Weak courts, strong rights: Judicial review and social welfare rights in comparative constitutional law

Weak Courts, Strong Rights: Judicial Review and Social Welfare Rights in Comparative Constitutional Law

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages

  Tushnet, Mark ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84884063420     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (281)

1. Robert H. Bork, Coercing Virtue: The Worldwide Rule of Judges (2003).
2. Richard A. Posner, "Foreword: A Political Court," 119 Harv. L. Rev. 31, 85-88 (2005).
3. Roger P. Alford, "In Search of a Theory for Constitutional Comparativism," 52 UCLA L. Rev. 639 (2005).
4. Mark Tushnet, "Transnational / Domestic Constitutional Law," 37 Loyola L.A. L. Rev. 239 (2003).
5. Mark Tushnet, "When Is Knowing Less Better than Knowing More? Unpacking the Controversy Over Supreme Court Reference to Non-U.S. Law," 90 Minn. L. Rev. 1275 (2006).
6. Mark Tushnet, "Referring to Foreign Law in Constitutional Interpretation: An Episode in the Culture Wars," 35 Balt. L. Rev. 299 (2006).
7. Steven G. Calabresi & Stephanie Dotson Zimdahl, "The Supreme Court and Foreign Sources of Law: Two Hundred Years of Practice and the Juvenile Death Penalty Decision," 47 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 743 (2005).
8. Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003).
9. Dennis v. United States, 341 U.S. 494 (1951).
10. Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1968).
11. Ceylan v. Turkey, 30 EHRR 73 (2000), ¶ 8.
12. Barbara Singer, "The Right of Publicity: Star Vehicle or Shooting Star?" 10 Cardozo Arts & Ent. L. J. 1, n. 1 (1991).
13. Lange v. Australian Broadcasting Corp., (1997) 189 CLR 520.
14. David A. Anderson, "Is Libel Law Worth Saving?" 140 U. Pa. L. Rev. 497 (1991).
15. James Penzi, "Libel Actions in England, a Game of Truth or Dare? Considering the Recent Upjohn Cases and the Consequences of 'Speaking Out,' " 10 Temp. Imt'l & Comp. L. J. 211 (1996).
16. Regina v. Keegstra, [1990] S.C.R. 697.
17. Mari Matsuda, "Public Response to Racist Speech: Considering the Victim's Story," 87 Mich. L. Rev. 2320, 2341-48 (1989)
18. John R. Penziowell, "As Justice Requires/Permits: The Delimitation of Harmful Speech in a Democratic Society," 16 Law & Inequality 97, 147-50 (1998).
19. A. Alen, B. Tilleman, and F. Meersschaut, "The State and Its Subdivisions," in Treatise on Belgian Constitutional Law 123 (André Alen ed., 1992).
20. Bruce Ackerman, "The New Separation of Powers," 113 Harv. L. Rev. 633 (2000).
21. Steven Calabresi, "Why Professor Ackerman Is Wrong to Prefer the German to the U.S. Constitution," 18 Const. Comm. 51 (2001).
22. William Michael Treanor, "Fame, the Founding, and the Power to Declare War," 82 Corn. L. Rev. 695 (1995).
23. Mark Tushnet, "Interpreting Constitutions Comparatively: Some Cautionary Notes, with Reference to Affirmative Action," 36 Conn. L. Rev. 649 (2004).
24. Vicki C. Jackson, "Narratives of Federalism: Of Continuities and Comparative Constitutional Experience," 51 Duke L. J. 223 (2001).
25. Vicki C. Jackson, "Comparative Constitutional Federalism and Transnational Judicial Discourse," 2 Int. J. Con. L. 91 (2004).
26. United States v. Burns, [2001] 1 S.C.R. 283.
27. Stanford v. Kentucky, 492 U.S. 361 (1989).
28. Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551.
29. Amartya Sen, "Elements of a Theory of Human Rights," 32 Phil. & Pub. Aff. 315, 350 (2004).
30. Mark Tushnet, " 'A Decent Respect to the Opinions of Mankind': Referring to Foreign Law to Express American Nationhood," 69 Alb. L. Rev. 809 (2006).
31. Stanford v. Kentucky, 492 U.S. 361, 369 n. 1 (1989).
32. Anne Gearan, "Foreign Rulings Not Relevant to High Court, Scalia Says," Washington Post, April 3, 2004, p. A-7.
33. Printz, 521 U.S. at 921.
34. Larry D. Kramer, The People Themselves: Popular Constitutionalism and Judicial Review 106-11 (2004).
35. James Bradley Thayer, "The Origin and Scope of the American Doctrine of Constitutional Law," 7 Harv. L. Rev. 129 (1893).
36. Kathleen Sullivan & Gerald Gunther, Constitutional Law 25-26 (14th ed., 2001).
37. New State Ice Co. v. Liebmann, 285 U.S. 262, 311 (1932) (Brandeis, J., dissenting).
38. Claude Lévi-Strauss, Totemism 89 (1963).
39. Konrad Schiemann, "A Response to The Judge as Comparatist," 80 Tulane L. Rev. 281, 283-84 (2005).
40. Lawrence G. Sager, Justice in Plainclothes: A Theory of American Constitutional Practice 3-4 (2004).
41. Robert Dahl, How Democratic Is the Constitution? (2001), ch. 3.
42. Lorraine Eisenstat Weinrib, "The Postwar Paradigm and American Exceptionalism," in The Migration of Constitutional Ideas (Sujit Choudhry ed., 2006).
43. Tony Blackshield & George Williams, Australian Constitutional Law and Theory: Commentary and Materials 1000 (3rd ed., 2002)
44. Sherbert v. Verner, 374 U.S. 398 (1963).
45. Employment Division, Department of Human Resources v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990).
46. Stephen Gardbaum, "The New Commonwealth Model of Constitutionalism," 49 Am. J. Comp. L. 707 (2001).
47. Michael Zander, A Bill of Rights? (4th ed., 1997).
48. John A. G. Griffith, The Politics of the Judiciary (1977).
49. J. Mark Ramseyer, "The Puzzling (In)Dependence of Courts: A Comparative Approach," 23 J. Leg. Stud. 721 (1994).
50. Matthew Stephenson, "Independent Judicial Review," 32 J. Leg. Stud. 781 (2003).
51. Geoffrey Marshall, "The United Kingdom Human Rights Act, 1998," in Defining the Field of Comparative Constitutional Law (Vicki C. Jackson and Mark Tushnet eds., 2002).
52. Kent Roach, The Supreme Court on Trial: Judicial Activism or Democratic Dialogue 8 (2001).
53. Roger A. Shiner, Freedom of Commercial Expression (2003).
54. Robert Dahl, "Decision-Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policy- Maker," 6 J. Pub. L. 279 (1957).
55. Barry Friedman, "Dialogue and Judicial Review," 91 Mich. L. Rev. 577 (1993);
56. Barry Friedman, "The Importance of Being Positive: The Nature and Function of Judicial Review," 72 U. Cin. L. Rev. 1257 (2004).
57. Robert W. Bennett, Talking It Through: Puzzles of American Democracy 101-4 (2003).
58. Robert C. Post, "The Supreme Court, 2002 Term-Foreword: Fashioning the Legal Constitution: Culture, Courts, and Law," 117 Harv. L. Rev. 4 (2003)
59. Robert C. Post & Reva B. Siegel, "Legislative Constitutionalism and Section Five Power: Policentric Interpretation of the Family and Medical Leave Act," 112 Yale L. J. 1943 (2003).
60. Reva B. Siegel, "Equality Talk: Antisubordination and Anticlassification Values in Constitutional Struggles over Brown," 117 Harv. L. Rev. 1470 (2004).
61. Reva B. Siegel, "Text in Context: Gender and the Constitution from a Social Movement Perspective," 150 U. Pa. L. Rev. 297 (2001).
62. Bruce Ackerman, We the People: Foundations 20 (1991).
63. Dan T. Coenen, "The Rehnquist Court, Structural Due Process, and Semisubstantive Constitutional Review," 75 S. Cal. L. Rev. 1281, 1283 (2002).
64. Dandridge v. Williams, 397 U.S. 471, 485 (1970).
65. James Bradley Thayer, "The Origin and Scope of the American Doctrine of Constitutional Law," 7 Harv. L. Rev. 129, 144 (1893).
66. Dandridge, 397 U.S. at 487.
67. San Antonio Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 1, 58 (1973).
68. Mark Tushnet, "Thayer's Target: Judicial Review or Democracy?" 88 Nw. U. L. Rev. 9 (1993).
69. William Van Alstyne, "A Critical Guide to Marbury v. Madison," 1969 Duke L. J. 1, 31-32.
70. William Shakespeare, The First Part of King Henry the Fourth, act III, sc. 1.
71. Ring Lardner, "The Young Immigrunts," in The Ring Lardner Reader 411, 426 (Maxwell Geismar ed., 1963).
72. Kent Roach, The Supreme Court on Trial: Judicial Activism or Democratic Dialogue 176-79 (2001)
73. Roach, supra note 3, at 279-81.
74. Simpson v. Attorney-General [Baigent's Case], (1994) 1 HRNZ 42 (CA).
75. Baigent's Case, (1994) 1 HRNZ 42, 72 (Casey, J.)
76. James Allan & Grant Huscroft, "Constitutional Rights Coming Home to Roost? Rights Internationalism in American Courts," 43 San Diego L. Rev. 1, 25 (2006)
77. Roger Tassé, "Application of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms," in The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms 105 (Gérald A. Beaudoin & Ed Ratushny eds., 2nd ed., 1989).
78. Paul C. Weiler, "Rights and Judges in a Democracy: A New Canadian Version," 18 U. Mich. J. L. Ref. 51, 81-82 (1984).
79. Peter Russell, "Canadian Constraints on Judicialization from Without," 15 Int'l Pol. Sci. Rev. 165, 167 (1994).
80. Christopher P. Manfredi, Judicial Power and the Charter: Canada and the Paradox of Liberal Constitutionalism 202 (1993).
81. Robert S. Goldstein, Saving "Old Glory": The History of the American Flag Desecration Controversy 205 (1995).
82. Daniel LeBlanc, "Martin's Charter Promise Easier Said than Done," Toronto Globe & Mail, Jan. 11, 2006.
83. Manfredi, supra note 34, at 204.
84. Weiler, supra note 27, at 90.
85. Manfredi, supra note 34, at 204.
86. Tsvi Kahana, "The Notwithstanding Mechanism and Public Discussion: Lessons from the Ignored Practice of Section 33 of the Charter," 44 Canad. Pub. Admin. 255 (2001).
87. John Whyte, "On Not Standing for Notwithstanding," 28 Alberta L. Rev. 347, 351 (1990).
88. Gibson, supra note 23, at 125-26.
89. Thomas Reed Powell, "The Still Small Voice of the Commerce Clause," in 3 Selected Essays on Constitutional Law 931, 952
90. Roach, supra note 3, at 175.
91. William N. Eskridge, Jr., & John Ferejohn, "The Article I, Section 7 Game," 80 Geo. L. J. 523 (1992)
92. Lee Epstein, Jack Knight, & Olga Shvetsova, "The Role of Constitutional Courts in the Establishment and Maintenance of Democratic Systems of Government," 35 Law & Soc'y Rev. 117 (2001).
93. Roach, supra note 3, at 194.
94. Michael C. Dorf & Charles F. Sabel, "A Constitution of Democratic Experimentalism," 98 Colum. L. Rev. 267 (1998).
95. Robert H. Bork, "Neutral Principles and Some First Amendment Problems," 47 Ind. L. J. 1 (1971).
96. Geoffrey Stone et al., Constitutional Law 1061 (5th ed., 2005).
97. Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., The Common Law 98 (Mark De Wolfe Howe ed., 1963).
98. R. St. J. Macdonald, "The Margin of Appreciation," excerpted in Louis Henkin et al., Human Rights 564-66 (1999).
99. Sujit Choudhry, "Citizenship and Federations: Some Preliminary Reflections," in The Federal Vision: Legitimacy and Levels of Governance in the United States and the European Union 384-85
100. Habermas, supra note 80, at 500.
101. Frank I. Michelman, "Morality, Identity and 'Constitutional Patriotism,' " 14 Ratio Juris 253, 254-55 (2001)
102. Choudhry, supra note 80, at 394.
103. Choudhry, supra note 80, at 381.
104. Daniel LeBlanc, "Martin's Charter Promise Easier Said than Done," Toronto Globe & Mail, Jan. 11, 2006
105. Michelman, supra note 83, at 269
106. Mark Tushnet, "The Flagburning Episode: An Essay on the Constitution," 61 Colorado L. Rev. 39 (1990).
107. David R. Mayhew, Congress: The Electoral Connection 61-73 (1974).
108. Bamberger, supra note 3.
109. Bruce G. Peabody, "Congressional Constitutional Interpretation and the Courts: A Preliminary Inquiry into Legislative Attitudes, 1959-2001," 29 Law & Soc. Inquiry 127 (2004).
110. Adrian Vermeule, "The Judiciary Is a They, Not an It: Interpretive Theory and the Fallacy of Division," 14 J. Contemp. Leg. Issues 549, 553 (2005)
111. Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137, 179-80 (1803).
112. Peabody, supra note 9, at 146.
113. Ruth Colker & James J. Brudney, "Dissing Congress," 100 Mich. L. Rev. 80, 80 (2001).
114. Mark A. Graber, "The Nonmajoritarian Difficulty: Legislative Deference to the Judiciary," 7 Stud. in Am. Pol. Dev. 35 (1993).
115. Richard H. Fallon, Jr., Implementing the Constitution (2001).
116. John Rawls, A Theory of Justice 30 (1971)
117. David S. Law, "Generic Constitutional Law," 89 Minn. L. Rev. 652 (2005)
118. David M. Beatty, The Ultimate Rule of Law (2004).
119. David Cole, "Enemy Aliens," 54 Stan. L. Rev. 953, 955 (2002)
120. T. Alexander Aleinikoff, "Constitutional Law in the Age of Balancing," 96 Yale L. J. 943 (1987)
121. Gerald Gunther, "In Search of Judicial Quality on a Changing Court: The Case of Justice Powell," 24 Stan. L. Rev. 1001 (1972).
122. Elk Grove Unified Sch. Dist. v. Newdow, 542 U.S. 1 (2004).
123. U.S. Congress, supra note 9.
124. SeeWilliam M. Corrigan, Jr., "The Argument for Lawyers in the Legislature: A Proud History of Service," 59 J. Mo. B. 216 (2003), available at http://www.mobar.org/journal/2003/sepoct/prezpage.htm (visited Jan. 20, 2006).
125. Peabody, supra note 9, at 151-53.
126. Jon Elster, Sour Grapes: Studies in the Subversion of Rationality 43 (1983)
127. Mark Tushnet, "Weak- Form Judicial Review: Its Implications for Legislatures," in Constitutionalism in the Charter Era (Grant Huscroft & Ian Brodie eds., 2005).
128. Elizabeth Garrett & Adrian Vermeule, "Institutional Design of a Thayerian Congress," 50 Duke L. J. 1277 (2001).
129. Daryl Levinson, "Empire-Building Government in Constitutional Law," 118 Harv. L. Rev. 915 (2005).
130. Pickerill, supra note 5, at 27.
131. Buckley, 424 U.S. 1 (1976).
132. McConnell, 540 U.S. 93 (2003).
133. Richard A. Posner, An Affair of State: The Investigation, Impeachment, and Trial of President Clinton 98-99 (1999).
134. Cass R. Sunstein, "Impeachment and Stability," 67 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 699, 709 (1999).
135. Frank O. Bowman III & Stephen L. Sepinuck, "'High Crimes and Misdemeanors': Defining the Constitutional Limits on Presidential Impeachment," 72 S. Cal. L. Rev. 1517, 1545 (1999).
136. Laurence H. Tribe, "Defining "High Crimes and Misdemeanors": Basic Principles," 67 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 712, 721 (1999).
137. Nixon v. United States, 506 U.S. 224, 226-28 (1993).
138. Susan Low Bloch, "A Report Card on the Impeachment: Judging the Institutions that Judged President Clinton," 63 Law & Contemp. Probs. 143, 150 n. 37 (Winter/Spring 2000).
139. E. Enters. v. Apfel, 524 U.S. 498 (1998).
140. Herbert Wechsler, "The Political Safeguards of Federalism: The Role of the States in the Composition and Selection of the National Government," 54 Colum. L. Rev. 543, 546 (1954).
141. United States v. Lopez, 514 U.S. 549, 578 (1995).
142. William P. Marshall, "Federalization: A Critical Overview," 44 DePaul L. Rev. 719, 728-32 (1995).
143. Charles L. Black, Jr., Structure and Relationship in Constitutional Law 90 (1969).
144. Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 507 (2004).
145. Pennsylvania v. Nelson, 350 U.S. 497 (1956).
146. Mark Tushnet, "Evaluating Congressional Constitutional Interpretation: Some Criteria and Two Informal Case Studies," 50 Duke L. J. 1395 (2001),
147. Mark Tushnet, "Non-Judicial Review," 40 Harv. J. on Legis. 453 (2003).
148. Joseph Isenbergh, "Impeachment and Presidential Immunity from Judicial Process," 18 Yale L. & Pol'y Rev. 53 (1999).
149. Lorraine Adams, "A Freshman with an Endgame Idea; As Unassuming Advocate, Collins Hopes 'Findings of Fact' Will Send Message," Wash. Post, Jan. 29, 1999, at A1.
150. Akhil Reed Amar, "On Impeaching Presidents," 28 Hofstra L. Rev. 291, 317-41 (1999).
151. David E. Kendall, "Constitutional Vandalism," 30 N.M. L. Rev. 155, 168 (2000).
152. Kendall, supra note 11, at 155.
153. Northern Sec. Co. v. United States, 193 U.S. 197, 400 (1904).
154. Anthony Clark Arend & Catherine B. Lotrionte, "Congress Goes to Court: The Past, Present, and Future of Legislator Standing," 25 Harv. J. L. & Pub. Pol'y 209 (2001).
155. Campbell v. Clinton, 203 F.3d 19, 23 (D.C. Cir. 2000)
156. John Hart Ely, War and Responsibility: Constitutional Lessons of Vietnam and Its Aftermath 5-10 (1993).
157. Louis Fisher, "Congressional Abdication: War and Spending Powers," 43 St. Louis U. L. J. 931, 1006 (1999).
158. Douglas R. Williams, "Demonstrating and Explaining Congressional Abdication: Why Does Congress Abdicate Power?" 43 St. Louis U. L. J. 1013, 1014 (1999).
159. John C. Yoo, "The Continuation of Politics by Other Means: The Original Understanding of War Powers," 84 Cal. L. Rev. 167, 174 (1996)
160. Peter J. Spiro, "War Powers and the Sirens of Formalism," 68 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1338, 1355-65 (1993).
161. Abraham D. Sofaer, "The Power Over War," 50 U. Miami L. Rev. 33, 55 (1995).
162. Daniel N. Hoffman, "A Republic, If You Can Keep It," 82 Mich. L. Rev. 997, 1001 (1994)
163. Williams, supra note 19, at 1036-37.
164. Fisher, supra note 19, at 100-104 (describing these congressional actions).
165. Kenneth A. Shepsle, "Congress Is a 'They.' Not an 'It': Legislative Intent as Oxymoron," 12 Int'l Rev. L. & Econ. 239 (1992).
166. Williams, supra note 19, at 1030.
167. Louis Fisher, "Constitutional Interpretation by Members of Congress," 63 N.C. L. Rev. 707, 719-20 (1985).
168. Floyd M. Riddick & Alan S. Frumin, Riddick's Senate Procedure 987 (Alan S. Frumin ed., 1992).
169. Charles Tiefer, Congressional Practice and Procedure: A Reference, Research, and Legislative Guide 506 (1989).
170. Riddick & Frumin, supra note 29, at 987.
171. Tiefer, supra note 31, at 507 n. 107.
172. Stephen F. Ross, "Legislative Enforcement of Equal Protection," 72 Minn. L. Rev. 311, 360 n. 195 (1987).
173. M. Bryan Schneider, Note, "The Supreme Court's Reluctance to Enforce Constitutional Prohibitions Against Retroactive Income Tax Statutes," 40 Wayne L. Rev. 1603, 1605 (1994).
174. Charles Tiefer, "The Flag-Burning Controversy of 1989-1990: Congress' Valid Role in Constitutional Dialogue," 29 Harv. J. on Legis. 357, 378-79 (1992).
175. Ross, supra note 37, at 361 n. 198.
176. Fisher, supra note 30, at 719-22.
177. Fisher, supra note 30, at 721.
178. Ross, supra note 37, at 360.
179. Elizabeth Garrett & Adrian Vermeule, "Institutional Design of a Thayerian Congress," 50 Duke L. J. 1277, 1289 (2001).
180. Nelson Lund, "Rational Choice at the Office of Legal Counsel," 15 Cardozo L. Rev. 437, 471-72 (1993).
181. Lund, supra note 58, at 470 n. 75.
182. Robert J. Goldstein, Burning The Flag: The Great 1989-1990 American Flag Desecration Controversy 168-69 (1996) (collecting such statements).
183. Lund, supra note 58, at 472-73 n. 77
184. Mark Tushnet, "The Flagburning Episode: An Essay on the Constitution," 61 U. Colo. L. Rev. 39 (1990).
185. Douglas W. Kmiec, "OLC's Opinion Writing Function: The Legal Adhesive for a Unitary Executive," 15 Cardozo L. Rev. 337, 338-39 (1993).
186. Cornelia T. L. Pillard, "The Unfulfilled Promise of the Constitution in Executive Hands," 103 Mich. L. Rev. 676, 737-38 (2005)
187. Lund, supra note 58, at 466-67.
188. Randolph D. Moss, "Executive Branch Legal Interpretation: A Perspective from the Office of Legal Counsel," 52 Admin. L. Rev. 1303, 1311 (2000).
189. Elizabeth Garrett, "Harnessing Politics: The Dynamics of Offset Requirements in the Tax Legislative Process," 65 U. Chi. L. Rev. 501, 536 n. 134 (1998)
190. Lund, supra note 58, at 470.
191. Pork Barrels and Principles: The Politics of the Presidential Veto (1988).
192. Moss, supra note 82, at 1329.
193. John O. McGinnis, "Models of the Opinion Function of the Attorney General: A Normative, Descriptive, and Historical Prolegomenon," 15 Cardozo L. Rev. 375, 431 (1993).
194. Kmiec, supra note 76, at 340-44.
195. Janet Hiebert, "Rights-Vetting in New Zealand and Canada: Similar Idea, Different Outcomes," 3 N.Z. J. Pub. & Int'l L. 64 (2005).
196. Francesca Klug, Values For a Godless Age: The Story of the UK's New Bill of Rights 166 (2000).
197. Klug, supra note 108, at 170.
198. Geoffrey Marshall, "The United Kingdom Human Rights Act, 1998," in Defining the Field of Comparative Constitutional Law 110 (Vicki C. Jackson & Mark Tushnet eds., 2002).
199. Stephen Grosz et al., Human Rights: The 1998 Act and the European Convention 30 (2000).
200. Marshall, supra note 116, at 110.
201. Handyside v. United Kingdom, 1 Eur. H.R. Rep. 737 (1976)
202. Rabinder Singh, Murray Hunt & Marie Demetriou, "Current Topic: Is There a Role for the 'Margin of Appreciation' in National Law After the Human Rights Act?" 4 Eur. Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 16 (1999)
203. Michael Fordham & Thomas de la Mare, "Identifying the Principles of Proportionality," in Understanding Human Rights Principles 27, 82
204. Keir Starmer, European Human Rights Law: The Human Rights Act 1998 and the European Convention on Human Rights 190-91 (1999).
205. Clive Walker & Russell L. Weaver, "The United Kingdom Bill of Rights 1998: The Modernisation of Rights in the Old World," 33 U. Mich. J. L. Reform 497, 558 (2000)
206. Murray v. United Kingdom, App. No. 18731/91, 22 Eur. H.R. Rep. 29 (1996), at 61.
207. Clive Walker, "The Bombs in Omagh and Their Aftermath: The Criminal Justice (Terrorism and Conspiracy) Act 1998," 62 Mod. L. Rev. 879, 888 (1999).
208. Mountfield, supra note 129, at 23
209. Mountfield, supra note 129, at 23-24
210. Janet L. Hiebert, Charter Conflicts: What Is Parliament's Role? 55 (2002).
211. Hiebert, "Rights-Vetting in New Zealand and Canada," supra note 107.
212. Janet L. Hiebert, "Parliament and the Human Rights Act: Can the JCHR Help Facilitate a Culture of Rights?" 4 Int'l J. Con. L. 1 (2006)
213. Danny Nichol, "The Human Rights Act and the Politicians," 24 Legal Stud. 451, 472 (2004).
214. Hiebert, supra note 145, at 16
215. Hiebert, "Parliament and the Human Rights Act," supra note 150, at 31-35
216. Janet L. Hiebert, "Parliamentary Review of Terrorism Measures," 68 Mod. L. Rev. 676 (2005).
217. Conor Gearty, "11 September 2001, Counter-terrorism, and the Human Rights Act," 32 J. L. & Soc. 18, 27 (2005).
218. Beverley McLachlin, "Charter Myths," 33 U.B.C. L. Rev. 23, 32 (1999)
219. Laurence H. Tribe, Constitutional Choices 255-56 (1985)
220. G. Stone et al., Constitutional Law (5th ed., 2005)
221. Anthony Lewis, "Make No Law": The Sullivan Case and the First Amendment (1991)
222. Mark Tushnet, "Shelley v. Kraemer and Theories of Equality," 33 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 383 (1988)
223. Charles L. Black, Jr., "The Supreme Court 1966 Term-Foreword: 'State Action,' Equal Protection, and California's Proposition 14," 81 Harv. L. Rev. 69, 101 (1967)
224. Robert Hale, "Coercion and Distribution in a Supposedly Non-Coercive State," 38 Pol. Sci. Q. 470 (1923).
225. Frank Goodman, "Professor Brest on State Action and Liberal Theory, and a Postscript to Professor Stone," 130 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1331, 1338 (1982)
226. Greg Taylor, "Why the Common Law Should Be Only Indirectly Affected by Constitutional Guarantees: A Comment on Stone," 26 Melbourne U. L. Rev. 623, 628, 638 (2002).
227. Robert J. Glennon & John Nowak, "A Functional Analysis of the Fourteenth Amendment 'State Action' Requirement," 1976 Sup. Ct. Rev. 221
228. Louis Henkin, "Shelley v. Kraemer: Notes for a Revised Opinion," 110 U. Pa. L. Rev. 473 (1962).
229. Erwin Chemerinsky, "Rethinking State Action," 80 Nw. U. L. Rev. 503, 506 (1985).
230. Gary Peller, "The Metaphysics of American Law," 73 Cal. L. Rev. 1151, 1193-1219 (1985).
231. David E. Bernstein, "Lochner's Legacy's Legacy," 82 Tex. L. Rev. 1 (2003)
232. Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., "Privilege, Malice, and Intent," 8 Harv. L. Rev. 1, 3 (1894)
233. Gary Peller, "Neutral Principles in the 1950's," 21 U. Mich. J. L. Reform 561 (1988)
234. Kent Greenfield, "The Place of Workers in Corporate Law," 39 B.C.L. Rev. 283, 314 (1998)
235. Cass R. Sunstein, The Second Bill of Rights: FDR's Unfinished Revolution and Why We Need It More Than Ever (2004)
236. William J. Novak, The People's Welfare (1996).
237. Morton G. White, Social Thought in America (1976).
238. "Neutrality, Legitimacy, and the Supreme Court: Some Intersections Between Law and Political Science," 20 Stan. L. Rev. 169 (1968).
239. Duncan Kennedy, "Distributive and Paternalistic Motives in Contract and Tort Law, with Special Reference to Compulsory Terms and Unequal Bargaining Power," 41 Md. L. Rev. 563, 580-83 (1982)
240. Larry Alexander, "Trouble on Track Two: Incidental Regulations of Speech and Free Speech Theory," 44 Hastings L. J. 921 (1993)
241. John Fee, "The Formal State Action Doctrine and Free Speech Analysis," 83 N. Car. L. Rev. 569 (2005)
242. Greg Taylor, "Why the Common Law Should Be Only Indirectly Affected by Constitutional Guarantees: A Comment on Stone," 26 Melbourne U. L. Rev. 623, 643 (2002)
243. Charles L. Black, Jr., "Foreword: 'State Action,' Equal Protection, and California's Proposition 14," 81 Harv. L. Rev. 69, 95 (1967)
244. Timothy Macklem, "Vriend v. Alberta: Making the Public Private," 44 McGill L. J. 197, 205-6 (1998-99)
245. Christopher P. Manfredi, "The Life of a Metaphor: Dialogue in the Supreme Court, 1998-2003," (2004) 23 S.C.L.R. (2d) 105, 129.
246. Kenneth Karst, "Equality as a Central Principle in the First Amendment," 43 U. Chi. L. Rev. 20 (1975)
247. Richard Epstein, "Comparative Constitutionalism Meets the New Constitutional Order," 3 U. Chi. J. Int'l L. 455 (2002).
248. Paul Misner, "Christian Democratic Social Policy: Precedents for Third-Way Thinking," in European Christian Democracy: Historical Legacies and Comparative Perspectives 68, 85-88 (2003)
249. Cass R. Sunstein, "Against Positive Rights," in Western Rights? Post-Communist Application (András Sajó ed., 1996)
250. Frank R. Cross, "The Error of Positive Rights," 48 UCLA L. Rev. 857 (2001).
251. Albie Sachs, "The Judicial Enforcement of Socio-Economic Rights:The Grootboom Case"(unpublished manuscript in author's possession).
252. Geoffrey R. Stone et al., Constitutional Law 1108-17 (5th ed. 2005)
253. Thomas I. Emerson, The System of Freedom of Expression 336-42 (1970)
254. Rebecca Tushnet, "Copyright as a Model for Free Speech Law," 42 B.C. L. Rev. 1 (2000)
255. Balakrishnan Rajagopal, "Judicial Governance and the Ideology of Human Rights: Reflections from a Social Movement Perspective," in Human Rights, Criminal Justice, and Constitutional Empowerment: Essays in Honor of Justice V. R. Krishna Iyer (C. Rajkumar & K. Chockalingam eds., 2004).
256. Stephen Holmes & Cass R. Sunstein, The Cost of Rights (1999).
257. Sunstein, supra note 1, at 228, 229.
258. Kim Lane Scheppele, "A Realpolitik Defense of Social Rights," 82 Tex. L. Rev. 1921 (2004)
259. East European Constitutional Rev., vol. 5, no. 1 (Winter 1996), p. 31.
260. Scheppele, supra note 23, at 1947-48
261. Rosalind Dixon, "Creating Dialogue About Socio-Economic Rights: Strong v. Weak-Form Judicial Review Revisited," 5 Int'l J. Con. L. (2007)
262. Gary Jacobsohn, "The Permeability of Constitutional Borders," 82 Tex. L. Rev. 1763, 1770 (2004) (quoting 67 Dail Deb. col. 69 (May 11, 1937), available at http://www.oireachtas-debates. gov.ie/D/0067/D.0067.193705110029.html) (visited Sept. 29, 2006).
263. Richard A. Primus, "Canon, Anti-Canon, and Judicial Dissent," 48 Duke L. J. 243, 244 n. 10 (1998)
264. Frances Fox Piven & Richard A. Cloward, Poor People's Movements: Why They Succeed, How They Fail 264-357 (1977)
265. Bonny Schoonakker, "Treated with Contempt," Sunday Times (S. Afr.), Mar. 21, 2004, available at http://www.suntimes.co.za/2004/03/21/insight/in01.asp (visited Sept. 29, 2006)
266. Lawrence K. Altman, "Infant Drugs for H.I.V. Put Mothers at Risk," New York Times, Feb. 10, 2004, at A22,
267. Michael C. Dorf & Charles F. Sabel, "A Constitution of Democratic Experimentalism," 98 Colum. L. Rev. 267, 452-69
268. Charles F. Sabel & William H. Simon, "Destabilization Rights: How Public Law Litigation Succeeds," 117 Harv. L. Rev. 1015, 1062-73 (2004)
269. Ross Sandler & David Schoenbrod, Democracy by Decree: What Happens When Courts Run Government 139-61 (2003).
270. Peter W. Hogg, 2 Constitutional Law of Canada 37.1(f)-(g) (looseleaf ed., 1997)
271. William Finnegan, "The Economics of Empire-Notes on the Washington Consensus," Harper's, May 2003, at 41-42
272. Ran Hirschl, Toward Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism 46-47 (2004)
273. Charles R. Epp, The Rights Revolution: Lawyers, Activists, and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective (1998).
274. Rita Jalali, "Foreign Aid and Civil Society:How External Aid Is Detrimental to Southern NGOs and Social Movements," Democracy & Society, vol. 2, no. 2, p. 6 (Spring 2005), available at http://www.georgetown.edu/centers/cdats/DemocracyAndSocietyS05.pdf (visited Sept. 29, 2006).
275. Lino A. Graglia, Disaster By Decree: The Supreme Court Decisions on Race and the Schools 38-45 (1976)
276. James S. Liebman & Charles F. Sabel, "The Federal No Child Left Behind Act and the Post- Desegregation Civil Rights Agenda," 81N.C. L. Rev. 1703, 1720 (2003)
277. Pamela S. Karlan, "Exit Strategies in Constitutional Law: Lessons for Getting the Least Dangerous Branch Out of the Political Thicket," 82 B.U. L. Rev. 667, 667 n. 2 (2002).
278. Charles F. Sabel & James S. Liebman, "A Public Laboratory Dewey Barely Imagined: The Emerging Model of School Governance and Legal Reform," 28 N.Y.U. Rev. L. & Soc. Change 183 (2003)
279. Sandra Fredman, "Human Rights Transformed: Positive Duties and Positive Rights," [2006] Pub. L. 498, 514
280. Richard A. Epstein, "Classical Liberalism Meets the New Constitutional Order: A Comment on Mark Tushnet," 3 Chi. J. Int'l L. 445, 464 (2002)
281. Stuart M. Benjamin, "Stepping Into the Same River Twice: Rapidly Changing Facts and the Appellate Process," 78 Tex. L. Rev. 269 (1999).