On the prospects for democratic deliberation: Values analysis applied to Australian politics

Political Psychology

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 241-266

  Dryzek, John S ^a   Braithwaite, Valerie ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^b AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Australian politics; Democracy; Discourses; Q methodology; Values

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034195008     PISSN: 0162895X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/0162-895x.00186     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Abelson, R. P. (1983). Whatever became of consistency theory? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9, 37-54.
2. Ackerman, B. A. (1990). We the people I: Foundations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3. Benhabib S. (1996a). Introduction: The democratic moment and the problem of difference. In S. Benhabib (Ed.), Democracy and difference: Contesting the boundaries of the political (pp. 3-18). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
4. Benhabib, S. (1996b). Toward a deliberative model of democratic legitimacy. In S. Benhabib (Ed.), Democracy and difference: Contesting the boundaries of the political (pp. 67-94). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
5. Bessette, J. M. (1994). The mild voice of reason: Deliberative democracy and American national government. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6. Blamey, R., & Braithwaite, V. (1997a). The validity of the security-harmony social values model in the general population. Australian Journal of Psychology, 49, 71-77
7. Blamey, R. K., & Braithwaite, V. A. (1997b). A social values segmentation of the potential ecotourism market. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 5, 29-45.
8. Bohman, J., & Rehg, W. (Eds.) (1997). Deliberative democracy: Essays on reason and politics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Braithwaite, V. A. (1979). Exploring value structure: An empirical investigation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Queensland, Brisbane.
10. Braithwaite, V. A. (1982). The structure of social values: Validation of Rokeach's two-value model. British Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 203-211.
11. Braithwaite, V. (1994). Beyond Rokeach's equality-freedom model: Two-dimensional values in a one-dimensional world. Journal of Social Issues, 50, 67-94.
12. Braithwaite, V. (1995). Games of engagement: Postures within the regulatory community. Law & Policy, 17, 225-255.
13. Braithwaite, V. (1997). Harmony and security value orientations in political evaluation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 401-414.
14. Braithwaite, V. (1998a). Designing the process of workplace change through the Affirmative Action Act. In M. Gatens & A. Mackinnon (Eds.), Designing women: Sexuality, work, and policy (pp. 107-128). Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
15. Braithwaite, V. (1998b). The value balance model of political evaluations. British Journal of Psychology, 89, 223-247.
16. Braithwaite, V. (1998c). The value orientations underlying liberalism and conservatism. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 575-589.
17. Braithwaite, V. (1998d). Communal and exchange trust norms: Their value base and relevance to institutional trust. In V. Braithwaite & M. Levi (Eds.), Trust and governance (pp. 46-74). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
18. Braithwaite, V. A., & Blamey, R. (1998). Consensus, stability and meaning in abstract values. Australian Journal of Political Science, 33, 363-380.
19. Braithwaite, V. A., & Law, H. G. (1985). Structure of human values: Testing the adequacy of the Rokeach value survey. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 250-263.
20. Braithwaite, J., & Makkai, T. (1994). Trust and compliance. Policing and Society, 4, 1-12.
21. Braithwaite, V., Makkai, T., & Pittelkow, Y. (1996). Ingelhart's materialism-postmaterialism concept: Clarifying the dimensionality debate through Rokeach's model of social values. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 1536-1555.
22. Brown, S. R. (1980). Political subjectivity: Applications of Q methodology in political science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
23. Brown, S. R. (1986). Q technique and method: Principles and procedures. In W. D. Berry & M. S. Lewis-Beck (Eds.), New tools for social scientists (pp. 57-76). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
24. Cohen, J. (1989). Deliberation and democratic legitimacy. In A. Hamlin & P. Pettit (Eds.), The good polity (pp. 17-34). Oxford: Blackwell.
25. Connolly, W. E. (1991). Identity/difference: Democratic negotiations of political paradox. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
26. Deutsch, M. (1973). The resolution of conflict: Constructive and destructive processes. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
27. Dryzek, J. S. (1990). Discursive democracy: Politics, policy and political science. New York: Cambridge University Press.
28. Dryzek, J. S. (1994). Australian dscourses of democracy. Australian Journal of Political Science, 29, 221-239.
29. Dryzek, J. S. (2000). Deliberative democracy and beyond: Liberals, critics, contestations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30. Dryzek, J. S., & Berejikian, J. (1993). Reconstructive democratic theory. American Political Science Review, 87, 48-60.
31. Eriksen, E. O. (1994). Deliberative democracy and plural society. Paper presented at the Arena Conference on the Europeanisation of Political Theory, Oslo.
32. Estlund, D. (1993). Who's afraid of deliberative democracy? On the strategic/deliberative dichotomy in recent constitutional jurisprudence. Texas Law Review, 71, 1437-1477.
33. Feather, N. T. (1979). Value correlates of conservatism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1617-1630.
34. Feldman, S. (1988). Structure and consistency in public opinion: The role of core beliefs and values. American Journal of Political Science, 32, 416-440.
35. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.
36. Fishkin, J. S. (1997). The voice of the people. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
37. Fraser, N. (1992). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. In C. Calhoun (Ed.), Habermas and the public sphere (pp. 109-142). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
38. Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and ethics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39. Heaven, P. C. L. (1990a). Human values and suggestions for reducing unemployment. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 257-264.
40. Heaven, P. C. L. (1990b). Economic beliefs and human values: Further evidence of the two-value model? Journal of Social Psychology, 130, 583-589.
41. Heaven, P. C. L. (1991). Voting intention and the two-value model: A further investigation. Australian Journal of Psychology, 43, 75-77.
42. Hurwitz, J., & Peffley, M. (1987). How are foreign policy attitudes structured? A hierarchical model. American Political Science Review, 81, 1099-1120.
43. Inglehart, R. (1977). The silent revolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
44. Inglehart, R. (1990). Culture shift in advanced industrial society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
45. Kinder, D. R., & Sears, D. O. (1985). Public opinion and political action. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., vol. 2, pp. 659-741 ). New York: Random House.
46. Kluckhohn, C. K. M. (1951). Values and value orientations in the theory of action. In T. Parsons & E. Shils (Eds.), Toward a general theory of action (pp. 388-433). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
47. Kluckhohn, F. R., & Strodtbeck, F. (1961). Variations in value orientations. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.
48. Knight, J., & Johnson, J. (1994). Aggregation and deliberation: On the possibility of democratic legitimacy. Political Theory, 22, 277-296.
49. Kristiansen, C., & Zanna, M. (1994). The rhetorical use of values to justify social and intergroup attitudes. Journal of Social Issues, 50, 47-65.
50. Lau, R. R., & Sears, D. O. (1986). Political cognition. The 19th annual Carnegie symposium on cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
51. Makkai, T., & Braithwaite, J. (1994). Reintegrative shaming and regulatory compliance. Criminology, 32, 361-383.
52. Manin, B. (1987). On legitimacy and political deliberation. Political Theory, 15, 338-368.
53. McKennell, A. C. (1974). Surveying attitude structures. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
54. Miller, D. (1992). Deliberative democracy and social choice. Political Studies, 40 (special issue), 54-67.
55. Pruitt, D. G., & Carnevale, P. J. (1993). Negotiation in social conflict. Buckingham: Open University Press.
56. Rawls, J. (1993). Political liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
57. Riker, W. H. (1982). Liberalism against populism: A confrontation between the theory of democracy and the theory of social choice. San Francisco: Freeman.
58. Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.
59. Rokeach, M. (1979). Understanding human values: Individual and societal. New York: Free Press.
60. Rose, R., & McAllister, I. (1986). Voters begin to choose. London: Sage.
61. Rosenberg, M. J. (1956). Cognitive structure and attitudinal affect. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 53, 367-372.
62. Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1-65.
63. Schwartz, S. H., & Bilsky, W. (1987). Toward a universal psychological structure of human values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 550-562.
64. Schwartz, S. H., & Bilsky, W. (1990). Toward a theory of the universal content and structure of values: Extensions and cross-cultural replications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 878-891.
65. Scott, W. A. (1960). International ideology and interpersonal ideology. Public Opinion Quarterly, 24, 419-435.
66. Skitka, L., & Tetlock, P. E. (1993). Providing public assistance: Cognitive and motivational processes underlying liberal and conservative policy preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1205-1223.
67. Sniderman, P. M., & Tetlock, P. E. (1986.) Interrelationship of political ideology and public opinion. In M. G. Hermann (Ed.), Political psychology(pp. 62-96). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
68. Stephenson, G. M. (1974). Review of The nature of human values by Milton Rokeach. Sociological Review, 22, 612-614.
69. Thannhauser, D., & Caird, D. (1990). Politics and values in Australia: Testing Rokeach's two-value model of politics - A research note. Australian Journal of Psychology, 42, 57-61.
70. van Mill, D. (1996). The possibility of rational outcomes from democratic discourse and procedure.
71. Williams, R. M. (1968). Values. In E. Sills (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social sciences (pp. 283-287). New York: Macmillan.
72. Young, I. M. (1994). Communication and the other: Beyond deliberative democracy. In S. Benhabib (Ed.), Democracy and difference (pp. 120-135). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
73. Young, I. M. (1997). Difference as a resource for democratic communication. In J. Bohman & W. Rehg (Eds.), Deliberative democracy (pp. 383-406). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.