Articulation effects in melody recognition memory

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 66, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 1774-1792

  Wee Hun Lim, Stephen ^a   Goh, Winston D ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Articulation format effects; Global matching advantage; Melody recognition memory

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; MALE; MUSIC; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RECOGNITION; STUDENT; UNIVERSITY;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MUSIC; PATTERN RECOGNITION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; PITCH PERCEPTION; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); STUDENTS; UNIVERSITIES;

EID: 84884285614     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2013.766758     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Baddeley, A. D. 1998. Human memory: Theory and practice (Rev. ed.), Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
2. Berger, K. W. 1964. Some factors in the recognition of timbre. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 36: 1888 - 1891. (doi:10.1121/1.1919287)
3. Church, B. and Schacter, D. L. 1994. Perceptual specificity of auditory priming: Memory for voice 0intonation and fundamental frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20: 521 - 533. (doi:10.1037/0278-7393.20.3.521)
4. Clark, S. E. and Gronlund, S. D. 1996. Global matching models of recognition memory: How the models match the data. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3: 37 - 60. (doi:10.3758/BF03210740)
5. Clark, M., Robertson, J. P. and Luce, D. 1964. A preliminary experiment on the perceptual basis for musical instrument families. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society, 12: 199 - 203.
6. Cleary, A. M. 2004. Orthography, phonology, and meaning: Word features that give rise to feelings of familiarity in recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin &Review, 11: 446 - 451. (doi:10.3758/BF03196593)
7. Dowling, W. J. 1972. Recognition of melodic transformations: Inversion, retrograde, and retrograde inversion. Perception & Psychophysics, 12: 417 - 421. (doi:10.3758/BF03205852)
8. Dowling, W. J. 1978. Scale and contour: Two components of a theory of memory for melodies. Psychological Review, 85: 341 - 354. (doi:10.1037/0033-295X.85.4.341)
9. Dowling, W. J. 1982. " Melodic information processing and its development ". In The psychology of music, Edited by: Deutsch, D. 413 - 429. New York: Academic Press.
10. Dowling, W. J. and Fujitani, D. S. 1971. Contour, interval, and pitch recognition in memory for melodies. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 49: S24 - S31. (doi:10.1121/1.1912382)
11. Edworthy, J. 1985. " Melodic contour and musical structure ". In Musical structure and cognition, Edited by: Howell, P., Cross, I. and West, R. 169 - 188. London, UK: Academic Press.
12. Finale [Software]. (2009). Eden Prairie, MN: MakeMusic, Inc.
13. Gillund, G. and Shiffrin, R. M. 1984. A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. Psychological Review, 91: 1 - 67. (doi:10.1037/0033-295X.91.1.1)
14. Goh, W. D. 2005. Talker variability and recognition memory: Instance-specific and voice-specific effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31: 40 - 53. (doi:10.1037/0278-7393.31.1.40)
15. Goldinger, S. D. 1996. Words and voices: Episodic traces in spoken word identification and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22: 1166 - 1183. (doi:10.1037/0278-7393.22.5.1166)
16. Goldinger, S. D. 1998. Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. Psychological Review, 105: 251 - 279. (doi:10.1037/0033-295X.105.2.251)
17. Grey, J. M. and Moorer, J. A. 1977. Perceptual evaluations of synthesized musical instrument tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 62: 454 - 462. (doi:10.1121/1.381508)
18. Halpern, A. R. and Müllensiefen, D. 2008. Effects of timbre and tempo change on memory for music. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61: 1371 - 1384. (doi:10.1080/17470210701508038)
19. Hart, J. T. 1965. Memory and the feeling-of-knowing experience. Journal of Educational Psychology, 56: 208 - 216. (doi:10.1037/h0022263)
20. Hintzman, D. L. 1988. Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple trace memory model. Psychological Review, 95: 528 - 551. (doi:10.1037/0033-295X.95.4.528)
21. Koriat, A. 2000. The feeling of knowing: Some metatheoretical implications for consciousness and control. Consciousness and Cognition, 9: 149 - 171. (doi:10.1006/ccog.2000.0433)
22. Koriat, A. and Levy-Sadot, R. 1999. " Processes underlying metacognitive judgments: Information-based and experience-based monitoring of one's own knowledge ". In Dual-process theories in social psychology, Edited by: Chaiken, S. and Trope, Y. 483 - 502. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
23. Koriat, A. and Levy-Sadot, R. 2001. The combined contributions of the cue-familiarity and accessibility heuristics to feelings of knowing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27: 34 - 53. (doi:10.1037/0278-7393.27.1.34)
24. Kruskal, J. B. and Wish, M. 1978. Multidimensional scaling, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
25. LaBerge, D. 1981. " Perceptual and motor schemas in the performance of music ". In In J. A. Mason (Ed.) Documentary report of the Ann Arbor Symposium, 68 - 76. Reston, VA: Music Educators National Conference.
26. Large, E. W., Palmer, C. and Pollack, J. B. 1995. Reduced memory representations for music. Cognitive Science, 19: 53 - 96. (doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1901_2)
27. Lim, S. W. H. and Goh, W. D. 2012. Variability and recognition memory: Are there analogous indexical effects in music and speech?. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 24: 602 - 616. (doi:10.1080/20445911.2012.674029)
28. Luce, P. A. and Lyons, E. A. 1998. Specificity of memory representations for spoken words. Memory and Cognition, 26: 708 - 715. (doi:10.3758/BF03211391)
29. McMullen, E. and Saffran, J. R. 2004. Music and language: A developmental comparison. Music Perception, 21: 289 - 311. (doi:10.1525/mp.2004.21.3.289)
30. Navon, D. 1977. Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9: 353 - 383. (doi:10.1016/0010-0285(77)90012-3)
31. Neath, I. and Surprenant, A. M. 2003. Human memory: An introduction to research, data, and theory, Toronto, Canada: Wadsworth.
32. Nygaard, L. C. and Pisoni, D. B. 1998. Talker-specific learning in speech perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 60: 355 - 376. (doi:10.3758/BF03206860)
33. Nygaard, L. C., Sommers, M. S. and Pisoni, D. B. 1994. Speech perception as a talker-contingent process. Psychological Science, 5: 42 - 46. (doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00612.x)
34. Patel, A. D. 2003. Language, music, syntax and the brain. Nature Neuroscience, 6: 674 - 681. (doi:10.1038/nn1082)
35. Peretz, I. 1990. Processing of local and global musical information by unilateral brain-damaged patients. Brain, 113: 1185 - 1205. (doi:10.1093/brain/113.4.1185)
36. Peretz, I., Gaudreau, D. and Bonnel, A. 1998. Exposure effects on music preference and recognition. Memory & Cognition, 26: 884 - 902. (doi:10.3758/BF03201171)
37. Pick, A. D. 1979. " Listening to melodies: Perceiving events ". In Perception and its development: A tribute to Eleanor J. Gibson, Edited by: Pick, A. D. 145 - 165. Hillsdale, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum Associates.
38. Pilotti, M., Bergman, E. T., Gallo, D. A., Sommers, M. and Roediger, H. L. III. 2000. Direct comparison of auditory implicit memory tests. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7: 347 - 353. (doi:10.3758/BF03212992)
39. Pisoni, D. B. 1997. " Some thoughts on "normalization" in speech perception ". In Talker variability in speech processing, Edited by: Johnson, K. and Mullennix, J. W. 9 - 32. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
40. Pisoni, D. B. and Lively, S. E. 1995. " Variability and invariance in speech perception: A new look at some old problems in perceptual learning ". In Speech perception and linguistic experience, Edited by: Strange, W. 433 - 459. Baltimore, MD: York Press.
41. Raffman, D. 1993. Language, music, and mind, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
42. Saldanha, E. L. and Corso, J. F. 1964. Timbre cues and the identification of musical instruments. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 36: 2021 - 2026. (doi:10.1121/1.1919317)
43. Schneider, W., Eschman, A. and Zuccolott, A. 2002. E-Prime user's guide, Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools.
44. Sheffert, S. M. 1998. Contributions of surface and conceptual information to recognition memory. Perception & Psychophysics, 60: 1141 - 1152. (doi:10.3758/BF03206164)
45. Trainor, L. J., Wu, L. and Tsang, C. D. 2004. Long-term memory for music: Infants remember tempo and timbre. Developmental Science, 7: 289 - 296. (doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2004.00348.x)
46. Tulving, E. and Thompson, D. M. 1973. Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80: 352 - 373. (doi:10.1037/h0020071)
47. Wedin, L. and Goude, G. 1972. Dimension analysis of the perception of instrumental timbre. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 13: 228 - 240. (doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.1972.tb00071.x)