Cross-docking of inhibitors into CDK2 structures. 2

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Volumn 48, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 669-678

  Voigt, Johannes H ^a   Elkin, Carl ^a   Madison, Vincent S ^a   Duca, José S ^a  

^a MERCK RESEARCH LABORATORIES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DOCKING; ENZYME INHIBITION;

CONFORMATIONS SPANNING; SCORING FUNCTION;

PROTEINS;

CDK2 PROTEIN, HUMAN; CYCLIN DEPENDENT KINASE 2; PROTEIN KINASE INHIBITOR;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; DRUG ANTAGONISM; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PROTEIN CONFORMATION;

CYCLIN-DEPENDENT KINASE 2; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN KINASE INHIBITORS;

EID: 42149098914     PISSN: 15499596     EISSN: 1549960X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci700428d     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Leach, A. R.; Shoichet, B. K.; Peishoff, C. E. Prediction of Protein-Ligand Interactions. Docking and Scoring: Successes and Gaps. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 5851-5855, and references therein.
2. Cavasotto, C. N.; Abagyan, R. A. Protein Flexibility in Ligand Docking and Virtual Screening to Protein Kinases. J. Mol. Biol. 2004, 337, 209-225.
3. Duca, J. S.; Elkin, C.; Madison, V. S.; Voigt, J. H. Cross docking of inhibitors into CDK2 structures. 1. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2008, 48, 659-668.
4. Schrödinger, LLC, New York, 2007.
5. Fischmann, T. O.; Hruza, A.; Duca, J. S.; Ramanathan, L.; Mayhood, T. et al. Structure-guided discovery of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors. Biopolymers (Pept. Sci.) 2008, 89, 372-379.
6. Pipeline Pilot v. 6.0.3.0; Accelrys, Inc.: San Diego, CA.
7. Tripos International, 1699 South Hanley Rd., St. Louis, MO 63144, U.S.A.
8. Jones, G.; Willett, P.; Glen, R. Molecular recognition of receptor sites using a genetic algorithm with a description of desolvation. J. Mol. Biol. 1995, 245, 43-53.
9. Jones, G.; Willett, P.; Glen, R. C.; Leach, A. R.; Taylor, R. Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking. J. Mol. Biol. 1997, 267, 727-748.
10. Ihlenfeldt, W. D.; Takahashi, Y.; Abe, H.; Sasaki, S. Computation and management of chemical properties in CACTVS: An extensible networked approach toward modularity and compatibility. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1994, 34, 109-116.
11. Warren, G. L.; Andrews, C. W.; Capelli, A. M.; Clarke, B.; LaLonde, J. et al. A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 5912-5931.
12. (a) Friesner, R. A.; Banks, J. L.; Murphy, R. B.; Halgren, T. A.; Klicic, J. J. et al. Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 1739-1749.
13. (b) Friesner, R. A.; Murphy, R. B.; Repasky, M. P.; Frye, L. L.; Greenwood, J. R. et al. Extra precision glide: docking and scoring incorporating a model of hydrophobic enclosure for protein-ligand complexes. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 6177-6196.
14. Iyer, M.; Zheng, T.; Hopfinger, A. J.; Tseng, Y. J. QSAR Analyses of Skin Penetration Enhancers. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2007, 47, 1130-1149.
15. (a) Matsumoto, M.; Kurita, Y. Twisted GFSR generators. ACM Trans. Model. Comput. Simul. (TOMACS) 1992, 2, 179-194.
16. (b) Matsumoto, M.; Nishimura, T. Mersenne Twister: A 623-Dimensionally Equid-istributed Uniform Pseudo-Random Number Generator. ACM Trans. Model. Comput. Simul. (TOMACS) 1998, 8, 3-30.
17. Spiegel, M. R.; Stephens, L. J. Schaum's Outline of Theory and Problems of Statistics, 2nd ed.; McGraw-Hill: 1999; p 206.
18. All histograms are centered, which means, e.g., a bin labeled with 10% contains items from 5-15%.