Variability and recognition memory: Are there analogous indexical effects in music and speech?

Journal of Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 24, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 602-616

  Lim, Stephen Wee Hun ^a   Goh, Winston D ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Melody recognition memory; Spoken word recognition; Talker variability effects; Timbre repetition effects

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EPISODIC MEMORY; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; LONG TERM MEMORY; MEMORY CONSOLIDATION; MUSIC; PERCEPTION; PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECOGNITION; RELIABILITY; SPEECH; VOICE; ADULT; ASSOCIATION; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INSTRUMENT; MEDICAL STUDENT; MENTAL PERFORMANCE; NORMAL HUMAN; PATTERN RECOGNITION; SPEECH PERCEPTION; SURFACE PROPERTY;

EID: 84864061154     PISSN: 20445911     EISSN: 2044592X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/20445911.2012.674029     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Berger, K. W. 1964. Some factors in the recognition of timbre. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 36: 1888-1891.
2. Church, B., and, Schacter, D. L. 1994. Perceptual specificity of auditory priming: Memory for voice intonation and fundamental frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20: 521-533.
3. Clark, M., Robertson, J. P., and, Luce, D. 1964. A preliminary experiment on the perceptual basis for musical instrument families. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society, 12: 199-203.
4. Clark, S. E., and, Gronlund, S. D. 1996. Global matching models of recognition memory: How the models match the data. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 3: 37-60.
5. Cleary, A. M. 2004. Orthography, phonology, and meaning: Word features that give rise to feelings of familiarity in recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11: 446-451.
6. Crowder, R. G. 1989. Imagery for musical timbre. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15: 472-478.
7. Gillund, G., and, Shiffrin, R. M. 1984. A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. Psychological Review, 91: 1-67.
8. Goh, W. D. 2005. Talker variability and recognition memory: Instance-specific and voice-specific effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31: 40-53.
9. Goldinger, S. D. 1996. Words and voices: Episodic traces in spoken word identification and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22: 1166-1183.
10. Goldinger, S. D. 1998. Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. Psychological Review, 105: 251-279.
11. Grey, J. M., and, Moorer, J. A. 1977. Perceptual evaluations of synthesized musical instrument tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 62: 454-462.
12. Hintzman, D. L. 1988. Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple trace memory model. Psychological Review, 95: 528-551.
13. Kostic, B., and, Cleary, A. M. 2009. Song recognition without identification: When people cannot name that tune but can recognize it as familiar. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138: 146-159.
14. Krumhansl, C. L. 1990. Cognitive foundations of musical pitch, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
15. Kruskal, J. B., and, Wish, M. 1978. Multidimensional scaling, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
16. Large, E. W., Palmer, C., and, Pollack, J. B. 1995. Reduced memory representations for music. Cognitive Science, 19: 53-96.
17. Levitin, D. J. 1994. Absolute memory for musical pitch: Evidence from the production of learned melodies. Perception and Psychophysics, 56: 414-423.
18. Levitin, D. J., and, Cook, P. R. 1996. Memory for musical tempo: Additional evidence that auditory memory is absolute. Perception and Psychophysics, 58: 927-935.
19. Lively, S. E. 1994. Preserving the perceptual record: Retention of talker-specific information in long-term memory. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN.
20. Luce, P. A., and, Lyons, E. A. 1998. Specificity of memory representations for spoken words. Memory and Cognition, 26: 708-715.
21. Magnuson, J. S., and, Nusbaum, H. C. 2007. Acoustic differences, listener expectations, and the perceptual accommodation of talker variability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33: 391-409.
22. Mandler, G. 1980. Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. Psychological Review, 87: 252-271.
23. McClelland, J. L., and, Rumelhart, D. E. 1985. Distributed memory and the representation of general and specific information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114: 159-188.
24. McMullen, E., and, Saffran, J. R. 2004. Music and language: A developmental comparison. Music Perception, 21: 289-311.
25. Nygaard, L. C., and, Pisoni, D. B. 1998. Talker-specific learning in speech perception. Perception and Psychophysics, 60: 355-376.
26. Nygaard, L. C., Sommers, M. S., and, Pisoni, D. B. 1994. Speech perception as a talker-contingent process. Psychological Science, 5: 42-46.
27. Patel, A. D. 2003. Language, music, syntax and the brain. Nature Neuroscience, 6: 674-681.
28. Peretz, I., Gaudreau, D., and, Bonnel, A. 1998. Exposure effects on music preference and recognition. Memory and Cognition, 26: 884-902.
29. Pilotti, M., Bergman, E. T., Gallo, D. A., Sommers, M., &, Roediger, H. L. III. 2000. Direct comparison of auditory implicit memory tests. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 7, 347-353.
30. Pisoni, D. B. 1997. Some thoughts on normalization in speech perception. In Talker variability in speech processing, Edited by: Johnson, K. and Mullennix, J. W. 9-32. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
31. Raaijmakers, J. G. W., and, Shiffrin, R. M. 1981. Search of associative memory. Psychological Review, 88: 93-134.
32. Radvansky, G., Fleming, K., and, Simmons, J. 1995. Timbre reliance in nonmusicians' and musicians' memory for melodies. Music Perception, 13: 127-140.
33. Raffman, D. 1993. Language, music, and mind, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34. Robinson, K., and, Patterson, R. D. 1995a. The duration required to identify an instrument, the octave, or the pitch chroma of a musical note. Music Perception, 13: 1-15.
35. Robinson, K., and, Patterson, R. D. 1995b. The stimulus duration required to identify vowels, their octave, and their pitch chroma. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 98: 1858-1865.
36. Saldanha, E. L., and, Corso, J. F. 1964. Timbre cues and the identification of musical instruments. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 36: 2021-2026.
37. Schellenberg, E. G., Iverson, P., and, McKinnon, M. C. 1999. Name that tune: Identifying popular recordings from brief excerpts. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 6: 641-646.
38. Schellenberg, E. G., and, Trehub, S. E. 2003. Good pitch memory is widespread. Psychological Science, 14: 262-266.
39. Schneider, W., Eschman, A., and, Zuccolott, A. 2002. E-prime user's guide, Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tool Inc.
40. Sheffert, S. M. 1998. Contributions of surface and conceptual information to recognition memory. Perception and Psychophysics, 60: 1141-1152.
41. Shiffrin, R. M., and, Steyvers, M. 1997. A model for recognition memory: REMretrieving effectively from memory. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 4: 145-166.
42. Trainor, L. J., Wu, L., and, Tsang, C. D. 2004. Long-term memory for music: Infants remember tempo and timbre. Developmental Science, 7: 289-296.
43. Tulving, E., and, Thompson, D. M. 1973. Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80: 352-373.
44. Warren, R. M., Gardner, D. A., Brubaker, B. S., and, Bashford, J. A. 1991. Melodic and nonmelodic sequences of tones: Effects of duration on perception. Music Perception, 8: 277-290.
45. Wedin, L., and, Goude, G. 1972. Dimension analysis of the perception of instrumental timbre. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 13: 228-240.
46. Wolpert, R. 1990. Recognition of melody, harmonic accompaniment, and instrumentation: Musicians vs. nonmusicians. Music Perception, 8: 95-106.
47. Yonelinas, A. P. 2002. The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory and Language, 46: 441-517.