The IADL profile: Development, content validity, intra- and interrater agreement

Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy

Volumn 77, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 90-100

  Bottari, Carolina L ^a   Dassa, Clément ^b   Rainville, Constant M ^c,d   Dutil, Élisabeth ^b  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^c CENTRE DE RECHERCHE   (Canada)

^d CENTRE FOR INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH IN REHABILITATION OF GREATER MONTREAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Activities of daily living; Brain injuries; Cognition; Psychometrics

Indexed keywords

ACUTE DISEASE; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN INJURY; COGNITION; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; EVALUATION; GLASGOW COMA SCALE; HUMAN; MIDDLE AGED; PILOT STUDY; PSYCHOMETRY; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; VALIDATION STUDY; VIDEORECORDING;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ACUTE DISEASE; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BRAIN INJURIES; COGNITION; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; GLASGOW COMA SCALE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PILOT PROJECTS; PSYCHOMETRICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; VALIDATION STUDIES AS TOPIC; VIDEO RECORDING;

EID: 77951293522     PISSN: 00084174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2182/cjot.2010.77.2.5     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Arnadottir, G. (1990). The brain and behavior: Assessing cortical dysfunction through activities of daily living. St. Louis, MO: The C.V. Mosby Company.
2. Ashley, M. J., Persel, C. S., & Clark, M. C. (2001). Validation of an independent living scale for post-acute rehabilitation applications. Brain Injury, 15, 435-442. doi: 10.1080/02699050010005896
3. Baum, C. M., Connor, L. T., Morrison, T., Hahn, M., Dromerick, A. W., & Edwards, D. F. (2008). Reliability, validity, and clinical utility of the Executive Function Performance Test: A measure of executive function in a sample of people with stroke. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62, 446-455.
4. Benson, J., & Clark, F. (1982). A guide for instrument development and validation. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 36, 789-799.
5. Bottari, C. (2001). Perception of experts on criteria for the assessment of the "dysexecutive syndrome" in everyday activities. Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec.
6. Bottari, C., Dassa, C., Rainville, C., & Dutil, E. (2009a). The criterion- related validity of the IADL Profile with measures of executive functions, indices of trauma severity and sociodemographic characteristics. Brain Injury, 23, 322-335. doi: 10.1080/02699050902788436
7. Bottari, C., Dassa, C., Rainville, C., & Dutil, E. (2009b). The factorial validity and internal consistency of the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Profile in individuals with a traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 19, 177-207. doi: 10.1080/09602010802188435
8. Bottari, C., Dassa, C., Rainville, C., & Dutil, E. (In press). A generalizability study of the IADL Profile. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.
9. Bottari, C., & Dutil, E. (2000). Vers une meilleure compréhension des besoins de la personne dans les activités de la vie quotidienne (AVQ): Une analyse critique d'instruments de mesure. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Congress of the Quebec Association of Occupational Therapists, Trois-Rivières, Québec, Quebec.
10. Bottari, C., Dutil, E., Dassa, C., & Rainville, C. (2006). Choosing the most appropriate environment to evaluate independence in everyday activities: Home or clinic? Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 53, 98-106. doi: 10.1111/j.1440- 1630.2006.00547.x
11. Burgess, P. W. (2000). Strategy application disorder: The role of the frontal lobes in human multitasking. Psychological Research, 63, 279-288.
12. Burgess, P. W., Alderman, N., Forbes, C., Costello, A., Coates, L., M-A., Dawson, D. R., ⋯ Channon, S. (2006). The case for the development and use of "ecologically valid" measures of executive function in experimental and clinical neuropsychology. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 12, 194-209.
13. Burgess, P. W., & Robertson, I. H. (2002). Principles of the rehabilitation of frontal lobe function. In D. T. Stuss & R. T. Knight (Eds.), Principles of frontal lobe function (pp. 557-572). New York: Oxford University Press.
14. Chevignard, M., Pillon, B., Pradat-Diehl, P., Taillefer, C., Rousseau, S., Le Bras, C., & Dubois, B. (2000). An ecological approach to planning dysfunction: Script execution. Cortex, 36, 649-669.
15. Cicchetti, D. V. (1988). When diagnostic agreement is high, but reliability is low: Some paradoxes occurring in joint independent neuropsychology assessment. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 10, 605-622.
16. Crépeau, F., Scherzer, B. P., Belleville, S., & Desmarais, G. (1997). A qualitative analysis of central executive disorders in a real-life work situation. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 7, 147-165. doi: 10.1080/096020197390239
17. Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Group/Thomas Learning.
18. Dawson, D. R., & Chipman, M. (1995). The disablement experienced by traumatically brain-injured adults living in the community. Brain Injury, 9, 339-353. doi: 10.3109/02699059509005774
19. Donner, A., & Eliasziw, M. (1992). A goodness-of-fit approach to inference procedures for the kappa statistic: confidence interval construction, significance-testing and sample size estimation. Statistics in Medicine, 11, 1511-1519.
20. Dutil, E., Bottari, C., Vanier, M., & Gaudreault, C. (2005). ADL Profile: Description of the instrument (H. Scott & C. Bottari, Trans. 4th ed., Vol. 1). Montreal: Les Éditions Émersion.
21. Dutil, E., Forget, A., Vanier, M., & Gaudreault, C. (1990). Development of the ADL Profile: An evaluation for adults with severe head injury. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 7, 7-22. doi: 10.1300/J003v07n01-03
22. Dutil, E., Forget, A., Vanier, M., Lambert, J., Gaudreault, C., Auger, C., & Labelle, J. (1996). Le Profil des AVQ: Un outil d'évaluation pour les personnes ayant subi un traumatisme cranio-encéphalique. Revue Québécoise d'Érgothérapie, 5, 112-120.
23. Dutil, E., Vanier, M., & Lambert, J. (1995). Changements dans les habitudes de vie suite à un traumatisme crânien. Rencontre en médecine physique et réadaptation, no.1. Expériences en ergothérapie, Huitième série, 52-56.
24. Fisher, A. G. (2003). Assessment of Motor and Process skills. Volume 1: Development, standardization and administration manual (5th ed.). Fort Collins, Colorado: Three Star Press, Inc.
25. Godbout, L., Grenier, M. C., Braun, C. M., & Gagnon, S. (2005). Cognitive structure of executive deficits in patients with frontal lesions performing activities of daily living. Brain Injury, 19, 337-348. doi: 10.1080/02699050400005093 (Pubitemid 40796422)
26. Goel, V., Grafman, J., Tajik, J., Gana, S., & Danto, D. (1997). A study of the performance of patients with frontal lobe lesions in a financial planning task. Brain, 120, 1805-1822. doi: 10.1093/ brain/120.10.1805
27. Klein, S., Barlow, I., & Hollis, V. (2008). Evaluating ADL measures from an occupational therapy perspective. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 75, 69-81.
28. Kozlowski O., Pollez B., Thevenon A., Dhellemmes P., & Rousseaux M. (2002). Devenir et qualité de vie à trois ans dans une cohorte de patients traumatisés crâniens graves. Annales de Réadaptation et de Médecine Physique, 45, 466-473
29. Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159-174.
30. Lezak, M. D. (1989). Assessment of psychosocial dysfunctions resulting from head trauma. In M. D. Lezak (Ed.), Assessment of the behavioural consequences of head trauma (pp. 113-143). New York: Alan R. Liss, Inc.
31. Lezak, M. D., Howieson, D. B., & Loring, D. W. (2004). Neuropsychological assessment (4th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
32. Luria, A. R. (1966). Higher cortical functions in man (B. Haigh, Trans., 2nd ed.). New York: Basic Books Inc.
33. Luria, A. R. (1973). The working brain: An introduction to neuropsychology. New York: Basic Books Inc.
34. Rabbitt, P. (1997). Introduction: Methodologies and models in the study of executive function. In P. Rabbitt (Ed.), Methodology offrontal and executive function (pp. 1-38). Hove, United Kingdom:Psychology Press.
35. Rainville, C., Passini, R., & Marchand, N. (2001). A multiple case study of wayfinding of the Alzheimer type: Decision making. Aging, Neuropsychology and Cognition, 8, 54-71.
36. Royall, D. R., Lauterbach, E. C., Kaufer, D., Malloy, P., Coburn, K. L., & Black, K. J. (2007). The cognitive correlates of functional status: A review from the Committee on Research of the American Neuropsychiatric Association. Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 19, 249-265.
37. Schwartz, M. F., Mayer, N. H., FitzpatrickDeSalme, E. J., & Montgomery, M. W. (1993). Cognitive theory and the study of everyday action disorders after brain damage. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 8(1), 59-72.
38. Schwartz, M. F., Segal, M., Veramonti, T., Feraro, M., & Buxbaum, L. J. (2002). The Naturalistic Action Test: A standardised assessment for everyday action impairment. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 12, 311-339. doi: 10.1080/09602010244000084 (Pubitemid 35006179)
39. Shallice, T., & Burgess, P. W. (1991). Deficits in strategy application following frontal lobe damage in man. Brain, 114, 727-741. doi: 10.1093/brain/114.2.727
40. Teasdale, G., & Jennett, B. (1974). Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness: A practical scale. Lancet, 2, 81-84.