The relation between science student teachers' misconceptions about solution, dissolution, diffusion and their attitudes toward science with their achievement;Fen öǧretmen adaylarinin çözelti, çözünme ve difüzyon konusundaki kavram yanilgilari ve fen tutumlari ile başarilari arasindaki ilişki

Egitim ve Bilim

Volumn 34, Issue 154, 2009, Pages 26-36

  Akgün, Abuzer ^a  

^a ADIYAMAN UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Dissolution; Logical thinking; Misconceptions; Science education; Solubility

Indexed keywords

EID: 84884297492     PISSN: 13001337     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Abraham, M. R., Grzybowski, E. B., Renner, J.W., & Marek, E. A. (1992). Understandings and Misunderstandings of Eight Graders of Five Chemistry Concepts Found in Textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(2), 105-120.
2. Abraham, M. R., Williamson, V. M., & Westbrook, S. L. (1994). A Cross-age Study of the Understanding of Five Concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(2), 147-165.
3. Akgün, A. & Gönen, S. (2004). Çözünme ve Fiziksel Degisim Iliskisi Konusundaki Kavram Yanilgilarinin Belirlenmesi Giderilmesinde Çalisma Yapraklarinin Önemi. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 3(10), 22-37.
4. Ashton, P. T., & Webb, R. B. (1986). Making a Difference: Teachers' Sense of Efficacy and Student Achievement. New York: Longman.
5. Blanco, A., Prieto, T., & Rodriguez, A. (1989). The Ideas of 11 to 14-year-old Students About the Nature Solutions. International Journal of Science Education, 11(4), 451-463.
6. Blanco, A. & Prieto T. (1997). Pupils' Views on How Stirring and Temprature Affect the Dissolution of a Solid in a Liquid: A Cross-age Study (12 to 18). International Journal of Science Education, 19(3), 303-315.
7. Blanco, A., & Prieto T. (1997). Pupils' Views on How Stirring and Temprature Affect The Dissolution of a Solid in a Liquid: A Cross-age Study (12 to 18). International Journal of Science Education, 19, (3), 303-315.
8. Cosgrove, M., & Osborne, R. (1981). Physical Change (Working Paper No.26). Learning in Science Project, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.
9. Çalik, M., & Ayas, A.(2005a). A Comparison of Level of Understanding of Grade 8 Students and Science Student Teachers Related to Selected Chemistry Concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(6), 638-667.
10. Çalik, M. (2005b). A Cross-Age Study of Different Perspectives in Solution Chemistry from Junior to Senior High School. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3, 671-696.
11. Çalik, M., & Ayas, A. (2005c). A Cross-Age Study on the Understanding of Chemical Solution and Their Components. International Education Journal, 6(1), 30-41.
12. Driver, R., & Easley, J. (1978). Pupils and Paradigms: A Review of Literature Related to Concept Development in Adolescent Science Students, Studies in Science Education, 5, 61-84.
13. Driver, R., & Russell, T. (1982). "An Investigation of The Ideas of Heat Temperature and Change of State of Children Aged Between 8 and 14 Years". Unpublished paper, University of Leeds.
14. Ebenezer, J. V., & Erickson, G. L. (1996). Chemistry Students' Conceptions of Solubility: APhenomenography. Science Education. 80(2), 181-201.
15. Ebenezer, J. V., & Fraser, M.D. (2001). "First Year Chemical Engineering Students' Conception of Energy in Solution Processes: Phenomenographic Categories for Common Knowledge Construction, Science Education, 85, 509-535.
16. Ebenezer, J. V. (2001). A Hypermedia Environment to Explore and Negotiate Students' Conceptions: Animation of the Solution Process of Table Salt. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 10(1), 73-92.
17. Ebenezer, J. V., & Gaskell, P. J. (1995). Relational Conceptual Change in Solution Chemistry. Science Education, 79(1), 1-17.
18. Eliam, B. (2002). Strata of Comprehending Ecology: Looking Through the Prism of Feeding Relations. Science Education, 86, 1-27.
19. Eilam, B. (2004).Drops of water and of Soap Solution: Students' Constraining Models of the Nature of Matter. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 970-993.
20. Geban, Ö., Ertepinar, H., Yilmaz, G., Altan, A. & Sahbaz, F. (1994). Bilgisayar Destekli Egitimin Ögrencilerin Fen Bilgisi Basarilarina ve Fen Bilgisi Ilgilerine Etkisi. I. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri Egitimi Sempozyumu Bildirileri, 15-17 Eylül 1994, Buca Egitim Fakültesi, Izmir.
21. Garnett, P. I., & Treagust, D. F. (1990). Implications of Research Of Students' Understanding Of Electrochemistry For Improving Science Curricula And Classroom Practice. Internatjonal Journal of Science Education, 12(12), 147-156.
22. Gilbert, J. K., Osborne, R.J., & Fensham, P.J. (1982). Children's Science and Its Consequences for Teaching. Science Education, 66, 623-633.
23. Gennaro, E.D. (1981). Assessing Junior High Students' Understanding of Density and Solubility. School Science and Mathematics, 81, 399-404.
24. Griffith, A. K. (1994). A Critical Analysis and Synthesis of Research on Chemistry Misconceptions. In H.J. Schmidt, Proceedings of the 1994 International Symposium on Problem Solving and Misconceptions in Chemistry and Physics. Dortmund, Germany: ICASE (The International Council of Associations for Science Education) Publications, 70-99.
25. Hewson, M. G., &Hewson, P.W. (1983). Effect of Instruction Using Students' Prior Knowledge and Conceptual Change Strategies on Science Learning, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(8), 731-743.
26. Holding, Brian (1987). "Investigation of School Children's Understandings of the Process of Dissolving with Special Reference to the Conservation of Matter and the Development of Atomistic Ideas". University of Leeds, (Unpublished Ph. D. Thesis), Leeds, UK.
27. Kabapinar, F., Leach, J., & Scott, P. (2004).The Design and Evaluation of a Teaching-Learning Sequence Addressing the Solubility Concept with Turkish Secondary School Students. International Journal of Science Education, 26(5), 635-652.
28. Kaartinen, S., & Kumpulainen, K. (2002). Collaborative Inquiry and the Construction of Explanations in the Learning of Science. Learning and Instruction, 12, 189-212.
29. Koballa, T.R., & Crawley, R. E. (1985). The Influence of Attitude on Science Teaching and Learning, School Science and Mathematics, 85, 222-231.
30. Leach, J., & Scott, P. (2003). Individual and Sociocultural Views of Learning in Science Education. Science and Education, 12, 91-113.
31. Lee, O., Eichinger, D.C., Anderson, C.W., Berkheimer, G.D., & Blakeslee, T. D. (1993). Changing Middle School Students' Conceptions of Matter and Molecules. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(3), 249-270.
32. Liu, X., Ebenezer, J., & Fraser, D. M. (2002). Structural Characteristics of University Engineering Students' Conceptions of Energy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(5), 423-441.
33. Novick, S., & J. Nussbaum. (1978). Junior High School Pupils' Understanding of the Particulate Nature of Matter: An Interview Study, 62(3), 273-281.
34. Novick, S., & J. Nussbaum. (1981). Pupils' Understanding of the Particulate Nature of Matter: A Cross-age Study, Science Education 65(2), 187-196.
35. Novak, J. D. (1977). "A Theory of Education". Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
36. Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1974). The Child's Construction of Quantities. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
37. Pinarbasi, T., & Canpolat, N. (2003). Students' Understanding of Solution Chemistry Concepts, Journal of Chemical Education, 80(11), 1328-1332.
38. Prieto, T., Blanco, A., & Rodriguez, A.(1989). The Ideas of 11 to 14 Year-Old Students about the Nature of Solutions. International Journal of Science Education, 11(4), 451-463.
39. Prieto, J., Takei, F., Gendelman, R. Christenson, B. Biberfeld, P., & Patarroyo, M.(1989). "MALA-2, Mouse Homologue of Human Adhesion Molecule ICAM-1 (CD54)". Europ. J. Immun. 19: 1551-1557, 1989.
40. Saklofske, D. H., Michayluk, C. O., & Randhawa, B. S. (1988). Teacher Efficacy and Teaching Behaviors. Psychological Social Behavior aiid Personality, 5, 465-472.
41. Stevens, C., & Wenner, G. (1996). Elementary Preservice Teachers' Knowledge and Beliefs Regarding Science and Mathematics. School Science and Mathematics, 96, 2-9.
42. Stanovich, K. E. (1988). Explaining the Differences between the Dyslexicsand the Garden Variety poor Reader: The phonological core variable- difference model. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21(10), 590-604.
43. Stavy, R. (1990). Children's Conception of Changes in the States of Matter: From Liquid (or solid) to Gas. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(3), 247-266.
44. Tobin, K. G., & Capie, W. (1981). Development and Validation of a Group Test of Logical Thinking, Educational and Phychological Measurement, 41, 413-23.
45. Taber, K. S. (2000). Finding the Optimum Level of Simplification: The Case of Teaching About Heat and Temperature, Physics Education, 35(5), 320-325.
46. Taylor, N., & Coll, R. (1997). The Use of Analogy in the Teaching of Solubility to Pre-service Primary Teachers, Australian Science Teachers' Journal, 43(4), 58-64.
47. Wandersee, H., Mintzes, J. J., & Novak, J. D. (1994). Research on Alternative Conceptions in Science. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning". New York: Macmillan.
48. Wandersee, J. H., Mintzes, J. J., & Novak, J. D. (1994). Learning: Alternative Conceptions. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook on Research in Science Teaching (pp. 177-210). New York: Macmillan.
49. Wenner, G. J. (1993). Relationship between Science Knowledge Levels and Beliefs toward Science Instruction Held by Preservice Elementary Teachers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2, 461- 468.
50. Willcocks, L., & Griffiths, C. (1994) Predicting Risk of Failure in Large-scale Information Technology Projects. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 47, 205-228.