More equal than others? A comparative analysis of state and non-state perceptions of interest representation and decision-making in REDD+ negotiations

Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 214-230

  Cadman, Tim ^a   Maraseni, Tek ^b  

^a GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

decision making; global environmental governance; interest representation; legitimacy; quality

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE CHANGE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DECISION MAKING; DEFORESTATION; EMISSION CONTROL; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; FOREST MANAGEMENT; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; STAKEHOLDER; UNITED NATIONS;

NEPAL;

EID: 84884280323     PISSN: 13511610     EISSN: 14698412     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13511610.2013.771880     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Andonova, B., Betsill, M. and Bulkeley, H. 2009. Transnational Climate Governance. Global Environmental Politics, 9 (2): 52 - 73. doi: 10.1162/glep.2009.9.2.52
2. Angelsen, A., S. Brown, C. Loisel, L. Peskett, C. Streck, and D. Zarin, 2009. Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD): An Options Assessment Report. Washington, DC: Meridian Institute.
3. Biermann, F., Betsill, M. M., Gupta, J., Kanie, N., Lebel, L., Liverman, D., Schroeder, H. and Siebenhüner, B. 2009. Earth System Governance: People, Places and the Planet Science and implementation plan of the Earth System Governance project. Earth System Governance Report 1, IHDP Report 20. Bonn: IHDP - The Earth System Governance Project.
4. Biermann, F., and A. Gupta. 2011. " Accountability and Legitimacy in Earth System Governance: A Research Framework." Ecological Economics 70 (Sep.): 1856 - 1864 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.04.008.
5. Bingham, L., R. O'Leary, and T. Nabatchi. 2005. " Legal Frameworks for the New Governance: Processes for Citizen Participation in the Work of Government." National Civic Review. Spring: 54 - 61 doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1542-7811.
6. Bulkeley, H. 2010. Climate Policy and Governance: An Editorial Essay. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 1 (3): 311 - 313. doi: 10.1002/wcc.1
7. Burns, A. and Burns, R. 2008. Basic Marketing Research, 2nd ed, New Jersey: Pearson Education.
8. Cadman, T. 2011. Quality and Legitimacy of Global Governance: Case Lessons from Forestry, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
9. Cadman, T. and Maraseni, T. 2011. The Governance of Climate Change: Evaluating the Governance Quality and Legitimacy of the United Nations' REDD-plus Programme. International Journal of Climate Change: Impacts and Responses, 2 (3): 103 - 123.
10. Cadman, T. and Maraseni, T. 2012. The Governance of REDD+: An Institutional Analysis in the Asia Pacific Region and Beyond. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 55 (4): 617 - 635. doi: 10.1080/09640568.2011.619851
11. Cadman, T., T. Maraseni, and P. Blazey. 2012. " Perspectives on the Quality of Global Environmental Governance: An Evaluation of NGO Participation in Global Climate Negotiations in the Asia Pacific and Beyond." Third Sector Review, 18 (1): 145 - 169.
12. Carbon Positive. 2010. Glossary. Accessed October 10, 2010. http://www.carbonpositive.net/viewarticle.aspx?articleID=44
13. Cashore, B., Auld, G. and Newsom, D. 2004. Governing Through Markets: Forest Certification and the Emergence of Non-State Authority, New Haven: Yale University Press.
14. Cerbu, G., Swallow, B. and Thompson, D. 2011. Locating REDD: A Global Survey and Analysis of REDD Readiness and Demonstration Activities. Environmental Science and Policy, 14 (2): 168 - 180. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2010.09.007
15. CIFOR (Centre for International Tropical Forestry). n. d Simply REDD: CIFOR's Guide to Forests, Climate Change and REDD. Bogor: CIFOR. Accessed October 1, 2010. http://www.cifor.cgiar.org/publications/pdf_files/MediaGuide_REDD.pdf
16. Dawes, J. 2008. Do Data Characteristics Change According to the Number of Scale Points Used? An Experiment Using 5-Point, 7-Point and 10-Point Scales. International Journal of Market Research, 50 (1): 61 - 77.
17. Department of Forests. 2012. Community Forestry User Group Database Record, Community Forest Division. Kathmandu: Department of Forests (DoF).
18. Dryzek, D. 1990. The Politics of the Earth: Environmental Discourses, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
19. Dryzek, J. and Braithwaite, V. 2000. On the Prospects for Democratic Deliberation: Values Analysis Applied to Australian Politics. Political Psychology, 21 (2): 241 - 266. doi: 10.1111/0162-895X.00186
20. Down, T. 2002. " A Participatory Integrated Capacity Building Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainability - Mexico and New England Watershed Case Studies ". In International Experiences on Sustainability, Edited by: Filho, W. 179 - 205. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
21. Forest Carbon Portal. 2010. Multilateral Interim REDD+ Partnership Established in Oslo. Accessed October 2, 2010. http://www.forestcarbonportal.com/resource/interim-redd-partnership-established-oslo
22. Forsyth, T. 2009. " Multilevel, Multiactor Governance in REDD+: Participation, Integration and Coordination ". In Realising REDD+: National Strategy and Policy Options, Edited by: Angelsen, A. 113 - 122. Bogor: CIFOR.
23. Gaventa, J. 2002. Making Rights Real: Exploring Citizenship, Participation and Accountability. Journal of International Development Studies, 33 (2): 1 - 11.
24. Gulbrandsen, L. H. 2005. Explaining Different Approaches to Voluntary Standards: A study of Forest Certification Choices in Norway and Sweden. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 7 (1): 43 - 59. doi: 10.1080/15239080500251874
25. Held, D. 2003. " Executive to Cosmopolitan Multilateralism ". In Taming Globalization: Frontiers of Governance, Edited by: Held, D. and Koenig-Archibugi, M. 160 - 187. Cambridge: Polity Press.
26. IUCN (International Union for the Conservation of Nature) 2010. REDD+: Scope and Options for the Role of Forests in Climate Change Mitigation Strategies. Accessed May 21, 2010. http://cmsdata.iucn.org/downloads/redd_scope_english.pdf
27. Jänicke, M. 1992. Conditions for Environmental Policy Success: An International Comparison. The Environmentalist, 12: 47 - 58. doi: 10.1007/BF01267594
28. Juhola, S. and Westerhoff, L. 2011. Challenges of Adaptation to Climate Change Across Multiple Scales: A Case Study of Network Governance in Two European Countries. Environmental Science & Policy, 14 (3): 239 - 247. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2010.12.006
29. Keohane, R. 2003. " Global Governance and Democratic Accountability ". In Taming Globalization: Frontiers of Governance, Edited by: Held, D. and Koenig-Archibugi, M. 130 - 159. Cambridge: Polity Press.
30. Koenig-Archibugi, M. 2006. " Introduction: Institutional Diversity in Global Governance ". In New Modes of Governance in the Global System: Exploring Publicness, Delegation and Inclusiveness, Edited by: Koenig-Archibugi, M. and Zürn, M. 1 - 30. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
31. Kooiman, J. 2000. " Societal Governance: Levels, Models, and Orders of Social-political Interaction ". In Debating Governance: Authority, Steering and Democracy, Edited by: Pierre, J. 138 - 166. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32. Lafferty, W. and Meadowcroft, J. 1996. " Democracy and the Environment: Prospects for Greater Congruence ". In Democracy and the Environment: Problems and Prospects, Edited by: Lafferty, W. and Meadowcroft, J. 256 - 272. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
33. Lammerts van Bueren, E. and Blom, E. 1997. Hierarchical Framework for the Formulation of Sustainable Forest Management Standards, Leiden: The Tropenbos Foundation.
34. Lang, C. 2010. Norway-Indonesia Forest Deal: US$1 Billion Dollars worth of Continued Deforestation? REDD Monitor 28/05/2010. Accessed October 7, 2010. http://www.redd-monitor.org/2010/05/28/norway-indonesia-forest-deal-us1-billion-dollars-worth-of-continued-deforestation/
35. Mason, M. 1999. Environmental Democracy, New York, NY: St Martin's Press.
36. Ministry of Environment, Science and Technology. 2012. National Greenhouse Gas Inventory Report for Second National Communication to the Conference of the Parties of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Kathmandu: Ministry of Environment, Science and Technology.
37. Montreal Process. 1999. Criteria and Indicators for the Conservation and Sustainable Management of Temperate and Boreal Forest Ecosystems, 2nd ed. No location: Montreal Process.
38. Nanz, P. and Steffek, J. 2005. Assessing the Democratic Quality of Deliberation in International Governance: Criteria and Research Strategies. Acta politica, 40 (3): 368 - 383. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500118
39. Parker, C., Mitchell, A., Trivedi, M. and Mardas, N. 2009. The Little REDD+ Book, Oxford: Global Canopy Programme.
40. Pierre, J. and Peters, B. 2000. Governance, Politics and the State, London: Macmillan Press.
41. Rhodes, R. 1997. Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability, Buckingham: Open University Press.
42. Royal Norwegian Embassy in Jakarta. 2010. Norway-Indonesia REDD+ Partnership - Frequently Asked Questions. Accessed October 7, 2010. http://www.norway.or.id/Norway_in_Indonesia/Environment/-FAQ-Norway-Indonesia-REDD-Partnership-/
43. Simmons, R. and Birchall, J. 2005. A Joined-up Approach to User Participation in Public Services: Strengthening the 'Participation Chain'. Social Policy and Administration, 39 (3): 260 - 283. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9515.2005.00439.x
44. Stiglitz, J. 2006. " Globalization and Development ". In New Modes of Governance in the Global System: Exploring Publicness, Delegation and Inclusiveness, Edited by: Koenig-Archibugi, M. and Zürn, M. 47 - 67. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
45. Stoker, G. 2000. " Urban Political Science and the Challenge of Urban Governance ". In Debating Dovernance: Authority, Steering and Democracy, Edited by: Pierre, J. 91 - 109. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
46. Susskind, L. 2004. Environmental Diplomacy: Negotiating More Effective Global Agreements, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
47. UN (United Nations) 1993a. Agenda 21: Programme of Action for Sustainable Development, Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, Statement of Forest Principles. New York, NY: United Nations Publications Department of Public Information.
48. UN (United Nations) 1993b. Procedural Arrangements for the Commission on Sustainable Development. Accessed June 4, 2012. http://www.un.org/documents/ecosoc/res/1993/eres1993-215.htm
49. UNFCCC (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change) 2008. Report of the Conference of the Parties on its Thirteenth Session, Held in Bali from 3 to 15 December 2007. Accessed April, 6 2012. http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2007/cop13/eng/06a01.pdf
50. UNFCCC (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change) 2012. Reducing Emissions from Deforestation in Developing Countries. Accessed April 6, 2012. http://unfccc.int/methods_and_science/lulucf/items/4123.php
51. Van Selm, M. and Jankowski, W. 2006. Conducting Online Surveys. Quality & Quantity, 40 (3): 435 - 456. doi: 10.1007/s11135-005-8081-8
52. Warren, M. 2002. What Can Democratic Participation Mean Today?. Political Theory, 30 (5): 677 - 701. doi: 10.1177/0090591702030005003
53. Wettestad, J. 2001. Designing Effective Environmental Regimes: The Conditional Keys. Global Governance, 7 (3): 317 - 341.