A simulation-based fuzzy chance-constrained programming model for optimal groundwater remediation under uncertainty

Advances in Water Resources

Volumn 31, Issue 12, 2008, Pages 1622-1635

  He, L ^a   Huang, G H ^a,b   Lu, H W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF REGINA   (Canada)

^b NORTH CHINA ELECTRIC POWER UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Fuzzy chance constrained programming; Fuzzy simulation; Groundwater remediation; Petroleum contamination; Possibility

Indexed keywords

ANNEALING; AQUIFERS; CHANNEL CAPACITY; CONSTRAINED OPTIMIZATION; CONTAMINATION; GROUNDWATER; GROUNDWATER RESOURCES; HYDROGEOLOGY; NEURAL NETWORKS; OPTIMIZATION; PETROLEUM REFINERIES; POLLUTION; PROGRAMMING THEORY; SIMULATED ANNEALING; UNDERGROUND RESERVOIRS;

FUZZY CHANCE-CONSTRAINED PROGRAMMING; FUZZY SIMULATION; GROUNDWATER REMEDIATION; PETROLEUM CONTAMINATION; POSSIBILITY;

GROUNDWATER POLLUTION;

AQUIFER POLLUTION; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; CHEMICAL POLLUTANT; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FUZZY MATHEMATICS; GROUNDWATER POLLUTION; NUMERICAL MODEL; OPTIMIZATION; PETROLEUM; REMEDIATION; SIMULATED ANNEALING;

CANADA; NORTH AMERICA;

EID: 55649086394     PISSN: 03091708     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2008.07.009     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Ahfeld D.P., Mulvey J.M., and Pinder G.F. Contaminated groundwater remediation design using simulation, optimization, and sensitivity theory - 1. Model development. Water Resour Res 24 3 (1988) 431-441
2. Ahfeld D.P., Mulvey J.M., Pinder G.F., and Wood E.F. Contaminated groundwater remediation design using simulation, optimization, and sensitivity theory - 2. Analysis of a filed site. Water Resour Res 24 3 (1988) 443-452
3. Aly A.H., and Peralta R.C. Optimal design of aquifer cleanup systems under uncertainty using a neural network and a genetic algorithm. Water Resour Res 35 8 (1999) 2523-2532
4. Andricevic R., and Kitanidis P.K. Optimization of the pumping schedule in aquifer remediation under uncertainty. Water Resour Res 26 5 (1990) 875-885
5. Baú D.A., and Mayer A.S. Data-worth analysis for multiobjective optimal design of pump-and-treat remediation systems. Adv Water Resour 30 8 (2007) 1815-1830
6. Baú D.A., and Mayer A.S. Stochastic management of pump-and-treat strategies using surrogate functions. Adv Water Resour 29 12 (2006) 1901-1917
7. Bear J. Hydraulics of ground water (1979), McGraw-Hill, New York
8. Bounds D.G. New optimization methods from physics and biology. Nature 329 (1987) 215-218
9. Brown CL. Simulation of surfactant enhanced remediation of aquifers contaminated with dense non-aqueous phase liquids. PhD dissertation, University of Texas at Austin, TX; 1993.
10. de Blanc PC. Development and demonstration of a biodegradation model for non-aqueous phase liquids in groundwater. PhD dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin, USA; 1998.
11. de Vicente J., Lanchares J., and Hermida R. Placement by thermodynamic simulated annealing. Phys Lett A 317 (2003) 415-423
12. Delshad M., Pope G.A., and Sepehrnoori K. A compositional simulator for modeling surfactant enhanced aquifer remediation, 1. Formulation. J Contam Hydrol 23 (1996) 303-327
13. Dou C., Woldt W., Bogardi I., and Dahab M. Numerical solute transport simulation using fuzzy sets approach. J Contam Hydrol 27 1-2 (1997) 107-126
14. Dougherty D.E., and Marryott R.A. Optimal groundwater management 1. Simulated annealing. Water Resour Res 27 10 (1991) 2493-2508
15. Dubois D., and Prade H. Fuzzy numbers: an overview. In: Bezdek J.C. (Ed). Analysis of fuzzy information vol. 2 (1988), CRC Press, Boca Raton 3-39
16. Dubois D., and Prade H. Possibility theory, probability theory and multiple-valued logics: a clarification. Ann Math Artif Intel 32 (2001) 35-66
17. Faust C.R., Guswa J.H., and Mercer J.W. Simulation of three-dimensional flow of immiscible fluids within and below the unsaturated zone. Water Resour Res 25 12 (1989) 2449-2464
18. Guan J.B., and Aral M.M. Optimal design of groundwater remediation systems using fuzzy set theory. Water Resour Res 40 1 (2004) 1-20
19. Guan J.B., and Aral M.M. Optimal remediation with well locations and pumping rates selected as continuous decision variables. J Hydrol 221 (1999) 20-42
20. He L., Chan C.W., Huang G.H., and Zeng G.M. A probabilistic reasoning-based decision support system for selecting remediation technologies for petroleum-contaminated sites. Expert Syst Appl 30 4 (2006) 783-795
21. He L., Huang G.H., Zeng G.M., and Lu H.W. Wavelet-based multiresolution analysis technique for data cleaning and its application to water quality management system. Expert Syst Appl (2007) 10.1016/j.eswa.2007.08.009
22. He L., Huang G.H., Lu H.W., and Zeng G.M. Optimization of surfactant-enhanced aquifer remediation for a laboratory BTEX system under parameter uncertainty. Environ Sci Technol 42 6 (2008) 2009-2014
23. He L., Huang G.H., Zeng G.M., and Lu H.W. An integrated simulation, inference, and optimization method for identifying groundwater remediation strategies at petroleum-contaminated aquifers in western Canada. Water Res (2008) 10.1016/j.watres.2008.01.012
24. Hsiao C.T., and Chang L.C. Dynamic groundwater management with inclusion of fixed costs. J Water Resour Plan Manage 128 1 (2002) 57-65
25. Huang G.H., and Chang N.B. The perspectives of environmental informatics and systems analysis. J Environ Inform 1 1 (2003) 1-7
26. Huang GH, Li JB, Maqsood, I. Numerical simulation, risk assessment, site remediation, and monitoring design - a study of soil and groundwater contamination at the Cantuar Field Scrubber Site, Prepared for environmental affairs, TransGas-SaskEnergy; 2003.
27. Huang Y.F., Li J.B., and Huang G.H. Integrated simulation-optimization approach for real-time dynamic modeling and process control of surfactant-enhanced remediation at petroleum-contaminated sites. Pract Periodical Hazard Toxic Radioact Waste Manage 7 2 (2003) 95-105
28. Huang YF. Development of environmental modeling methodologies for supporting system simulation, optimization and process control in petroleum waste management. PhD dissertation, University of Regina, Regina, Saskatchewan; 2004.
29. Huyakorn P.S., Panday S., and Wu Y.S. A three-dimensional multiphase flow model for assessing NAPL contamination in porous and fractured media: 1. Formulation. J Contam Hydrol 16 2 (1994) 109-130
30. Kaluarachchi J.J., and Parker J.C. Multiphase flow with a simplified model for oil entrapment. Transport Porous Med 7 1 (1992) 1-14
31. Kaluarachchi J.J. Effect of subsurface heterogeneity on free-product recovery from unconfined aquifers. J Contam Hydrol 22 3/4 (1996) 19-37
32. Lefkoff L.J., and Gorelick S.M. Design and cost analysis of rapid aquifer restoration systems using flow simulation and quadratic programming. Ground Water 24 6 (1986) 777-790
33. Lenhard R.J., and Parker J.C. Measurement and prediction of saturation-pressure relationships in three-phase porous media systems. J Contam Hydrol 1 (1987) 407-424
34. Lenhard R.J., and Parker J.C. A model for hysteretic constitutive relations governing multiphase flow, 2. Permeability-saturation relations. Water Resour Res 23 12 (1987) 2197-2206
35. Li JB. Development of an inexact environmental modeling system for the management of petroleum-contaminated sites. PhD dissertation, University of Regina, Regina, Saskatchewan; 2003.
36. Li J.B. Stochastic risk assessment of groundwater contamination under uncertainty: a Canadian case study. J Environ Inform 9 2 (2007) 80-86
37. Liu B.D., and Iwamura K. Chance constrained programming with fuzzy parameters. Fuzzy Set Syst 94 (1998) 227-237
38. Liu B.D., and Iwamura K. Fuzzy programming with fuzzy decisions and fuzzy simulation-based genetic algorithm. Fuzzy Set Syst 122 (2001) 253-262
39. Lu H.W., Huang G.H., He L., and Zeng G.M. An inexact dynamic optimization model for municipal solid waste management in association with greenhouse gas emission control. J Environ Manage (2007) 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.10.011
40. Lu H.W., Huang G.H., Zeng G.M., Maqsood I., and He L. An inexact two-stage fuzzy-stochastic programming model for water resources management. Water Resour Manage (2007) 10.1007/s11269-007-9206-8
41. Maqsood I., Li J.B., and Huang G.H. Inexact multiphase modeling system for the management of uncertainty in subsurface contamination. Pract Periodical Hazard Toxic Radioact Waste Manage 7 2 (2003) 86-94
42. Mayer A.S., Kelley C.T., and Miller C.T. Optimal design for problems involving flow and transport phenomena in subsurface systems. Adv Water Resour 25 8-12 (2002) 1233-1256
43. McKinney D.C., and Lin M.D. Approximate mixed-integer nonlinear programming methods for optimal aquifer remediation design. Water Resour Res 31 3 (1995) 731-740
44. McKinney D.C., and Lin M.D. Pump-and-treat groundwater remediation system optimization. J Water Resour Plan Manage 122 2 (1996) 128-136
45. Metropolis N., Rosenbluth A., Rosenbluth M., Teller A.H., and Teller E. Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines. J Chem Phys 21 6 (1958) 1087-1092
46. Minsker B.S., and Shoemaker C.A. Differentiating a finite element biodegradation simulation model for optimal control. Water Resour Res 32 1 (1996) 187-192
47. Minsker B.S., and Shoemaker C.A. Dynamic optimal control of in situ bioremediation of ground water. J Water Resour Plan Manage 124 3 (1998) 149-161
48. Morgan D.R., Eheart J.W., and Valocchi A.J. Aquifer remediation design under uncertainty using a new chance constrained programming technique. Water Resour Res 29 3 (1993) 551-561
49. Mudhoo A., and Mohee R. Sensitivity analysis and parameter optimization of a heat loss model for a composting system. J Environ Inform 8 2 (2006) 100-110
50. Mulligan A.E., and Ahlfeld D.P. A new interior-point boundary projection method for solving nonlinear groundwater pollution control problems. Oper Res 50 4 (2002) 636-644
51. Parks G.T. An intelligent stochastic optimization routine for nuclear fuel cycle design. Nucl Tech 89 (1990) 233-246
52. Rizzo D.M., and Dougherty D.E. Design optimization for multiple management period groundwater remediation. Water Resour Res 32 8 (1996) 2549-2561
53. Rogers L.L., and Dowla F.U. Optimization of groundwater remediation using artificial neural networks with parallel solute transport modeling. Water Resour Res 30 2 (1994) 457-481
54. Rogers L.L., Dowla F.U., and Johnson V.M. Optimal filed-scale groundwater remediation using neural networks and the genetic algorithm. Environ Sci Technol 29 (1995) 1145-1155
55. SERM (Saskatchewan Environment and Resource Management). Risk based corrective actions for petroleum contaminated sites. Province of Saskatchewan, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada; 1999.
56. Suribabu C.R., and Neelakantan T.R. Particle swarm optimization compared to other heuristic search techniques for pipe sizing. J Environ Inform 8 1 (2006) 1-9
57. Tiedeman C., and Goreilick S.M. Analysis of uncertainty in optimal groundwater contaminant capture design. Water Resour Res 29 7 (1993) 2139-2153
58. Wagner B.J., and Goreilick S.M. Optimal groundwater quality management under parameter uncertainty. Water Resour Res 23 7 (1987) 1162-1174
59. Wang W., and Ahlfeld D.P. Optimal groundwater remediation with well location as a decision variable: model development. Water Resour Res 30 5 (1994) 1605-1618
60. Wong H.S., and Yeh W.G. Uncertainty analysis in contaminated aquifer management. J Water Resour Plan Manage 128 1 (2002) 33-45
61. Yan S., and Minsker B. Optimal groundwater remediation design using an adaptive neural network genetic algorithm. Water Resour Res 42 (2006) 10.1029/2005WR004303
62. Zadeh L.A. Fuzzy sets. Inform Control 8 (1965) 338-353
63. Zadeh L.A. Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy Set Syst 1 (1978) 3-28
64. Zheng C., and Wang P.P. A field demonstration of the simulation-optimization approach for remediation system design. Ground water 40 3 (2002) 258-266