Influence of shape and gradient refractive index in the accommodative changes of spherical aberration in nonhuman primate crystalline lenses

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 54, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 6197-6207

  de Castro, Alberto ^a   Birkenfeld, Judith ^a   Maceo, Bianca ^b,c   Manns, Fabrice ^b,c   Arrieta, Esdras ^b   Parel, Jean Marie ^b,c,d   Marcos, Susana ^a  

^a INSTITUTO DE ÓPTICA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI MILLER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c University of Miami College of Engineering   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

Accommodation; Crystalline lens; Gradient refractive index; GRIN; Spherical aberration

Indexed keywords

ACCOMMODATION; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; LENS; LENS DISEASE; LENS GEOMETRY; LENS NUCLEUS; LENS SHAPE; MACACA FASCICULARIS; NONHUMAN; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFRACTION INDEX; SPHERIC ABERRATION; VISUAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS;

ACCOMMODATION; CRYSTALLINE LENS; GRADIENT REFRACTIVE INDEX; GRIN; SPHERICAL ABERRATION;

ACCOMMODATION, OCULAR; ANIMALS; CORNEAL WAVEFRONT ABERRATION; LENS, CRYSTALLINE; MACACA FASCICULARIS; REFRACTION, OCULAR; TOMOGRAPHY, OPTICAL COHERENCE;

EID: 84883887332     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.13-11996     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Lu C, Munger R, Campbell MCW. Monochromatic aberrations in accommodated eyes. In: Ophthalmic and Visual Optics. Noninvasive Assessment of the Visual System. 1993 Technical Digest Series, vol. 3. Washington, DC: Optical Society of America; 1993:160-163.
2. Atchison DA, Collins MJ, Wildsoet CF, Christensen J, Waterworth MD. Measurement of monochromatic ocular aberrations of human eyes as a function of accommodation by the Howland aberroscope technique. Vision Res. 1995;35:313-323.
3. He JC, Burns SA, Marcos S. Monochromatic aberrations in the accommodated human eye. Vision Res. 2000;40:41-48.
4. Cheng H, Barnett JK, Vilupuru AS, et al. A population study on changes in wave aberrations with accommodation. J Vis. 2004; 4:272-280.
5. Gambra E, Sawides L, Dorronsoro C, Marcos S. Accommodative lag and fluctuations when optical aberrations are manipulated. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;9:4.1-4.15.
6. Brown N. The change in shape and internal form of the lens of the eye on accommodation. Exp Eye Res. 1973;15:441-459.
7. Koretz JF, Handelman GH, Brown NP. Analysis of human crystalline lens curvature as a function of accommodative state and age. Vision Res. 1984;24:1141-1151.
8. Dubbelman M, van der Heijde RGL, Weeber HA. Change in shape of the aging human crystalline lens with accommodation. Vision Res. 2005;45:117-132.
9. Garner LF, Smith G. Changes in equivalent and gradient refractive index of the crystalline lens with accommodation. Optom Vis Sci. 1997;74:114-119.
10. Rosales P, Marcos S. Phakometry and lens tilt and decentration using a custom-developed Purkinje imaging apparatus: validation and measurements. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2006;23:509-520.
11. Koretz JF, Bertasso AM, Neider MW, True-Gabelt BA, Kaufman PL. Slit-lamp studies of the rhesus monkey eye: II. Changes in crystalline lens shape, thickness and position during accommodation and aging. Exp Eye Res. 1987;45:317-326.
12. Dubbelman M, van der Heijde RGL. The shape of the aging human lens: curvature, equivalent refractive index and the lens paradox. Vision Res. 2001;41:1867-1877.
13. Strenk SA, Semmlow JL, Strenk LM, Munoz P, Gronlund-Jacob J, DeMarco JK. Age-related changes in human ciliary muscle and lens: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999;40:1162-1169.
14. Moffat BA, Atchison DA, Pope JM. Age-related changes in refractive index distribution and power of the human lens as measured by magnetic resonance micro-imaging in vitro. Vision Res. 2002;42:1683-1693.
15. Borja D, Siedlecki D, de Castro A, et al. Distortions of the posterior surface in optical coherence tomography images of the isolated crystalline lens: effect of the lens index gradient. Biomed Opt Express. 2010;1:1331-1340.
16. Ortiz S, Pérez-Merino P, Gambra E, de Castro A, Marcos S. In vivo human crystalline lens topography. Biomed Opt Express. 2012;3:2471-2488.
17. Campbell MC. Measurement of refractive index in an intact crystalline lens. Vision Res. 1984;24:409-415.
18. Pierscionek BK. Growth and ageing effects on the refractive index in the equatorial plane of the bovine lens. Vision Res. 1989;29:1759-1766.
19. Pierscionek BK, Belaidi A, Bruun HH. Refractive index distribution in the porcine eye lens for 532 nm and 633 nm light. Eye (Lond). 2005;19:375-381.
20. Acosta E, Vazquez D, Garner L, Smith G. Tomographic method for measurement of the gradient refractive index of the crystalline lens. I. The spherical fish lens. J Opt Soc Am A. 2005;22:424-433.
21. Vazquez D, Acosta E, Smith G, Garner L. Tomographic method for measurement of the gradient refractive index of the crystalline lens. II. The rotationally symmetrical lens. J Opt Soc Am A. 2006;23:2551-2565.
22. Axelrod D, Lerner D, Sands PJ. Refractive index within the lens of a goldfish eye determined from the paths of thin laser beams. Vision Res. 1988;28:57-65.
23. Garner LF, Smith G, Yao S, Augusteyn RC. Gradient refractive index of the crystalline lens of the Black Oreo Dory (Allocyttus Niger): comparison of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and laser ray-trace methods. Vision Res. 2001;41:973-979.
24. Pomerantzeff O, Fish H, Govignon J, Schepens CL. Wide-angle optical model of the eye. J Mod Opt. 1972;19:387-388.
25. Hemenger RP, Garner LF, Ooi CS. Change with age of the refractive index gradient of the human ocular lens. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1995;36:703-707.
26. Kasthurirangan S, Markwell EL, Atchison DA, Pope JM. In vivo study of changes in refractive index distribution in the human crystalline lens with age and accommodation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:2531-2540.
27. Hoshino M, Uesugi K, Yagi N, Mohri S, Regini J, Pierscionek B. Optical properties of in situ eye lenses measured with X-ray Talbot interferometry: a novel measure of growth processes. PLoS One. 2011;6:e25140.
28. de Castro A, Ortiz S, Gambra E, Siedlecki D, Marcos S. Threedimensional reconstruction of the crystalline lens gradient index distribution from OCT imaging. Opt Express. 2010;18: 21905-21917.
29. de Castro A, Siedlecki D, Borja D, et al. Age-dependent variation of the gradient index profile in human crystalline lenses. J Mod Opt. 2011;58:1781-1787.
30. de Castro A, Barbero S, Ortiz S, Marcos S. Accuracy of the reconstruction of the crystalline lens gradient index with optimization methods from ray tracing and Optical Coherence Tomography data. Opt Express. 2011;19:19265-19279.
31. Birkenfeld J, de Castro A, Ortiz S, et al. Contribution of the gradient refractive index and shape to the crystalline lens spherical aberration and astigmatism. Vision Res. 2013;86:27-34.
32. Wong K-H, Koopmans SA, Terwee T, Kooijman AC. Changes in spherical aberration after lens refilling with a silicone oil. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:1261-1267.
33. Borja D, Manns F, Ho A, et al. Refractive power and biometric properties of the nonhuman primate isolated crystalline lens. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:2118-2125.
34. Maceo BM, Manns F, Borja D, et al. Contribution of the crystalline lens gradient refractive index to the accommodation amplitude in non-human primates: In vitro studies. J Vis. 2011;11:23.
35. Hermans EA, Dubbelman M, van der Heijde RGL, Heethaar RM. Equivalent refractive index of the human lens upon accommodative response. Optom Vis Sci. 2008;85:1179-1184.
36. Díaz JA, Fernández-Dorado J, Sorroche F. Role of the human lens gradient-index profile in the compensation of third-order ocular aberrations. J Biomed Opt. 2012;17:075003.
37. Bahrami M, Goncharov AV. Geometry-invariant gradient refractive index lens: analytical ray tracing. J Biomed Opt. 2012;17:055001.
38. Smith G, Bedggood P, Ashman R, Daaboul M, Metha A. Exploring ocular aberrations with a schematic human eye model. Opt Vis Sci. 2008;85:330-340.
39. Navarro R, Palos F, González LM. Adaptive model of the gradient index of the human lens. II. Optics of the accommodating aging lens. J Opt Soc Am A. 2007;24:2911-2920.
40. Plainis S, Ginis HS, Pallikaris A. The effect of ocular aberrations on steady-state errors of accommodative response. J Vis. 2005; 5:466-477.
41. Vilupuru AS, Roorda A, Glasser A. Spatially variant changes in lens power during ocular accommodation in a rhesus monkey eye. J Vis. 2004;4:299-309.
42. Vilupuru AS, Kasthurirangan S, Glasser A. Dynamics of accommodative fatigue in rhesus monkeys and humans. Vision Res. 2005;45:181-191.
43. Glasser A, Campbell MC. Presbyopia and the optical changes in the human crystalline lens with age. Vision Res. 1998;38: 209-229.
44. Manns F, Parel JM, Denham D, et al. Optomechanical response of human and monkey lenses in a lens stretcher. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:3260-3268.
45. Augusteyn RC, Mohamed A, Nankivil D, et al. Age-dependence of the optomechanical responses of ex vivo human lenses from India and the USA, and the force required to produce these in a lens stretcher: the similarity to in vivo disaccommodation. Vision Res. 2011;51:1667-1678.
46. Roorda A, Glasser A. Wave aberrations of the isolated crystalline lens. J Vis. 2004;4:250-261.
47. Croft MA, Kaufman PL, Crawford KS, Neider MW, Glasser A, Bito LZ. Accommodation dynamics in aging rhesus monkeys. Am J Physiol. 1998;275:R1885-R1897.
48. Wendt M, Croft MA, McDonald J, Kaufman PL, Glasser A. Lens diameter and thickness as a function of age and pharmacologically stimulated accommodation in rhesus monkeys. Exp Eye Res. 2008;86:746-752.
49. Haefliger E, Parel JM. Accommodation of an endocapsular silicone lens (Phaco-Ersatz) in the aging rhesus monkey. J Refract Corneal Surg. 1994;10:550-555.
50. Nishi O, Nishi K. Accommodation amplitude after lens refilling with injectable silicone by sealing the capsule with a plug in primates. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;116:1358-1361.
51. Koopmans SA, Terwee T, Glasser A, et al. Accommodative lens refilling in rhesus monkeys. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006; 47:2976-2984.
52. Qiao-Grider Y, Hung L-F, Kee C-S, Ramamirtham R, Smith R, Earl L. Normal ocular development in young rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Vision Res. 2007;47:1424-1444.
53. Borja D, Manns F, Ho A, et al. Optical power of the isolated human crystalline lens. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49: 2541-2548.
54. Nankivil D, Manns F, Arrieta-Quintero E, et al. Effect of anterior zonule transection on the change in lens diameter and power in cynomolgus monkeys during simulated accommodation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50:4017-4021.
55. Ehrmann K, Ho A, Parel J-M. Biomechanical analysis of the accommodative apparatus in primates. Clin Exp Optom. 2008; 91:302-312.
56. Augusteyn RC, Rosen AM, Borja D, Ziebarth NM, Parel JM. Biometry of primate lenses during immersion in preservation media. Mol Vis. 2006;12:740-747.
57. Uhlhorn SR, Borja D, Manns F, Parel JM. Refractive index measurement of the isolated crystalline lens using optical coherence tomography. Vision Res. 2008;48:2732-2738.
58. Manns F, Fernandez V, Zipper S, et al. Radius of curvature and asphericity of the anterior and posterior surface of human cadaver crystalline lenses. Exp Eye Res. 2004;78:39-51.
59. Sharma A, Kumar DV, Ghatak AK. Tracing rays through gradedindex media: a new method. Appl Opt. 1982;21:984-987.
60. Atchison DA, Smith G. Chromatic dispersions of the ocular media of human eyes. J Opt Soc Am A. 2005;22:29-37.
61. Rosales P, Wendt M, Marcos S, Glasser A. Changes in crystalline lens radii of curvature and lens tilt and decentration during dynamic accommodation in rhesus monkeys. J Vis. 2008;8: 18.11-1812.
62. Vilupuru AS, Glasser A. The relationship between refractive and biometric changes during Edinger-Westphal stimulated accommodation in rhesus monkeys. Exp Eye Res. 2005;80: 349-360.
63. Richdale K, Sinnott LT, Bullimore MA, et al. Quantification of age-related and per diopter accommodative changes of the lens and ciliary muscle in the emmetropic human eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54:1095-1105.
64. Dubbelman M, van der Heijde RGL, Weeber HA, Vrensen GFJM. Changes in the internal structure of the human crystalline lens with age and accommodation. Vision Res. 2003;43:2363-2375.
65. Hermans EA, Dubbelman M, van der Heijde RGL, Heethaar R. The shape of the human lens nucleus with accommodation. J Vis. 2007;7:16.1-16.10.
66. Koretz JF, Bertasso AM, Neider MW, Kaufman PL. Slit-lamp studies of the rhesus monkey eye: III. The zones of discontinuity. Exp Eye Res. 1988;46:871-880.
67. Barbero S, Marcos S, Merayo-Lloves J. Corneal and total optical aberrations in a unilateral aphakic patient. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28:1594-1600.
68. Jagger WS. The optics of the spherical fish lens. Vision Res. 1992;32:1271-1284.
69. Campbell MC, Hughes A. An analytic, gradient index schematic lens and eye for the rat which predicts aberrations for finite pupils. Vision Res. 1981;21:1129-1148.
70. Vázquez Martínez D. Tomographic Reconstruction of the Gradient Indices with Rotational Symmetry. Application to Crystalline Lenses. Santiago de Compostela: Universidad de Santiago de Compostela; 2007.
71. Jones CE, Atchison DA, Meder R, Pope JM. Refractive index distribution and optical properties of the isolated human lens measured using magnetic resonance imaging. Vision Res. 2005;45:2352-2366.
72. Norrby S. The Dubbelman eye model analysed by ray tracing through aspheric surfaces. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2005;25: 153-161.
73. Lopez-Gil N, Fernandez-Sanchez V. The change of spherical aberration during accommodation and its effect on the accommodation response. J Vis. 2010;10:1-15.