Optimization of Denser Nonaqueous Phase Liquids-contaminated groundwater remediation based on Kriging surrogate model

Water Practice and Technology

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 304-314

  Lu, Wenxi ^a   Chu, Haibo ^a   Zhao, Ying ^a   Luo, Jiannan ^a  

^a JILIN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

DNAPLs; Groundwater remediation; Kriging; Optimization; Surrogate model

Indexed keywords

DNAPLS; GROUND WATER REMEDIATION; KRIGING; NONLINEAR OPTIMIZATION MODEL; SIMULATED ANNEALING METHOD; SURFACTANT ENHANCED AQUIFER REMEDIATION; SURFACTANT-ENHANCED REMEDIATION; SURROGATE MODEL;

AQUIFERS; IMPURITIES; INTERPOLATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OPTIMIZATION; POLLUTION; REMEDIATION; SIMULATED ANNEALING; SURFACE ACTIVE AGENTS;

COMPUTER SIMULATION;

EID: 84884231993     PISSN: 1751231X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2166/wpt.2013.031     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Atanassov, E. & Dimov, I. T. 2008 What Monte Carlo models can do and cannot do efficiently. Applied Mathematical Modelling 32 (8), 1477-1500.
2. Carrero, E., Queipo, N. V., Pintos, S. & Zerpa, L. E. 2007 Global sensitivity analysis of Alkali- Surfactant-Polymer enhanced oil recovery processes. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 58, 30-42.
3. Dekker, T. J. & Abriola, L. M. 2000 The influence of field-scale heterogeneity on the surfactant-enhanced remediation of entrapped nonaqueous phase liquids. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 42 (2-4), 219-251.
4. Delshad, M., Pope, G. A. & Sepehrnoori, K. 1996 A compositional simulator for modeling surfactant enhanced aquifer remediation, 1. Formulation. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 4 (23), 303-327.
5. Dennis, I., Pretorius, J. & Stey, G. 2010 Effect of fracture zone on DNAPL transport and dispersion: a numerical approach. Environment Earth Sciences (61), 1531-1540.
6. Forrester, A. I. J. & Keane, A. J. 2009 Recent advances in surrogate-based optimization. Progress in Aerospace Sciences 45, 50-79.
7. He, L., Huang, G. H. & Lu, H. W. 2008a A simulation-based fuzzy chance-constrained programming model for optimal groundwater remediation under uncertainty. Advances in Water Resources 31, 1622-1635.
8. He, L., Huang, G. H., Zeng, G. M. & Lu, H. W. 2008b An integrated simulation, inference, and optimization method for identifying groundwater remediation strategies at petroleum-contaminated aquifers in western Canada. Water Research 42 (10-11), 2629-2639.
9. He, L., Huang, G. H. & Lu, H. W. 2009 A coupled simulation-optimization approach for groundwater remediation design under uncertainty: an application to a petroleum-contaminated site. Environmental Pollution 157 (8-9), 2485-2492.
10. Huang, Y. F., Li, J. B., Huang, G. H., Chakma, A. & Qin, X. S. 2003 Integrated simulation- optimization approach for real-time dynamic modeling and process control of surfactant-enhanced remediation at petroleum-contaminated sites. Practice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management 7 (2), 95-105.
11. Huang, Z. J., Wang, C. G., Chen, J. & Tian, H. 2011 Optimal design of aeroengine turbine disc based on Kriging surrogate models. Computers and Structures 89, 27-37.
12. Janusevskis, J. & Le Riche, R. 2013 Simultaneous Kriging-based estimation and optimization of mean response. Journal of Global Optimization 55 (2), 313-336.
13. Jin, Y. 2005 A comprehensive survey of fitness approximation in evolutionary computation. Soft Computing Mathematical Modelling 9, 3-12.
14. Kastner, M. 2010 Monte Carlo methods in statistical physics: Mathematical foundations and strategies. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation 15 (6), 1589-1602.
15. Kleijnen, J. P. C. & van Beers, W. C. M. 2005 Robustness of Kriging when interpolating in random simulation with heterogeneous variances: some experiments. European Journal of Operational Research 165 (3), 826-834.
16. Kleijnen, J. P. C., van Beers, W. V. & Nieuwenhuyse, I. V. 2012 Expected improvement in efficient global optimization through bootstrapped Kriging. Journal of Globoal Optimization 54, 59-73.
17. Krige, D. 1951 A statistical approach to some basic mine valuation problems on the witwatersrand. Journal of the Chemical Metallurgical and Mining Society of South Africa 52 (6), 119-139.
18. Mayer, A. & Endres, K. L. 2007 Simultaneous optimization of dense non-aqueous phase liquid (DNAPL) source and contaminant plume remediation. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 91 (3-4), 288-311.
19. Qin, X. S., Huang, G. H., Chakma, A., Chen, B. & Zeng, G. M. 2007 Simulation-based process optimization for surfactant-enhanced aquifer remediation at heterogeneous DNAPL-contaminated sites. Science of the Total Environment 381 (1-3), 17-37.
20. Qin, X. S., Huang, G. H. & He, L. 2009 Simulation and optimization technologies for petroleum waste management and remediation process control. Journal of Environmental Management 90 (1), 54-76.
21. Schaerlaekens, J., Mertens, J., Van Linden, J., Vermeiren, G., Carmeliet, J. & Feyen, J. 2006 A multi-objective optimization framework for surfactant-enhanced remediation of DNAPL contaminations. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 86, 176-194.
22. Sreekanth, J. & Datta, B. 2010 Multi-objective management of saltwater intrusion in coastal aquifers using genetic programming and modular neural network based surrogate models. Journal of Hydrology 393, 245-256.
23. Wilson, D. J. & Clarke, A. N. 1991 Soil clean up by in-situ surfactant flushing, IV, A two-compnent mathematical mode. Separation Science and Technology 26, 1177-1194.
24. Yang, Z. P., Lu, W. X., Long, Y. Q. & Li, P. 2009 Application and comparison of two prediction models for groundwater levels: A case study in Western Jilin Province, China. Journal of Arid Environments 73, 487-492.
25. Zerpa, L. E., Queipo, N. V., Pintos, S. & Salager, J. L. 2005 An optimization methodology of alkaline-surfactant-polymer flooding processes using field scale numerical simulation and multiple surrogates. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 47, 197-208.