The role of task repetition in L2 performance development: What needs to be repeated during task-based interaction?

System

Volumn 41, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 829-840

  Kim, YouJin ^a   Tracy Ventura, Nicole ^b  

^a GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

English as a foreign language; Learner learner interaction; Oral performance; Task repetition; Task based instruction

Indexed keywords

EID: 84884166667     PISSN: 0346251X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2013.08.005     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Adams R. Do second language learners benefit from interacting with each other?. Conversational Interaction in Second Language Acquisition 2007, 29-51. Oxford University Press, Oxford. A. Mackey (Ed.).
2. Ahmadian M.J., Tavakoli M. The effects of simultaneous use of careful online planning and task repetition on accuracy, complexity, and fluency in EFL learners' oral production. Lang. Teach. Res. 2010, 15:35-59.
3. Bygate M. Effects of task repetition: appraising the developing language of learners. Challenge and Change in Language Teaching 1996, 136-146. Heinemann, Oxford. J. Willis, D. Willis (Eds.).
4. Bygate M. Task as the context for the framing, re-framing and unframing of language. System 1999, 27:33-48.
5. Bygate M. Effects of task repetition on the structure and control of language. Task-based Learning: Language Teaching, Learning, and Assessment 2001, 23-48. Longman, London. M. Bygate, P. Skehan, M. Swain (Eds.).
6. DeKeyser R. Beyond focus on form: cognitive perspectives on learning and practicing second language grammar. Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition 1998, 42-63. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. C. Doughty, J. Williams (Eds.).
7. Ellis R. Task-based Language Learning and Teaching 2003, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
8. Ellis R. Language Teaching Research and Language Pedagogy 2012, Wiley- Blackwell, Malden.
9. Foster P., Skehan P. The influence of planning and task type on second language performance. Stud. Second Lang. Acquisition 1996, 18:299-323.
10. Gass S.M. Input, interaction. Handbook of Second Language Acquisition 2003, 224-255. Blackwell Publishers, Oxford. C. Doughty, M. Long (Eds.).
11. Gass S.M., Mackey A. Input, interaction and output in SLA. Theories in Second Language Acquisition 2007, 175-199. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah. J. Williams, B. Van Pattern (Eds.).
12. Gass S.M., Mackey A., Fernandez M., Alvarez-Torres M. The effects of task repetition on linguistic output. Lang. Learn. 1999, 49:549-580.
13. Hawkes M. Using task repetition to direct learner attention and focus on form. ELT J. 2012, 66:327-336.
14. Howell D.C. Statistical Methods for Psychology 2002, Duxberry, Pacific Grove. fifth ed.
15. Johnson K. Language Teaching and Skill Learning 1996, Blackwell, Oxford.
16. Keck C.M., Iberri-Shea G., Tracy-Ventura N., Wa-Mbaleka S. Investigating the empirical link between task-based interaction and acquisition: a meta-analysis. Synthesizing Research on Language Learning and Teaching 2006, 91-131. John Benjamins, Amsterdam. J. Norris, L. Ortega (Eds.).
17. Kim Y. Implementing ability grouping in EFL contexts: perceptions of teachers and students. Lang. Teach. Res. 2012, 16:289-315.
18. Kim Y. Promoting attention to form through task repetition in a Korean EFL context. Second Language Interaction in Diverse Educational Settings 2013, 3-24. John Benjamins, Amsterdam. K. McDonough, A. Mackey (Eds.).
19. Kim Y. Effects of pretask modelling on attention to form and question development. TESOL Q. 2013, 47:8-35.
20. Kim Y., McDonough K. Using pretask modeling to encourage collaborative learning opportunities. Lang. Teach. Res. 2011, 15:1-17.
21. Levelt W. Speaking: from Intention to Articulation 1989, The MIT Press, MA.
22. Long M. The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. Handbook of Research on Language Acquisition 1996, 413-468. Academic Press, New York. W.C. Ritchie, T.K. Bhatia (Eds.).
23. Lynch T., Maclean J. Exploring the benefits of task repetition and recycling for classroom language learning. Lang. Teach. Res. 2000, 4:221-250.
24. Mackey A., Kanganas A.P., Oliver R. Task familiarity and interactional feedback in child ESL classrooms. TESOL Q. 2007, 41:285-312.
25. MacWhinney B. The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk 2000, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah. third ed.
26. Malvern D.D., Richards B.J. Validation of a new measure of lexical diversity. From Sound to Sentence: Studies on First Language Acquisition 2000, 81-96. Benjamins, Amsterdam. M. Beers, B. van den Bogaerde, G. Bol, J. de Jong, C. Rooijmans (Eds.).
27. Norris J., Ortega L. Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: the case of complexity. Appl. Linguistics 2009, 30:555-578.
28. Patanasorn C. Effects of Procedural Content and Task Repetition on Accuracy and Fluency in an EFL Contexts 2010, PhD dissertation, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff.
29. Philp J., Oliver R., Mackey A. The impact of planning time on children's task-based interactions. System 2006, 34:547-565.
30. Robinson P. Task complexity, theory of mind, and intentional reasoning: effects on L2 speech production, interaction, uptake and perceptions of task difficulty. Int. Rev. Appl. Linguistics Lang. Teach. 2007, 45:193-213.
31. Samuda V., Bygate M. Tasks in Second Language Learning 2008, Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
32. Segalowitz N. The Cognitive Bases of Second Language Fluency 2010, Routledge, New York.
33. Swain M. Three functions of output in second language learning. Principle and Practice in Applied Linguistics: Studies in Honor of H.G. Widdowson 1995, 125-144. Oxford University Press, Oxford. G. Cook, B. Seidlhofer (Eds.).
34. Takimoto M. Assessing the effects of identical task repetition and task-type repetition on learners' recognition and production of second language request downgraders. J. Pragmatics 2012, 9:71-96.
35. Yuan F., Ellis R. The effects of pre-task planning and on-line planning on fluency, complexity and accuracy in L2 oral production. Appl. Linguistics 2003, 24:1-27.