Searching New Antiparasitics in Virtual Space

Antiparasitic and Antibacterial Drug Discovery: From Molecular Targets to Drug Candidates

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 323-338

  Oellien, Frank ^a   Engels, Kristin ^a   Cramer, Jörg ^a   Marhöfer, Richard J ^a   Kern, Christopher ^a   Selzer, Paul M ^a  

^a Intervet Innovation GmbH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Antiparasitics; Docking; High Throuput Docking; Homology Modelling; Pharmacophor; Scoring Functions; Virtual Screening

Indexed keywords

EID: 84883985150     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9783527626816.ch17     Document Type: Chapter

References (34)

1. Böhm, H.-J., Klebe, G. and Kubinyi, H. (2002) Wirkstoffdesign, Der Weg zum Arzneimittel, Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, Heidelberg.
2. Keil, M., Marhöfer, R.J., Rohwer, A., Selzer, P.M., Brickmann, J., Korb, O. and Exner, T.E. (2009) Molecular Visualization in the Rational Drug Design Process. Frontiers in Bioscience, 14, 2553-2558.
3. Cox, B., Denyer, J.C. and Binnie, A. (2000) Application of High-Throughput Screening Techniques to Drug Discovery. Progress in Medicinal Chemistry, 37, 83-133.
4. Warr, W. (2003) High-Throughput Chemistry, in Handbook of Chemoinformatics: From Data to Knowledge (ed. J. Gasteiger), Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, pp. 1604-1639.
5. Böhm, H.-J. and Schneider, G. (2000) Virtual Screening for Bioactive Molecules, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim.
6. McInnes, C. (2007) Virtual Screening Strategies in Drug Discovery. Current Opinion in Chemical Biology, 11, 494-502.
7. Walters, W.P., Stahl, M.T. and Murcko, M.A. (1998) Virtual Screening-An Overview. Drug Discovery Today, 3, 160-178.
8. Walters, W.P. and Murcko, M.A. (2000) Library Filtering Systems and Prediction of Drug-Like Properties, in Virtual Screeningfor Bioactive Molecules (eds H-.J. Böhm and G. Schneider), Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, pp. 15-31.
9. Lipinski, C.A., Lombardo, F., Dominy, B.W. and Feeney, P.J. (1997) Experimental and Computational Approaches to Estimate Solubility and Permeability in Drug Discovery and Development Settings. Advances in Drug Delivery Research, 23, 3-25.
10. Barnard, J.M., Downs, G.M. and Willet, P. (2000) Descriptor-based Similarity Measures for Screening Chemical Databases, in Virtual Screeningfor Bioactive Molecules (eds H-.J. Bohm and G. Schneider), Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, pp. 59-79.
11. Nicklaus, M.C. (2003) Pharmacophor and Drug Design, in Handbook of Chemoinformatics, From Data to Knowledge (ed. J. Gasteiger), Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, pp. 1687-1711.
12. Stahl, M. (2000) Structure-Based Library Design, in Virtual Screening for Bioactive Molecules (eds H-.J. Bohm and G. Schneider), Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, pp. 229-264.
13. Duca, S.J., Madison, V.S. and Voigt, J.H. (2008) Cross-Docking of Inhibitors into CDK2 Structures 1. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 48, 659-668.
14. Voigt, J.H., Elkin, C., Madison, V.S. and Duca, J.S. (2008) Cross-Docking of Inhibitors into CDK2 Structures 2. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 48, 669-678.
15. McGaughey, G.B., Sheridan, R.P., Bayly, C.I., Culberson, J.C., Kreatsoulas, C., Lindsley, S., Maiorov, V. et al. (2007) Comparison of Topological, Shape, and Docking Methods in Virtual Screening. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 47, 1504-1519.
16. Selzer, P.M., Chen, X., Chan, V.J., Cheng, M., Kenyon, G.L., Kuntz, I.D., Sakanari, J.A. et al. (1997) Leishmania major: Molecular Modeling of Cysteine Proteases and Prediction of New Nonpeptide Inhibitors. Experimental Parasitology, 87, 212-221.
17. Selzer, P.M., Pingel, S., Hsieh, I., Ugele, B., Chan, V.J., Engel, J.C., Bogyo, M. et al. (1999) Cysteine Protease Inhibitors as Chemotherapy: Lessons from a Prasite Target. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 96, 11015-11022.
18. Selzer, P.M. (2005) Structure-Based-Rational-Drug-Design: Neue Wege der modernen Wirkstoffentwicklung, in Allgemeine Parasitologie (eds R. Lucius, T. Hiepe and B. Gottstein), Parey Buchverlag, Berlin.
19. Holtje, H.-D., Sippl, W., Rognan, D. and Folkers, G. (2003) Molecular Modeling, Basic Principles and Applications, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim.
20. Chen, Q., Ma, E., Behar, K.L., Xu, T. and Haddad, G.G. (2002) Role of Trehalose Phosphate Synthase in Anoxia Tolerance and Development in Drosophila melanogaster. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 277, 3274-3279.
21. Kern, C. (2008) Method for the Disruption of Biological Material, EP1595943.
22. Behm, C.A. (1997) The Role of Trehalose in the Physiology of Nematodes. International Journal for Parasitology, 27, 215-229.
23. Engels, K. (2005) Trehalose-6-Phosphatsynthase als Zielprotein zur Entwicklung eines Antiparasitikums, Diplomarbeit im Fachbereich Verfahrenstechnik, Fachhochschule Bingen.
24. Gerber, S., Krasky, A., Rohwer, A., Lindauer, S., Closs, E., Rognan, D. and Gunkel, N. (2006) Identification and Characterisation of the Dopamine Receptor II from the Cat Flea Ctenocephalides felis (CfDopRII). Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 36, 749-758.
25. Rognan, D. (2006) Development and Virtual Screening of Target Libraries. Journal of Physiology, 99, 232-244.
26. Cramer, J., Klinger, A., Gerber, S. and Selzer, P.M. (2006) In silico Screening Towards the Dopaminergic Receptor of the Cat Flea Ctenocephalides felis Abstracts of Papers. 232nd ACS National Meeting, San Francisco, USA.
27. Oellien, F., Cramer, J., Beyer, C., Ihlenfeldt, W.-D. and Selzer, P.M. (2006) The Impact of Tautomer Forms on Pharmacophor-based Virtual Screening. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 46, 2342-2354.
28. Jones, G., Willet, P. and Glen, R.C. (1995) Molecular Recognition of Receptor Sites Using a Genetic Algorithm with a Description of Desolvation. Journal of Molecular Biology, 245, 43-53.
29. Gehlhaar, D.K., Moerder, K.E., Zichi, D., Sherman, C.J., Ogden, R.C. and Freer, S.T. (1995) De novo Design of Enzyme Inhibitors by Monte Carlo Ligand Generation. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 38, 466-472.
30. Krammer, A., Kirchhoff, P.D., Jiang, X., Venkatachalam, C.M. and Waldman, M. (2005) LigScore: A Novel Scoring Function for Predicting Binding Affinities. Journal of Molecular Graphics, 23, 395-407.
31. Bohm, H.J. (1992) LUDI: Rule-based Automatic Design of New Substituents for Enzyme Inhibitor Leads. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 6, 593-606.
32. Eldridge, M.D., Murray, C.W., Auton, T.R., Paolini, G.V. and Mee, R.P. (1997) Empirical Scoring Functions: I. The Development of a Fast Empirical Scoring Function to Estimate the Binding Affinity of Ligands in Receptor Complexes. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 11, 425-445.
33. Jain, A.N. (1996) Scoring Noncovalent Protein-Ligand Interactions: A Continuous Differentiable Function Tuned to Compute Binding Affinities. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 10, 427-440.
34. Muegge, I., Martin, Y.C., Hajduk, P.J. and Fesik, S.W. (1999) Evaluation of PMF Scoring in Docking Weak Ligands to the FK506 Binding Protein. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 42, 2498-2503.