. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2011, 26:325-328. 10.1097/HTR.0b013e3181f1ead2, 21169860.
15. Dawson DR, Gaya A, Hunt A, Lemsky C, Levine B, Lo A, Polatajko H. Using the cognitive orientation to occupational performance with adults with traumatic brain injury. Can J Occupl Ther 2009, 76:115-127.
16. Dawson DR, Binns M, Hunt A, Lemsky C, Polatajko HJ. Occupation based strategy training for adults with traumatic brain injury: a pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2013, 94:1959-63.
17. World Health Organization International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health 2001, Geneva: WHO, World Health Organization.
18. Polatajko H, Mandich A. Enabling Occupation in Children: The Cognitive Orientation to Daily Occupational Performance (CO-OP) Approach 2004, Ottawa: CAOT Pub.
19. Campbell M, Fitzpatrick R, Haines A, Kinmonth AL, Sandercock P, Spiegelhalter D, Tyrer P. Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. Brit Med J 2000, 321:694-696. 10.1136/bmj.321.7262.694, 1118564, 10987780.
20. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Mitchie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new medical research council guidance. BMJ 2008, 337:979-983.
21. Hart T. Treatment definition in complex rehabilitation interventions. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2009, 19:824-840. 10.1080/09602010902995945, 19544183.
22. Radloff LS. The CES-D Scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas 1977, 1:385-401.
23. Law M, Baptiste S, McColl MA, Opzoomer A, Polatajko H, Pollock N. Canadian Occupational Performance Measure 1998, Ottawa: CAOT Publications, 3.
24. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences 1988, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, 2.
25. Wechsler D. The Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale - Revised 1985, New York: The Psychological Corporation.
26. Smith A. Symbol Digit Modalities Test 1978, Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
27. Brandt J. The Hopkins verbal learning test: development of a new memory test with six equivalent forms. Clin Neuropsychol 1991, 5:125-142.
28. Delis D, Kaplan E, Kramer J. Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System 2001, San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
29. Clare L, Linden DEJ, Woods RT, Whitaker R, Evans SJ, Parkinson C, van Paasschen J, Nelis SM, Hoare Z, Yuen KSL, Rugg MD. Goal-oriented cognitive rehabilitation for people with early-stage Alzheimer disease: a single-blind randomized controlled trial of clinical efficacy. Am J Geriat Psychiat 2010, 18:928-939.
30. McEwen S, Polatajko HJ, Huijbregts MPJ, Ryan JD. Exploring a cognitive-based treatment approach to improve motor-based skill performance in chronic stroke: results of three single-case experiments. Brain Inj 2009, 23:1041-1053. 10.3109/02699050903421107, 19909052.
31. Sewell L, Singh SJ, Williams JEA, Collier R, Morgan MDL. Can individualized rehabilitation improve functional independence in elderly patients with COPD?. Chest 2005, 128:1194-1200. 10.1378/chest.128.3.1194, 16162706.
32. Nunnally J. Psychometric Theory 1978, New York: McGraw-Hill.
33. Bottari C, Dassa C, Rainville CM, Dutil E. The IADL Profile: development, content validity, intra- and interrater agreement. Can J Occup Ther 2010, 77:90-100. 10.2182/cjot.2010.77.2.5, 20464894.
34. Martini R. Verbal Self-guidance as an Approach to the Intervention of Children with Developmental Coordination Disorder: A Systematic Replication Study 1994, Master's thesis: University of Western Ontario, School of Occupational Therapy.
35. Roth RM, Peter KI, Gioia GA. Behaviour Rating Inventory of Executive Function - Adult Version 2005, Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources Inc.
36. Malec J, Lezak M. Manual for the mayo-Portland adaptability inventory (MPAI-4) http://tbims.org/combi/mpai/manual.pdf.
37. Mayer R. Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction. Am Psychol 2004, 59:14-19.
38. Trombly C, Radomski M, Trexel C, Burnet-Smith S. Occupational therapy and achievement of self-identified goals by adults with acquired brain injury: phase II. Am J Occup Ther 2002, 56:489-498. 10.5014/ajot.56.5.489, 12269503.
39. Gillen G. Cognitive and Perceptual Rehabilitation: Optimizing Function 2009, St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
40. Hart T, Fann JR, Novack TA. The dilemma of the control condition in experience-based cognitive and behavioural treatment research. Neuropsych Rehabil 2008, 18:1-21.
41. Zwarenstein M, Treweek S. What kind of randomized trials do we need?. Can Med Assoc J 2009, 180:998-1000.