Benefit measures for noise abatement: Calculations for road and rail traffic noise

European Transport Research Review

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 135-148

  Andersson, Henrik ^a   Jonsson, Lina ^b   Ögren, Mikael ^c  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b VTI   (Sweden)

^c SWEDISH NATIONAL ROAD AND TRANSPORT RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Benefits transfer; Hedonic pricing; Railway noise; Road Noise

Indexed keywords

BENEFITS TRANSFER; HEDONIC PRICING; HEDONIC REGRESSION; LITERATURE REVIEWS; MARGINAL VALUES; RAILWAY NOISE; ROAD NOISE; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

ACOUSTIC NOISE; COST ESTIMATING; ECONOMICS; ESTIMATION; NOISE POLLUTION; RAILINGS; RAILROAD TRANSPORTATION; ROADS AND STREETS;

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS;

EID: 84883829046     PISSN: 18670717     EISSN: 18668887     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12544-013-0091-3     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Andersson H, Jonsson L, Ögren M (2010) Property prices and exposure to multiple noise sources: hedonic regression with road and railway noise. Environ Resour Econ 45: 73-89.
2. Andersson H, Ögren M (2007) Noise charges in rail infrastructure: a pricing schedule based on the marginal cost principle. Transp Policy 14(3): 204-213.
3. Andersson H, Ögren M (2011) Noise charges in road infrastructure: a pricing schedule based on the marginal cost principle. J Transp Eng 137(12): 926-933.
4. Angelov EI (2008) Vägtransportsektorns folkhälsokostnader-en första ansats till samlad beräkning. Technical Report 2008: 18, WSP Analys & Strategi, Stockholm.
5. Arsenio E, Bristow AL, Wardman M (2006) Stated choice valuations of traffic related noise. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 11(1): 15-31.
6. Babisch W (2011) Cardiovascular effects of noise. Noise Health 13(52): 201.
7. Babisch W, Bäckman A, Basner M et al (2011) Burden of disease from environmental noise. Bonn: WHO European Centre for Environment and Health.
8. Bateman I, Day B, Lake I, Lovett A (2001) The effects of road traffic on residential property values: a literature review and hedonic pricing study. Technical report, University of East Anglia, Economic & Social Research Council, and University College London.
9. Bateman IJ, Carson RT, Day B, Hanemann M, Hanley N, Hett T, Jones-Lee M, Loomes G, Mourato S, Özdemiroḡlu, Pearce DW, Sugden R, Swanson J (2002) Economic valuation with stated preference techniques: a manual. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.
10. Beelen R, Hoek G, Houthuijs D, van den Brandt P, Goldbohm R, Fischer P, Schouten L, Armstrong B, Brunekreef B (2009) The joint association of air pollution and noise from road traffic with cardiovascular mortality in a cohort study. Occup Environ Med 66(4): 243.
11. Bickel P (2006) Derivation of fall-back values for impacts due to noise. Technical report, HEATCO (Developing Harmonised European Approaches for Transport Costing and Project Assessment).
12. Bickel P, Friedrich R, Burgess A, Fagiani P, Hunt A, Jong GD, Laird J, Lieb C, Lindberg G, Mackie P, Navrud S, Odgaard T, Ricci A, Shires J, Tavasszy L (2006) Proposal for harmonised guidelines. Deliverable 5, HEATCO (Developing Harmonised European Approaches for Transport Costing and Project Assessment).
13. Bjørner TB (2004) Combining socio-acoustic and contingent valuation surveys to value noise reduction. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 9(5): 341-356.
14. Bluhm G, Nordling E (2005) Health effects of noise from railway traffic-the HEAT study. Inter-Noise.
15. Boverket (2003) Buller: Delmål 3-Underlagsrapport till fördjupad utvärdering av miljömålsarbetet'. Boverket, Karlskrona.
16. Brons M, Nijkamp P, Pels E, Rietveld P (2003) Railroad noise: economic valuation and policy. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 8(3): 169-184.
17. Carlsson F, Lampi E, Martinsson P (2004) Measuring marginal values of noise disturbance from air traffic: does the time of day matter? Transp Res Part D 9(5): 373-385.
18. Carson RT, Flores NE, Meade NF (2001) Contingent valuation: controversies and evidence. Environ Resour Econ 19(2): 173-210.
19. Day B, Bateman I, Lake I (2007) Beyond implicit prices: recovering theoretically consistent and transferable values for noise avoidance from a hedonic property price model. Environ Resour Econ 37(1): 211-232.
20. de Vos P (2003) How the money machine may help to reduce railway noise in Europe. J Sound Vib 267(3): 439-445.
21. Dekkers J, van der Straaten JW (2009) Monetary valuation of aircraft noise: a hedonic analysis around Amsterdam airport. Ecol Econ 68(11): 2850-2858.
22. European Commission (1996) Future noise policy-European commission green paper. Report COM(96) 540 final, European Commission, Brussels, Belgium.
23. European Communities (2002) Position paper on dose response relationships between transportation noise and annoyance. Technical report, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg. ISBN 92-894-3894-0.
24. Freeman AM (2003) The measurement of environmental and resource values. Washington, D. C., US: Resources for the Future, 2 edn.
25. Friedrich R, Bickel P (2001) Environmental external costs of transport. Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany.
26. Galilea P, Ortúzar JD (2005) Valuing noise level reductions in a residential location context. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 10(4): 305-322.
27. Garrod GD, Scarpa R, Willis KG (2002) Estimating the benefits of traffic calming on through routes. J Transp Econ Policy 36(2): 211-231.
28. Hammar T (1974) Trafikimmisionens inverkan på villapriser. Statens Vägverk, Vägförvaltningen i Stockholms län, Mimeo.
29. Hansson L (1995) Värdering av Trafikbuller. Bilaga till Samplan, SIKA Rapport 1995 14.
30. ISO (2003) ISO/TS 15666 acoustics-assessment of noise annoyance by means of social and socio-acoustic surveys. Technical report, ISO.
31. DEN. Technical report ETaP404604 ver. 3, SP Akustik.
32. Jonasson H, Nielsen H (1996) Road traffic noise-nordic prediction method. TemaNord 1996: 525, Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen, Denmark. ISBN 92-9120-836-1.
33. Kalivoda M, Danneskiold-Samso U, Krüger F, Bariskow B (2003) EURailNoise: a study of European priorities and strategies for railway noise abatement. J Sound Vib 267: 387-396.
34. Kihlman T (2005) Developments in environmental noise policies. In: Proceedings of forum acusticum. Paper 964-0, Budapest, pp 35-40.
35. Kihlman T, Wibe S, Johansson SM (1993) Priset på tystnad, en enkätstudie om människors värdering av bullerdämpande åtgärder. In: Bilaga 7, SOU 1993: 65, Handlingsplan mot buller: Betänkande av Utredningen för en handlingsplan mot buller. Fritzes, Stockholm, Sweden.
36. Kjellström K, Ferguson R, Taylor A (2008) Den svenska vägtransportsektorns folkhälsoeffekter.
37. Li H, Chau C, Tang S (2009) Valuing road noise for residents in Hong Kong. Transp Res Part D 14: 264-271.
38. Lindberg G (2007) Hälsoeffekter av buller. Appendix in "Värdering av bullerprofiler" 2007: 27, WSP Analys & Strategi, Stockholm, Sweden.
39. Lundström A, Jäckers-Cüppers M, Hübner P (2003) The new policy of the European Comission for the abatement of railway noise. J Sound Vib 267: 397-405.
40. Metroeconomica (2001) Monetary valuation of noise effects: final draft report. Mimeo May, Preparde for The EC UNITE Project.
41. Miedema HME, Oudshoorn CGM (2001) Annoyance from transportation noise: relationships with exposure metrics DNL and DENL and their confidence intervals. Environ Health Perspect 109(4): 409-416.
42. Navrud S (2002) The state-of-the-art on economic valuation of noise: final report to European commission DG environment. Mimeo.
43. Navrud S (2004) The economic value of noise within the European union-a review and analysis of studies. Mimeo.
44. Nellthorp J, Bristow AL, Day B (2007) Introducing willingness-to-pay for noise changes into transport appraisal: an application of benefit transfer. Transp Rev 27(3): 327-353.
45. Nelson JP (1980) Airports and property values. A survey of recent evidence. J Transp Econ Policy 14(1): 37-52.
46. Nelson JP (2004) Meta-analysis of airport noise and hedonic property values. J Transp Econ Policy 38(1): 1-28.
47. Nelson JP (2008) Hedonic property values of studies of transportation noise: aircraft and road traffic. In: Baranzini A, Ramirez J, Schaerer C, Thalmann P (eds) Hedonic methods in housing markets: pricing environmental amenities and segregation. Springer, pp 57-82.
48. Nielsen H (1996) Railway traffic noise-the nordic prediction method. TemaNord 1996: 524, Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen, Denmark. ISBN 92-9120-837-X.
49. Nijland HA, van Kempen EEMM, van Wee GP, Jabben J (2003) Costs and benefits of noise abatement measures. Transp Policy 10(2): 131-140.
50. Nijland HA, van Wee GP (2005) Traffic noise in Europe: a comparison of calculation methods, noise indices and noise standards for road and railroad traffic in Europe. Transp Rev 25(5): 591-612.
51. Niskanen WA, Hanke SH (1977) Land prices substantially underestimate the value of environmental quality. Rev Econ Stat 59(3): 375-377.
52. Nunes PA, Travisi CM (2007) Rail noise-abatement programmes: a stated choice experiment to evaluate the impacts on welfare. Transp Rev 27(5): 589-604.
53. Oertli J (2000) Cost-benefit analysis in railway noise control. J Sound Vib 231(3): 505-509.
54. Ohm A, Jensen MP (2003) Strategi for begræcnsning af vejtrafikstøj-Delrapport 3-Virkemidler og samfundsøkonomiske beregninger. Arbejdsrapport 54, Miljøstyrelsen, København.
55. Ohm A, Lund SP, Poulsen PB, Jakobsen S (2003) Strategi for begrænsning af vejtrafikstøj-Delrapport 2-Støj, gener og sundhed. Arbejdsrapport 53, Miljøstyrelsen, København.
56. Öhrström E, Skånberg A, Barreård L, Svensson H, Ängerheim P (2005) Effects of simultaneous exposure to noise from road and railway traffic. Inter-Noise.
57. Palmquist RB (1992) Valuing localized externalities. J Urban Econ 31: 59-68.
58. Pearce D, Atkinson G, Mourato S (2006) Cost-benefit analysis and the environment: recent developments. OECD, Paris, France.
59. Pindyck RS (2007) Uncertainty in environmental economics. Rev Environ Econ Policy 1(1): 45-65.
60. Prop 2008/09: 35 (2001) Government bill 2008/09: 35: Framtidens resor och transporter-infrastruktur för hållbart tillväxt. Government bill by the Swedish Government.
61. Rosen S (1974) Hedonic prices and implicit markets: product differentiation in pure competition. J Polit Econ 82(1): 34-55.
62. SFS (2001) Fastighetstaxeringslag 1979: 1152. 5 kap. 2 paragrafen, Lag (2001: 1218), Finansdepartementet, Stockholm, Sverige.
63. SIKA (1999) Översyn av samhällsekonomiska kalkylprinciper och kalkylvärden på transportområdet. SIKA Report 1999: 6, SIKA (Swedish Institute for Transport and Communications Analysis), Stockholm, Sweden.
64. SIKA (2005) Kan trafikbullerpolitiken göras mer effektiv?SIKA PM 2005: 11, SIKA (Swedish Institute for Transport and Communications Analysis), Stockholm, Sweden.
65. SIKA (2008) Samhällsekonomiska kalkylprinciper och kalkylvärden för transportsektorn. SIKA PM 2008: 3, SIKA (Swedish Institute for Transport and Communications Analysis).
66. Sørensen M, Hvidberg M, Andersen Z, Nordsborg R, Lillelund K, Jakobsen J, Tjønneland A, Overvad K, Raaschou-Nielsen O (2011) Road traffic noise and stroke: a prospective cohort study. Eur Heart J 32(6): 737-744.
67. SOU (1993) Handlingsplan mot buller: Betänkande av Utredningen för en handlingsplan mot buller. SOU 1993: 65, Statens offentliga utredningar, Miljö- och naturresursdepartementet, Stockholm, Sweden.
68. Sydsæter K, Strøm A, Berck P (2000) Economists' mathematical manual. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany.
69. Wardman M, Bristow AL (2004) Traffic related noise and air quality valuations: Evidence from stated preference residential choice models. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 9(1): 1-27.
70. Wibe S (1997) Efterfrågan på tyst boende. A4 1997, Byggforskningsrådet, Stockholm, Sweden.
71. Wilhelmsson M (1997) Trafikbuller och fastighetsvärden-en hedonisk prisstudie. Meddelande 5: 45, Division of Building and Real Estate Economics, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
72. Wilhelmsson M (2000) The impact of traffic noise on the values of single-family houses. J Environ Plan Manag 43(6): 799-815.